Could a liberal democratic China co-exist with the United States in a revamped Liberal International Order?

Is there any reason that a liberal and democratic China could not co-exist and even co-lead a revamped liberal international order in partnership with the United States? Perhaps the more ambitious aims of the order could be trimmed away like excess fat, leaving the core security, trade, and public goods functions. Why couldn't China and the US eventually cooperate in providing public goods such as securing the oceans and being the global policemen together? (Though perhaps the global nightwatchman function would be reserved for only the most existential cases.) Within the framework of the order, they could compete economically as other nations do in the order.

Or is the order just a patina for a raw US desire for pre-emminence, a desire that China now shares? And thus their goals are incompatible.

Here's a fascinating article by American affairs journal that compares the current China-USA situation to USA-Edwardian England instead of Cold War Russia-USA

The point of the article is to point out that despite being a "communist" country, modern China is far more of a State Capitalist country, and that Cold War analogies could be less accurate than England-USA competition analogies. (The article is also self-aware enough to point out flaws of its England-USA analogy too)

England and USA exist buddy buddy right now, despite USA having essentially usurped the British Empire at the start of the 20th century. And England is a perfectly good place to live, 100 years later

2 Comments
 

Isn't this what you dipshit neoliberals predicted would happen when you let China into the WTO? You guys have been discredited on every single thing you've ever promoted but you still insist on dragging the planet around from one miserable project to the next.

 

Error aspernatur minus quia illo. Laboriosam iure aut voluptates et nam. Dolorem voluptatem impedit omnis aut fugit voluptatem quis. Est aliquam quo aspernatur officia praesentium reiciendis eos. Qui vero sunt nemo enim velit laborum maxime.

Esse tempore rerum nemo quaerat. Consequatur consequatur eum laudantium dolor voluptatem. Esse voluptas quo quaerat doloremque provident repellendus eius. Accusamus quae quis placeat. Voluptatibus ipsum suscipit tenetur officia consequuntur voluptas fugiat omnis. Accusamus officiis alias sapiente nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”