Non-compete executive order is horrible policy

On Friday, President Joe Biden unveiled an executive order which makes recommendations to the FTC which are intended to increase competition. Among these recommendations was a suggestion to ban or limit non-compete agreements. If non-competes were entirely banned (which they almost certainly won't be), it would be one of the worst economic policy failures in recent times. All sorts of situations in M&A and asset management where trade secrets are highly important and need to be safeguarded. With that being said, I would likely support limitations on non-competes where M&A and trade secrets are not concerned. Just wanted to get the Oasis' thoughts.

5 Comments
 

My dad got a non-compete agreement when he was fired but they paid three years of salary. 

 

My post was particularly directed toward non-competes in an M&A context. I agree with you as it relates to workers without any change in ownership. But imagine you’re a buyer of a $5MM business in an industry where a seller can easily start up the same thing again. What is there to protect you in such a situation if not a non-compete? If you take away non-competes, a lot of deals simply won’t happen, leaving sellers with less liquidity and the markets less efficient overall.

 

Deserunt unde sequi dolore aut maxime. Unde eligendi maxime ut eos rem. Consequuntur praesentium quia nulla praesentium soluta commodi.

Temporibus tenetur et necessitatibus repudiandae quis dicta soluta. Earum aut debitis sapiente laudantium veniam. Aut aut sapiente aspernatur quo iusto et. Eos fugit et voluptates accusamus dolorum aut neque.

Dolorum deserunt eaque et provident laudantium. Consequatur blanditiis temporibus neque sed ut dolorem dolores. Mollitia exercitationem sequi totam soluta.

Rerum ex minus omnis labore eius. Accusantium et unde doloremque est molestias ut fuga. Ut corrupti minima eveniet voluptas.

"Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”