Peak Oil? How about Peak… Everything?

I’m sure some of you have already read this but nevertheless, I’m posting it here anyway.

GMO LLC Chairman and strategist extraordinaire Jeremy Grantham released another of his epic letters yesterday, and while bears around the world are trying to call the top of the commodity bubble, he begs to differ.

Grantham alludes that we are now seeing a new normal for commodity prices, a sort of “peak everything” scenario that we all should open our eyes to.

Grantham:
I believe that we are in the midst of one of the giant inflection points in economic history…

...Recognize that we now live in a different, more constrained, world in which prices of raw materials will rise and shortages will be common.

Document after the jump.

JGLetterALL_1Q11

It’s scary how much I agree with him. I won’t comment on gold and the other metals but as far as food is concerned, from a supply and demand standpoint alone you could really see that there’s actual meat behind the price rise – especially with the developed nations raising their import quotas.

How about you monkeys? Do you think we’re in the midst of a new normal for commodities?

Or is it really just another bubble?

I think a correction should be coming soon and then prices will just go from there, but an actual bust down to historical levels? Not sure about that bro.

You?

Have a good one WSO.

 

This is a little scary do to the fact that is nearly impossible to argue against it. The word "forever" though may be a little strong.

The UN did a study and predicted the by the year 2050 the population will taper out around 9.3 billion people. While another study said the population will hit 9 billion by 2070 and then actually begin to decline.

So while I disagree with the forever part I do agree that we will definitely see a steady rise in prices for years to come.

That is of course assuming there is no unfortunate incident that would significantly reduce the population.

 

I think we've already been "policing our own" population with reduced birth rates amongst developed nations. This will curb the perceived shortages that loom in commodities and food.

I think that commodities and food prices will continue to rise to the point that they discover their relevance versus consumption, extracting the maximum possible return from consumers.

My take is that everything will go up, but gradually. The days of cheap stuff are largley over, and now consumers will really have to think about where they spend their money.

 

"...There is little productive new land to bring on and, as people get richer, they eat more grain-intensive meat. Because the population continues to grow at over 1%, there is little safety margin."

I cannot argue with the first point, we have nearly maximized the productivity of land, however Grantham (along with all of the other notorious commodity longs of 2008 and today), continues to ignore human innovation. There are countless projects currently researching food production everywhere from the oceans to enclosures in the cities.

I also cannot argue his second point, but it makes a dangerous assumption. How can we assume people will continue to get richer, particularly if these occasional shortages are expected to slow economic growth? He touches on the subject, with his "...China may stumble" comment, but overall he assumes that the population will grow, and people will get richer. Birth rates have declined substantially in the west as a result of weak economic growth. The emergence of "Emerging Markets," is primarily due to global corporations taking advantage of an aritrage opportunity in labor. As previously imporverished laborers get richer (eating grain intensive meats and living energy intensive lifetyles) shipping costs will rise usurping the labor savings, effectively closing the arbitrage opportunity. It isn't any different than convertible-debt arbitrageurs bidding up the price of the debt, and driving down the price of the equity until the window closes; its just lager and takes longer.

Finally, I have a sneaking suspicion that easy money has a lot to do with the rise in commodity prices. Agricultural commodities had a legitimate reason to rise in price given the confluence of bad weather events this year. The rise in agricultual commodities led to the "Arab Sprng" revolutions, and then Oil prices began to rise, and metlas prices returned from a correction. The first place the Fed's cheap money goes is to guys like Grantham...even mediocre asset managers can get leverage for 25 bps from one broker to use as their collateral on 5:1 levered commodity contract with another broker. The sky is not the limit as resources become stretched people get poorer. When Americans went broke 3 short years ago commodity prices eventually plummeted.

Do you really believe the BRICS et al, with less than 10% the GDP/capita of the West, will take rising prices in stride and continue to consume?

 

A long-term 'long' on food and agricultural prices is a sensible position. However, you are also betting against another Norman Borlaug, or more simply the ability of sub-saharan Africa to be able to make its huge land resources productive.

Interesting discussion though. I tend to find arguments based wholly on demographics often underestimate the ability of the planet and humans to develop and adapt to change.

Jeremy Grantham is a great writer though and alongside Howard Marks is someone I will always read cover-to-cover.

 

Commodities should come down, but even if food prices continue to rise...it's good for us. (Ignoring secondary issues like political stability abroad) We are one of just a few countries with a food surplus.

I can't say I am convinced we will see another green revolution. The anti franken-food crowd in the western world has made it pretty difficult for government to fund that research. And Monsanto et al will not exactly be pushing development of a "cheap food" cure all.

Almost every forecast shows birthrates reaching an equilibrium in the next 100 years. It might mean we will no longer be able to buy dollar burgers, but ~9 billion certainly seems feasible, especially if we start utilizing the ocean for farming / fish farming more efficiently.

 

The commodities run-up is so heavily linked to central bank manipulations that this is hard to take seriously.

Commodities are the next asset bubble.

The developing world might have growing populations but Europe is poised to drop into a demographic winter.

The developing world NEEDS the population surplus because they need cheap labor. You have to sweat your way out of poverty.

********************************* “The American father is never seen in London. He passes his life entirely in Wall Street and communicates with his family once a month by means of a telegram in cipher.” - Oscar Wilde
 
Best Response

My big take-away from it is that the trend in resources has probably changed. Looking at one of the early charts, there's always a possibility that this isn't the case but there are a lot of reasons to be bullish in the next 5-10 years.

I wasn't completely comfortable with some of the points, especially the Malthusian references and the depiction of demographic growth as an impediment to economic growth. Like many have said here, demographic growth is slowing nearly everywhere as economic development spreads and until we can iron out some better solutions as far as taking care of an aging population, we need all the demographic growth we can get. The real paradigm shift, I believe, will be from hydrocarbons to something else. As pressure from prices increases, the search for alternative energy sources, raw materials and food will become more pressing and we'll find solutions without having to subsidize whatever corny "green energy" programs some hippies came up with. There's always a chance that we go a while before finding a suitable replacement to hydrocarbons, but the pace at which technological change has been accelerating, even a couple centuries after the invention of the steam engine, gives room for optimism.

The fact that Grantham includes short-term dangers to his long case makes his report all the more compelling. You can't deny that there are serious distortions in today's commodity prices. Speculative interest in futures contracts is awfully high these days and the end of QE2, coupled with demand destruction, could bring a sharp pull-back. Just because secular shifts support higher commodity prices doesn't mean the basic way markets operate over time flies out the window, silver being a case in point. All in all, great read, but if you're planning on going long and keeping your eyes closed, you are going to be in for one wild ride.

 

Nice read.

Can anyone help me find some more articles on macro topics? Not short enough like news items and not too complex like white papers but something in the middle like this article.

 

Supply & Demand

We won't have shortages. We will have higher prices.

********************************* “The American father is never seen in London. He passes his life entirely in Wall Street and communicates with his family once a month by means of a telegram in cipher.” - Oscar Wilde
 
veritas14:
Supply & Demand

We won't have shortages. We will have higher prices.

Which is basically the same thing, less surplus = higher prices = consumers left out of the market...

Really interesting read.

 
Nicolino:
veritas14:
Supply & Demand

We won't have shortages. We will have higher prices.

Which is basically the same thing, less surplus = higher prices = consumers left out of the market...

Really interesting read.

No, they're not. Not at all.

The higher prices will induce greater supply.

********************************* “The American father is never seen in London. He passes his life entirely in Wall Street and communicates with his family once a month by means of a telegram in cipher.” - Oscar Wilde
 

Temporibus ducimus aspernatur ipsam est delectus voluptatibus. Placeat commodi voluptatem doloremque commodi voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”