199 Comments
 

There might've been a bit of sarcasm implied 

a man with his mouth open standing in front of a crowd and saying, i'm arriving

Edit: me reading through this entire thread after not checking it since last night

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Let's see if Trump keeps his word on those sweeping tariffs and tax breaks.

I have enough liquid assets to live comfortably through a depression, but I'm not entirely sure rural voters are going to sail through it.

Shit, I actually hope that Trump and Musk will just quietly do nothing and take credit for the rising economy they're inheriting, for the sake of your average Joe - but the devil on my shoulder also wants to witness the absolute destruction they'll set in motion.

 

I heard a lot of this nonsense from my urban elite liberal friends.  "We have plenty of money, we're just concerned for those poors".

They're all less rich than they think they are, and I'll bet the same is true for you.  Meanwhile the average Joe is a lot smarter than you think he is.  Which is why he voted for Trump.

 
Most Helpful

Disgraceful in defeat. Insufferable in victory. 
 

You’re pure class all the way. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

CRE

Disgraceful in defeat. Insufferable in victory. 
 

You’re pure class all the way. 

What was pure class was calling half the country garbage. Of course people are being insufferable in victory when the media has been labeling them as garbage racist Nazis for years.

Personally, I don't see this as much a win for Trump as a win for anyone that has been marginalized by the media and the Democrat Party. Guess, what half the country isn't garbage. Black men who voted for Trump are not sexist. Hispanics who voted for Trump are not racist either. Democrat policies suck and they have failed. Americans want something else.

 

Are you guys really this miserable that you can’t even be happy this morning? You literally won the Presidency, Senate, and probably the House and you’re still terminally aggrieved. 
 

Give it a break. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Like Ozy said, I’m a rich white guy. I’m coping fine. 
 

Clearly I’m in the minority this time. America gets what they vote for. That’s how democracy works. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Sure man, enjoy the cope. It’s all you have left, nothing you say matters at this point anyway. Welcome to heaven for America and hell for you in the next 4yrs 

 
thehalifaxgroup

Sure man, enjoy the cope. It’s all you have left, nothing you say matters at this point anyway. Welcome to heaven for America and hell for you in the next 4yrs 

You’re the guy always going on about all of your weird cuckolding fantasies, right? 
 

You should probably sit this one out. Maybe in the chair in the corner of the room. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

billy_boy79

Sure bro, say whatever you want. The results will drive you far more crazy than whatever you say in your attempt to clap back

You don’t know me at all. The results are disappointing, but they are what they are. Pretty undeniable.

It’s pretty weird how obsessed with “liberal meltdowns” some of you guys are. Not everyone has green hair and a septum piercing. Not everyone throws temper tantrums like a 4th grader. 
 

Celebrate your victory like an adult and worry less about “owning the libs.” 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 
CRE

Disgraceful in defeat. Insufferable in victory. 

You’re pure class all the way. 

Your cope is so delicious CRE. I'm gonna savor it. 

image-20241106144401-1

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

"Cope" would be me making excuses for the loss or spinning it in some way. I'm not. It was a emphatic defeat. The American people thoroughly rejected Biden's last four years and what Kamala was offering. Now, as Americans, we move forward with this reality. 

My post had nothing to do with "coping" with the election results. It was directed to you specifically, your 10 year old memes, and your now-edited "Hitler" title. It says a lot that your candidate won and all you care about is "owning the libs." Plenty of us are discussing the election intelligently and you're just being an utter piece of shit as always. 

To reiterate, in defeat you lacked class and now in victory you lack class. If WSO was an office, there would be a large number of people wearing red ties, a few people wearing blue ties, and you in the corner with food dripping down your suit and a stained MAGA hat yelling random words and thinking you're hilarious. 

In two years, or four years, or six years, an election will go my way again. The sun will come up. Life will go on. You will still be a miserable person though. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 
Controversial

You want to know what we won't see?  Joe Biden encourage a bunch of angry traitors to storm the Capitol and threaten lawmakers if they don't overturn the election.

Generally speaking, who cares who wins or loses?  The problem with Trump is and always has been the fact that he's so uninterested in anything but his own self-aggrandizement that he erodes democratic norms.

Whatever.  I'm a rich white guy.  I'll be fine.  His voters are the most likely to suffer, but I'm sure there will be some excuse for it again.

 
Ozymandia

You want to know what we won't see?  Joe Biden encourage a bunch of angry traitors to storm the Capitol and threaten lawmakers if they don't overturn the election.

Generally speaking, who cares who wins or loses?  The problem with Trump is and always has been the fact that he's so uninterested in anything but his own self-aggrandizement that he erodes democratic norms.

Whatever.  I'm a rich white guy.  I'll be fine.  His voters are the most likely to suffer, but I'm sure there will be some excuse for it again.

I agree. The Dems won't encourage their supporters to attack the seat of power in the United States. The Dems' modus operandi is to encourage their supporters to attack innocent people and to destroy businesses in towns and cities far away from power. 

 
GregMadeMeDoIt

I agree. The Dems won't encourage their supporters to attack the seat of power in the United States. The Dems' modus operandi is to encourage their supporters to attack innocent people and to destroy businesses in towns and cities far away from power. 

Ah, you must be referring to the BLM protests that Mr Trump oversaw!

One side respects the will of the voters.  The other claims that any election they don't win is illegitimate.  There is no more debate needed.  You either respect the first principles of democracy, or you don't.  We know what you choose.

 
GregMadeMeDoIt
Ozymandia

You want to know what we won't see?  Joe Biden encourage a bunch of angry traitors to storm the Capitol and threaten lawmakers if they don't overturn the election.

Generally speaking, who cares who wins or loses?  The problem with Trump is and always has been the fact that he's so uninterested in anything but his own self-aggrandizement that he erodes democratic norms.

Whatever.  I'm a rich white guy.  I'll be fine.  His voters are the most likely to suffer, but I'm sure there will be some excuse for it again.

I agree. The Dems won't encourage their supporters to attack the seat of power in the United States. The Dems' modus operandi is to encourage their supporters to attack innocent people and to destroy businesses in towns and cities far away from power. 

You can do better than this non sense.

 

Touch grass.

At the end of his four years, Trump will give up power just like he did last time. No one is taking over the government by force of arms and no one attempted to do so last time either. Trump participated in the democratic process to regain his position and won. Deal with it. This is how democracy works.

 

I know 4 years can feel a long time ago, but have you already forgotten about the fake elector plot? 

Mike Pence not playing ball was literally the only thing that made Trump give up power. And now he has election denier Vance to do the job. 

 

NoEquityResearch

Touch grass.

At the end of his four years, Trump will give up power just like he did last time. No one is taking over the government by force of arms and no one attempted to do so last time either. Trump participated in the democratic process to regain his position and won. Deal with it. This is how democracy works.

Array
 

Just like he did last time. With a violent mob, 36 criminal convictions, in disgrace, having wiped his pale, fat smelly ass with the fabric of the nation and the constitution.

Who am I kidding - you’re just another moron that selectively remembers one of our nation’s darkest days as a “love fest”. Wipe Trump’s venerial jizz off your chin before talking to me you fucking craven degenerate.

Array
 

Kamala hasn't even conceded yet.  Which got me thinking . . has a Dem candidate ever conceded on election night?  Turns out, not in a long ass time.  The last one was Michael Dukakis in 1988.

Dems have their own version of storming the Capitol.  It's whatever you call the first 2 years of Trump's administration when they flooded the national discourse with false claims of Russian election interference.

 
Dr. Rahma Dikhinmahas

Kamala hasn't even conceded yet.  Which got me thinking . . has a Dem candidate ever conceded on election night?  Turns out, not in a long ass time.  The last one was Michael Dukakis in 1988.

Not conceding until the votes have been fully counted is perfectly reasonable.  It's amazing that you are trying to juxtapose this with a man who declared, repeatedly, that any election he lost was automatically fraudulent.

The projection is disgusting, and speaks to a general malaise at the heart of the country - a complete inability to hold oneself responsible.  Sad that this is where the self-proclaimed party of personal responsibility has ended up, with these kinds of feeble attempts at deflection.

When Kamala Harris claims the election was stolen from her, come back and talk to me.

Dems have their own version of storming the Capitol.  It's whatever you call the first 2 years of Trump's administration when they flooded the national discourse with false claims of Russian election interference.

Well, those claims were true.  We know that.  We also know that it was for the benefit of the Trump campaign.  I don't understand how you can just repeat these kinds of demonstrable lies with a straight face and still look in the mirror every morning.  God knows Democrats aren't perfect, either individually or as a group, but at least we hold our own accountable.

Russia did engage in a concerted effort to influence the US election in 2016.  That is an undisputed fact.  They did do so to benefit Mr Trump.  That, also, is an undisputed fact.  The Trump campaign was aware of this, and actively welcomed it (e.g. "collusion).  This, too, is an undisputed fact.

The inability of conservatives to face reality and admit fault is truly astonishing and the most disturbing thing about politics these days.  It's only exacerbated by the need to project those failures and faults onto others.

We can't have a functioning government or democracy when half the country is constitutionally incapable of admitting that their "team" can err or commit a crime.  And that's where we are; Democrats, for all their faults, at least hold their politicians to account when they abuse their position. 

 

Ram a dick in your own ass, doctor. Actually you don’t need to, since Trump’s got that covered already. Guess you couldn’t feel all 1.5 inches of it?

Array
 

I fucking love the Jan 6th chicken littles like yourself who are glued to garbage mainstream media outlets and just parrot their talking points. The democrats are no better, arguably worse, based on how they supported the BLM riots in the summer of 2020 which resulted in:

- more deaths

- more destruction

- more govt buildings taken over and destroyed

- more violence

than Jan 6th could ever approach ALL in the name of political convenience

Do you not recognize the hypocrisy? Can be against both, can be against neither, but to pick or choose one as appalling and one as silence = violence is hypocritical. But then again the lefts entire platform is 'not trump' so they really arent a value based party anymore

 
MonkeyNoise

I fucking love the Jan 6th chicken littles like yourself who are glued to garbage mainstream media outlets and just parrot their talking points. The democrats are no better, arguably worse, based on how they supported the BLM riots in the summer of 2020 which resulted in:

- more deaths

- more destruction

- more govt buildings taken over and destroyed

- more violence

than Jan 6th could ever approach ALL in the name of political convenience

Do you not recognize the hypocrisy? Can be against both, can be against neither, but to pick or choose one as appalling and one as silence = violence is hypocritical. But then again the lefts entire platform is 'not trump' so they really arent a value based party anymore

You can do better, I think.  Normalizing January 6th is Un-American 

 
MonkeyNoise

Do you not recognize the hypocrisy? Can be against both, can be against neither, but to pick or choose one as appalling and one as silence = violence is hypocritical. But then again the lefts entire platform is 'not trump' so they really arent a value based party anymore

No, what I recognize is the fundamental difference between the two actions.

Jan 6th was a bunch of people who were upset they lost an election and decided to overthrow the government by force.  

The BLM protests were made because the policing and judicial infrastructure of this country is demonstrably biased against people of color.

Do YOU seriously not understand the difference?  If the justice system will not treat you fairly, if the police will murder you with impunity, if your vote is suppressed with only the barest fig leaf of shame, then protesting may be your only choice.  By contrast, being allowed to cast your vote and merely having more people vote the other way is not an excuse to bring out the guns and torches.

I guess you think the Founding Fathers were all horrific criminals, right?  After all, they rioted and committed violence because they were upset about having rights.  In fact the American Revolution is a perfect case in point.  No one said "hey, we don't like taxes, lets go tar and feather a bunch of Brits!"  What they said was they wanted the right to vote for what those taxes were and how they were spent.  They wanted a judicial and fiscal system in which they got a fair shake, and when that was denied them by the authorities that were, they revolted.  That's far more the story of BLM than it is the putsch attempt on Jan 6th.

 
Ozymandia

You want to know what we won't see?  Joe Biden encourage a bunch of angry traitors to storm the Capitol and threaten lawmakers if they don't overturn the election.

Generally speaking, who cares who wins or loses?  The problem with Trump is and always has been the fact that he's so uninterested in anything but his own self-aggrandizement that he erodes democratic norms.

Whatever.  I'm a rich white guy.  I'll be fine.  His voters are the most likely to suffer, but I'm sure there will be some excuse for it again.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Just some food for thought on why Trump's policies will be long-lasting (and which upsets you so much):

  • Trump's impact via adding more conservative justices to the courts will be multi-decade. And no matter which dem takes office, their power will be sharply limited by SCOTUS so the magnitude of change liberals can create in the White House for the next 20yrs will come down drastically. Replacing even 1 or even 2 justices would be a massive coup
  • Rationalizing our immigration policy will limit the rate of change on our politics from illegal immigration & the like for 4yrs at least. This further pushes out the liberal agenda
  • Legacy media (outside of NYT, Wash Po, a few others) is dying. Whereas we have X (Twitter) / podcasts / blogs / short form video which are all massively growing. Both of these things will continue to happen in the coming 4yrs and beyond, so the MSM's impact on future elections (already pretty low in 2024) will continue to fall. Which means liberal elitism's ability to carry the day will continue falling, and voters can actually access the truth and make up their own minds 
  • Trump's 2nd term is FAR more well thought out than his first. It includes heavyweights like Vivek, Elon, RFK, and a host of other figures. The strategy is more thought out, the legal briefs for exec orders are structured better, etc. And he'll have 2yrs of a red house, senate, white house, and SCOTUS to effect long-lasting change. Some will be reverse in a future dem admin, but I suspect the majority won't 

So you can be upset, but I don't at all worry about when the Dems next take power since SCOTUs most notably (but other factors above) protect us from the Dems worst tendencies. The work we will do in the next 4yrs will offer a major shield for decades. Let the dems take power if that's the way things go in 2028, I'm fine with that. I'd gladly trade 2028 for Trump to win 2024 as a 2nd term president who has the mandate to make all of the above happen

 
Sequoia

Just some food for thought on why Trump's policies will be long-lasting (and which upsets you so much):

  • Trump's impact via adding more conservative justices to the courts will be multi-decade. And no matter which dem takes office, their power will be sharply limited by SCOTUS so the magnitude of change liberals can create in the White House for the next 20yrs will come down drastically. Replacing even 1 or even 2 justices would be a massive coup

Yes, Court packing is great when you're the one doing the packing, less so when you try to play by the rules.  I have a feeling this will come up again if Trump appoints another justice (which is unlikely; almost all of the justices save Thomas are pretty young) - Democrats will just start playing by the (lack of) rules their Republican colleagues do.  Maybe expand the Court.  Unlikely, but we'll see what happens.  I would have thought the Court packing done by Mr McConnell and Mr Trump was unlikely, too.

  • Rationalizing our immigration policy will limit the rate of change on our politics from illegal immigration & the like for 4yrs at least. This further pushes out the liberal agenda

They most certainly will not.  Republicans made this clear earlier this year - they aren't interested in changing border policy.  It's their main campaign issue.  They cannot "solve" it without losing voters, so they'll continue to propose draconian and ultimately unworkable measures that they know will be voted down or struck down by the Courts so they can continue to campaign on it.  I know there is no way of collecting, but I'd bet good money on this.

  • Legacy media (outside of NYT, Wash Po, a few others) is dying. Whereas we have X (Twitter) / podcasts / blogs / short form video which are all massively growing. Both of these things will continue to happen in the coming 4yrs and beyond, so the MSM's impact on future elections (already pretty low in 2024) will continue to fall. Which means liberal elitism's ability to carry the day will continue falling, and voters can actually access the truth and make up their own minds 

I mean, it's pretty absurd to say that the outlets which have journalistic standards and make a point of reporting facts are the ones not telling the truth, versus the wide variety of media which you named which are all notorious for spreading misinformation.

What you mean to say is there will be fewer and fewer checks that impose a sense of actual reality on the echo chamber someone chooses to live in.

  • Trump's 2nd term is FAR more well thought out than his first. It includes heavyweights like Vivek, Elon, RFK, and a host of other figures. The strategy is more thought out, the legal briefs for exec orders are structured better, etc. And he'll have 2yrs of a red house, senate, white house, and SCOTUS to effect long-lasting change. Some will be reverse in a future dem admin, but I suspect the majority won't 

Elon isn't a heavyweight.  He's an internet troll.

Also, Trump had 2 years of full control in 2016.  He did nothing with it.  What is you expect him to change?  He can't touch entitlements, because those are vote losers.  He won't touch immigration, because that's really the only mainstay of his party's appeal.  He won't touch abortion any further, because his position on it is wildly unpopular. 

He'll try and lower taxes and increase tariffs, both of which will hurt his core constituencies.  So basically his term will be spent in figuring out how to blame liberals for the impacts of his policy decisions

So you can be upset, but I don't at all worry about when the Dems next take power since SCOTUs most notably (but other factors above) protect us from the Dems worst tendencies. The work we will do in the next 4yrs will offer a major shield for decades. Let the dems take power if that's the way things go in 2028, I'm fine with that. I'd gladly trade 2028 for Trump to win 2024 as a 2nd term president who has the mandate to make all of the above happen

Lol.  "Democrats worst tendencies" coming from the guy who likely voted for the man who tried to overthrow an election

 

He was jubilant in his speech after Trump victory.

Everyone is saying he himself voted for Trump and helped with final days shenanigans. His wife was also wearing all-red on election day. Interesting turn of events. 

 

The man wore a MAGA hat and gaffed multiple times to the detriment of Kamala. His wife reportedly got into an altercation with one of Kamala's staffers and just happened to dress in all red when she went out to vote. He doesn't give a flying fuck about Democrats vs Republicans or Trump for that matter, he just wanted power and was forced out of running by a coupe from within the party that installed Kamala so they could keep all the money he raised. I wouldn't be at all shocked if he did some of it on purpose out of spite tbh

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

G   M   E

M    M

E          E

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Kamala lost because she wouldn't denounce the ethnic cleansing of Palestine: Muslims in Wisconsin voted against her.  Maybe now the democrats will support Palestine because it's trump running the killing spree: not from a military perspective, but from a human rights perspective.  15,000 Palestinian children have been killed in the last year and Kamala and her camp don't even see them as human?  I'm an atheist, I don't give a shit what camp wins....razing entire cities to the ground is wrong, it always has been and it always will be.  Dems/liberals will blame third party candidates because they cannot take responsibility for their failings, but the truth is Kamala lost by more votes than were cast for 3rd parties.  Personally, as a leftist, I'm gratified to see the "republican-lite" corporate democrats lose.  Maybe this is the kick in the ass to get more citizens to start running for office or here's a concept....showing up to vote.  Not sure how people think an actual forward thinking movement will get started in USA, the republicans exist to serve the rich and the democrats exist to get the average dope to think they're some kind of alternative.  Apparently people can't just make positive changes, they have to push the existing failed system to collapse and build a new one.

For now, Americans have chosen money and ego over independence and freedom and you know what...I'm fine with it.  While I'd prefer to live in a more forward thinking society, hey, if the average shithead wants to hand me more money it just speeds up my plans for early retirement.

Oh, and if you're a trumper....you can go fuck yourself as well.

Get busy living
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Yeah seriously....I mean people like UFOinsider can keep thinking that Democrats need to go more woke and we'll win 2028 as well.

Just a really good example of how bad the echo chamber is on the Left. For their own sake, they should try to learn from this. I mean I'm fine if they don't because it means a lot more W's for the Republicans in the future but just trying to give some friendly advice.

 
UFOinsider

Kamala lost because she wouldn't denounce the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

Personally, as a leftist, I'm gratified to see the "republican-lite" corporate democrats lose. 

Two things: 

  1. Kamala lost because of inflation, immigration, and incumbency. Full stop. 
  2. Moving further left isn't going to win the party anything at a national scale. 
Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

This will sound too simple but I think we’re overlooking the part that a lot of people in this country don’t want to have a woman commander in chief and will veil that thin belief behind the political shortcomings of Clinton / Harris.

Latino voters showed out for Trump, both men and women, and that is a deeply catholic and traditional gender norms voting group - many other minorities that didn’t show up for the democrats have the same social norms. White women vote alongside their white men counterparts so that’s to be expected as well. Harris lost badly in rural areas which also tend to be more traditional. There’s the conservative gender norms but also an argument to be made: will our adversaries abroad respect and or test the military resolve of a woman commander in chief? This is not the time in international relations to test that out to be honest.

I have no strong opinion on the matter truly but I think that’s one of the “too simplistic” quiet parts nobody wants to say out loud.

 

Not close and no cigar, latinos have been voting for decades so this excuse fails.  The deciding votes were cast in Wisconsin, where the swing voters were Muslims outraged by Biden funneling $24B of weapons to Israel's extermination of Gaza....and if you doubt that, you can literally see them celebrating this on TikTok.

The left has abandoned the democrats.  Let them burn.

Get busy living
 

I get that this issue is really important to you - and it’s not lost on me that the far left has been upset with democrats ever since Bernie lost the primary, but respectfully no, Muslims in Wisconsin were not the reason Harris lost both the electoral college and the popular vote - that demographic that is a single issue voter on Palestine is not big enough to fill the gap of loss here.

Harris lost PA because of its large bastion of Latino voters overwhelmingly supported Trump in 2024 vs. Biden in 2020. NV is a similar story. There were 36.2 million Latino votes to win this year vs. 2.5 - 3.5 million Muslim voters. Now it IS true these Muslim voters are majority spread across key swing states so if the election was much closer I would accept the argument that they swung the election but that’s not clear to me today

Respectfully, if Biden didn’t need the left in 2020 to win why did Harris? Because Harris, despite all her efforts, couldn’t capture those “in the middle” republicans who could swing back and forth depending on policy or those voters, spread across all parties, that just don’t believe the president should be a woman, let’s get real here.

 
UFOinsider

Not close and no cigar, latinos have been voting for decades so this excuse fails.  The deciding votes were cast in Wisconsin, where the swing voters were Muslims outraged by Biden funneling $24B of weapons to Israel's extermination of Gaza....and if you doubt that, you can literally see them celebrating this on TikTok.

And someone who makes that their single issue deserves the rude awakening they're about to get with Mr Trump in power again.

The left has abandoned the democrats.  Let them burn.

I mean, this goes for the right too.  Not that I expect the average voter to be intelligent about their self-interest, and certainly not the kind of identity-politics and grievance voting that has come to define American conservatism, but they're the ones who are going to suffer from Mr Trump's "conceptions of a plan".

It'll just be interesting to see how they blame liberals for it, as they inevitably will.  If some of WSO's leading "lights" of conservatism are any indication, your average rural voter who is about to see skyrocketing prices and an increasing inability to access health care will simply say "liberals would be worse" with no justification.  Or choose to believe that Kamala Harris was actually a pedophile, or a lizard person, or whatever conservatives are saying these days

 
liquidiot

This will sound too simple but I think we’re overlooking the part that a lot of people in this country don’t want to have a woman commander in chief and will veil that thin belief behind the political shortcomings of Clinton / Harris.

Latino voters showed out for Trump, both men and women, and that is a deeply catholic and traditional gender norms voting group - many other minorities that didn’t show up for the democrats have the same social norms. White women vote alongside their white men counterparts so that’s to be expected as well. Harris lost badly in rural areas which also tend to be more traditional. There’s the conservative gender norms but also an argument to be made: will our adversaries abroad respect and or test the military resolve of a woman commander in chief? This is not the time in international relations to test that out to be honest.

I have no strong opinion on the matter truly but I think that’s one of the “too simplistic” quiet parts nobody wants to say out loud.

This deeply underestimates how bad the two women candidates (Harris and Clinton) were. Clinton was a deeply unpopular figure going into the 2016 election and so was Harris in 2024. For what it's worth, Clinton won the popular vote and Harris performed about as well as Joe Biden was expected to perform in 2024, which is why he was replaced in the first place. 

 

I think you're deeply underestimating why these two candidates were so "unpopular" in the first place. Clinton had a perfectly qualified public service / administration leadership profile but the email scandal led to her demise. Whether or not the reaction to that was overblown (to cover up the preference of not having a woman president) is not worth debating at this point, so let's just say her disdain from the public is valid.

Harris is only deeply disliked because she's attached to the Biden administration - so if you think Biden was a failure, you think Harris would be more of the same. She also had an extremely qualified track record, Attorney General > Vice President is more experience than Trump had in public service when he won the first time around, and she did make an honest effort to release new economic policy plans to differentiate herself from the Biden administration that made sense. People don't want to hear this, but if Harris was a white American man at the same age, with the same energy as Harris - this election outcome would be very different! Hell, I even think if she picked a less goofy VP such as Tim Walz, she could have faired better - he really messed up that VP debate against Vance and people do think about succession when picking their President. Honestly, I think that was her carrot half-thrown to the left given the policies he passed in Minnesota.   

 

Don't think it has much to do with being a woman. She was less popular than Biden before the media tried to gaslight the country with the politics of joy BS. She was the least impressive Democrat running in 2020 other than maybe Beto.

Nikki Haley ran second in the primaries. If the Democrats ran Whitmer instead of Harris, they probably would've won. When given the chance, she stuck with Biden who was very unpopular. She should've done something to distance herself from him economically at a minimum.

 
liquidiot

This will sound too simple but I think we’re overlooking the part that a lot of people in this country don’t want to have a woman commander in chief and will veil that thin belief behind the political shortcomings of Clinton / Harris.

Latino voters showed out for Trump, both men and women, and that is a deeply catholic and traditional gender norms voting group - many other minorities that didn’t show up for the democrats have the same social norms. White women vote alongside their white men counterparts so that’s to be expected as well. Harris lost badly in rural areas which also tend to be more traditional. There’s the conservative gender norms but also an argument to be made: will our adversaries abroad respect and or test the military resolve of a woman commander in chief? This is not the time in international relations to test that out to be honest.

I have no strong opinion on the matter truly but I think that’s one of the “too simplistic” quiet parts nobody wants to say out loud.

I think you're vastly underestimating the political shortcomings of both of those candidates and oversimplifying it to the same misogyny argument they make any time a woman runs and loses. But in the end, even if it were true that a plurality of people simply vote through the lens of "I don't want a woman to run the country or our military"... Why is that bad? Is the thought of there being a single job in Western society that a woman isn't able to get popular support for that intolerable?

The world's filled with bad guys (Putin, Xi, KJU, etc.) and maybe, just maybe, both men and women want to feel assured that their own strongman is a bulwark against those forces. Any woman who gets on stage to drone on about race/misogyny/LGBTQIA2S%&@, how unfair things are, and constantly denigrates the single largest demographic of their own military doesn't come across as "strong", especially if they've never served themselves and have been nothing but white collar political climbers their entire career. There aren't many women girlbossing their way through old legends and myths on the hero's journey from any part of the world and popular culture certainly hasn't rewarded modern storytellers who try to incorporate that messaging into film.

Also, you're dropping some key stats here. Single white women vote >70% Democrat. Married white women will vote more in-line with white men.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

God bless 🙏

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

I am surprised that I am allowed to post here.  You are not going to want to hear this but Kamala lost badly mostly because she is black and female. We have never had a female president even though half of the population is female and there are very few black people in the senate.  In fact, until this election, we have never had more than 1 black female senator.  Harris got 15 million less votes than Biden. A difference of 15 million votes is probably not based entirely on policy. Their policies probably do not differ all that much.  It should not have been all that difficult to be competitive against a candidate who supported an insurrection against the US, questioned the legitimacy of entire voting system, allegedly sexually assaulted lots of women, etc.    

I was never in favor of her being the nominee because I did not think the US would vote for a black female to become the POTUS.  I understand why she was the nominee but my pick would have been Shapiro because he is a very popular governor and Jewish males frequently rise to high levels of political power in the US.  At the very least, the dems should have done with Shapiro as the veep.

 

I think you overestimate the number of misogynists and racists. Trump did very well with minorities. Kamala had all kinds of issues that were unique to her (VP and never distancing herself from any Biden policies despite his unpopularity; her lack of substance; her involvement, perceived or real, with the border situation early in Biden's presidency). If they ran Whitmer or Cory Booker, it wouldn't have been a bloodbath last night. Obama circa 2008 or 2012 would've crushed Trump. A left-of-center version of Nikki Haley would've won comfortably. All last night tells you is that Kamala = Biden in voter's minds (and she actively chose not to change this perception) and the economic vibes were better in 2016-2020 than 2020-2024. Looking at CNN's data, it looks like white men and women's voting for Trump narrowed vs 2020. The story is the Latinos and Latinas (and black men at the margin) moving towards Trump.

But plenty of people will default to America is irredeemably racist and sexist and do little to no soul searching. I do agree with you though that if the Democrats were going to force Biden to step aside, they might as well have run something resembling a mini primary, because Kamala was basically the worst option at that point. Newsome, Whitmer, Shapiro probably win a tight one last night.

 

Porro facilis mollitia maiores voluptatem. Temporibus ullam tempora sequi perspiciatis rerum. Magnam fugit qui placeat et maiores. Autem deserunt placeat fugit soluta eum quidem. Error voluptas et praesentium accusantium.

 

Autem perspiciatis aut ut corporis est quis nihil. Quod harum ipsum rem molestiae provident. Qui labore ipsa commodi nesciunt et veniam omnis qui. At illo dolores hic repellat. Quia voluptatem exercitationem id.

Et in et natus dolorem. Veniam aut dicta aperiam pariatur. Asperiores aut sint ea odit accusantium inventore. In ut perferendis cum. Quasi optio facilis minus.

[Comment removed by mod team]
 

In alias iste beatae. Id iure rerum voluptatum ipsam illum.

Voluptate similique unde voluptatum dolorum perferendis ipsam quidem perspiciatis. Excepturi dolorem atque fuga eos maxime eveniet.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Id tempora tenetur consequatur qui. Natus labore et dolorem voluptates reiciendis aut suscipit. Necessitatibus rem voluptatem vel dicta est distinctio sapiente. Et possimus aspernatur velit eum asperiores. Veritatis consequatur quaerat ut laudantium inventore ut. Minus quia quaerat ut atque.

Quia et quia sunt minus aut. Aspernatur aut culpa quam assumenda qui et.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”