why doesn't HR consider a 3.39 gpa better than a 3.4?
think about it: anything above 3.35 rounds to 3.4. assuming that everyone with 3.4x writes it out instead of rounding down, that would make the expected value of a 3.4 = (3.4+3.35)/2 = 3.3753.39.
think about it: anything above 3.35 rounds to 3.4. assuming that everyone with 3.4x writes it out instead of rounding down, that would make the expected value of a 3.4 = (3.4+3.35)/2 = 3.3753.39.
| +28 | How do we get as sharp as possible? | 11 | 3d |
| +23 | What do you think of tiktoker Jinginvests | 9 | 11h |
| +15 | Upselling yourself when you’re unqualified | 2 | 3d |
| +14 | How Are Cornell 7 / GC Members Affecting Your Bank or Firm? | 5 | 4d |
| +13 | Alcoholism | 4 | 8h |
| +11 | Del | 2 | 2d |
| +10 | PWP Piper deal terminated, ruined my chances with a girl | 4 | 23h |
| +2 | Being able to DnD is God Mode | 2 | 6h |
Career Resources
Because no matter what when you write it on paper 3.40 > 3.39
I highly doubt anyone at HR has the insight or inclination to carry out the calculations you mentioned above
LoL are you serious? I give you props for your reasoning though.
i think youre ignoring this EV calculaton: (3.5 GPA+HR reading your resume)/2 = them not giving a shit either way.
The upside is not capped at 3.40, it's at 3.44, assuming everyone rounds to 1 decimal place. EV of 3.4: (3.44+3.35)/2 = 3.395 > 3.39
But agree with above posters, nobody in HR does that.
this.
The best lowest GPA to have is 3.46. Because then you can round it up to 3.5, and which then rounds up to a 4.0! You can have a perfect GPA!
Learn some maths buddy, thats not how you round numbers. You can't round on top of rounding.
Swooosh...
.
yea but see the original post - i think anyone with 3.41 to 3.44 would write it out (no reason not to), so a 3.4 will just be grades between 3.35 and 3.40
because HR will think ur a retard for not rounding a 3.39 to 3.4 and ding your resume for that reason
you're very right....i guess the lesson is always round up.
I don't think you guys understood the OP's question...
He's comparing 3.4 to 3.39, not 3.40 to 3.39. Most people with a 3.44 would not write 3.4 on their resume.
His reasoning is sound, but it doesn't change the fact that nobody actually gives a crap about a 3.4 vs 3.39
Most HR questions can be answered by looking at the caliber and type of person that makes HR a career.
why tf is this even a post
Unde explicabo explicabo provident architecto nisi. Soluta ipsam qui qui qui. Aut voluptatem nihil sit hic quos non hic. Voluptatum sint molestias quia rerum qui ipsa voluptatem nihil.
Qui culpa corrupti libero laudantium quo aut. Corporis est est quia veniam qui perferendis ullam. Qui consectetur assumenda voluptas quo sint architecto quas.
Quia quo suscipit est earum dolore provident culpa. Mollitia ut mollitia dolorum quaerat rerum nam. Voluptate nostrum aliquid voluptates eveniet excepturi et officiis. Quia deleniti cupiditate sunt assumenda itaque.
Iusto non tempora quidem quasi id. Excepturi laborum voluptates sed tempore nihil. Nostrum laboriosam laborum sint id fuga et. Fugit veniam magnam rerum ab suscipit ut. Sunt consequatur laboriosam beatae exercitationem et eligendi minima.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...