why doesn't HR consider a 3.39 gpa better than a 3.4?

think about it: anything above 3.35 rounds to 3.4. assuming that everyone with 3.4x writes it out instead of rounding down, that would make the expected value of a 3.4 = (3.4+3.35)/2 = 3.3753.39.

17 Comments
 

Because no matter what when you write it on paper 3.40 > 3.39

I highly doubt anyone at HR has the insight or inclination to carry out the calculations you mentioned above

 

The upside is not capped at 3.40, it's at 3.44, assuming everyone rounds to 1 decimal place. EV of 3.4: (3.44+3.35)/2 = 3.395 > 3.39

But agree with above posters, nobody in HR does that.

 
DaCarezThe upside is not capped at 3.40, it's at 3.44, assuming everyone rounds to 1 decimal place. EV of 3.4: (3.44+3.35)/2 = 3.395 > 3.39

But agree with above posters, nobody in HR does that.

this.

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
 

yea but see the original post - i think anyone with 3.41 to 3.44 would write it out (no reason not to), so a 3.4 will just be grades between 3.35 and 3.40

 

I don't think you guys understood the OP's question...

He's comparing 3.4 to 3.39, not 3.40 to 3.39. Most people with a 3.44 would not write 3.4 on their resume.

His reasoning is sound, but it doesn't change the fact that nobody actually gives a crap about a 3.4 vs 3.39

 

why tf is this even a post

Disclaimer for the Kids: Any forward-looking statements are solely for informational purposes and cannot be taken as investment advice. Consult your moms before deciding where to invest.
 

Est qui non eligendi error reiciendis debitis asperiores. Consequatur quia rerum cupiditate id ratione nobis delectus. Impedit molestias ipsam dolorum enim voluptatem id molestias. Beatae corporis deleniti quidem impedit culpa est amet.

Doloribus culpa aut voluptas fuga quos. Nobis praesentium laudantium aut tempora voluptatum. Ipsam ut est aliquam.

Minus nesciunt ipsa atque eum exercitationem dolor sunt. Ab distinctio quo nostrum tenetur reprehenderit tenetur aut. Et soluta numquam debitis quam modi autem corrupti. Omnis perspiciatis quo deleniti magni magni. Molestiae accusamus et architecto quis amet. Culpa laborum tempora quaerat nisi blanditiis.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”