Would you want your wife to take on your last name?

I was having a casual conversation with my current GF and some of her friends on their thoughts on marriage and the topic came up on whether or not they would take on a potential husband's last name. Every single one said she would never do it as it is an outdated tradition and would want to remain their own independent self. Personally, I had always thought it would be nice to have my potential wife take on my last name in order to be one cohesive family unit, but I had never really thought about it until they brought it up. 

I'm not looking to marry this girl (or any for that matter) anytime soon (25 here), more-so just curious on what everyone's philosophy on this is? On one hand, it doesn't seem like like that big of a deal, especially in the case of career women or those with special family situations, but I do find it funny how this particular tradition seems to have been more or less abandoned by our generation, and something as seemingly simple as changing a last name is made out to be such a big deal but yet the man is still expected to spend a certain amount on an engagement ring or make other traditional relationship-related sacrifices. 

Region
 

I am more old-fashioned than many my age. I wouldn't ask a partner to take my surname, but I would like it very much if she wanted to.

It's a sort of circular loop. Obviously a woman is her own person with her own identity and background that's completely equal in value to mine, so demanding that she give hers up is illogical. The man's last name isn't automatically the right answer.

I've worked hard to make my name something, not in terms of publicity, but rather values or mindset. If a woman sees that on her own and appreciates it or identifies with it strongly enough to choose my name voluntarily, that would be gratifying and attractive to me. It indicates a symmetry of character (values) and thinking (mindset), which I've found to be remarkably rare and therefore invaluable.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
Username_TBU

What if your partner also worked hard to "make their name something in values and mindset?" Then should she change it? Should you take hers? Not actually advocating for that, just food for thought

I would be grateful to meet someone with a similar mindset and feel fortunate to find a compatible partner. The only conversation I'd raise about names would be about the kids'.

It's illogical to say "Because I work hard for the benefit of my future family, you have to sacrifice your last name", because a partner (in my case, a wife) can work just as hard (not everything can be measured in financial contribution) or earn as much or more. I recognize that, and I believe addressed it in my comment.

My comment was less prescriptive and more unique to me. Like "I am proud of what you've worked so hard to achieve, and joining you in that where people immediately know from my name I am with you feels special." I had that once, and while I chose not to progress to a marriage in that relationship, it was very meaningful to me.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
HelloWorld47

Every single one said she would never do it as it is an outdated tradition and would want to remain their own independent self.

At least they admitted they don't believe in marriage and are looking for an easy out should they actually go through with it. Also pretty obvious they don't want kids either, so another easy flag to pass on them and avoid that debacle when that comes up.

Gotta give them credit that they let men know ahead of time they just want a smash and pass.

The poster formerly known as theAudiophile. Just turned up to 11, like the stereo.
 

They didn't say they didn't believe in marriage, just taking on the last name. Although I will admit that I have a hard time believing someone was truly committed and a genuine/quality life partner if it would be so appalling to consider it. Adds one less aspect of "skin in the game" in a society that seems to value the bond less and less. Issue is that as far as I can tell this is the current norm for the younger generations.

 

The problem with feminists is it’s not that simple. They want all the benefits of having a man while making 0 sacrifices. You better believe if a divorce happens the man is getting taken out to the cleaners irregardless of the fairness regarding how hard he worked to get the money, or the reason for divorce. Oh and you’ll need to pay up for a ring, every single vacation, meal and luxury gift that the woman wants but if you have even a simple request such as taking a last name? Now you’re part of the patriarchy.

Array
 

Yeah if a girl is straightforward that she doesn't want it, then you know it's a pump and dump & you can move on. Honestly this is not a bad outcome as you now know where the relationship is going (or rather where it isn't) 

 
Most Helpful

Mine did, it was a deal breaker.

Gentlemen.  You really don't want to be in a marriage and raise kids without a wife with your last name.  You as men have so much at stake, to protect your wife, look after he best interests and be head of the household, even if you aren't the breadwinner.  If she doesn't agree to this, she might not be the woman to want to be with someone long term.

Plus, with kids, imagine your wife not having their last name?  Now caveat is I know professional women who keep their last name for work, doctors, etc. BUT, when it comes to family they are Mrs.. so and so.

-There is always the funny anecdote where women don't want to take a "man's" last name, but they want to keep their father's last name.

 

Yep. When things are comfortable and easy in a relationship it's easy to call it 'an outdated tradition' or that 'we are equal partners' in this relationship or some BS. Let them believe that if they want, but as a man you have to know it isnt true. If when chaos happens and you turn to her in that situation you will lose respect, trust, and your family. 

As the male in a marriage you are the rock. Someone is getting sick and dying? You are the support base. There is some external danger? You are the protector. Both of you lose your jobs? You have to find the way to provide. That is your role. New age feminists try to have their cake and eat it too. But why as a man should you be willing to commit your life to your partner and your offspring if they arent even willing to commit their last name?

 

I think the point is these, for the most part, are more traditional views. Men have so much at stake, but women don't have as much at stake? Why is that? What do men have at stake that women don't (taking away money since you said the woman could be the breadwinner). You could argue that it is the opposite - if the marriage doesn't work out, many men get a second, better shot, at marriage. From a societal view, men tend to become more attractive as they age (physically, emotionally and usually financially), whereas a divorced woman over 40 has it much much harder.

How are men protecting their wives in ways that the woman is not doing the same? I honestly haven't been in a physical fight since I was 11, so this hasn't come in to play for me.

 

Being a man in a relationship is like being enclosed in the 'break in case of an emergency' glass box. No, you arent going to be getting in fights every year. But when shit goes south - and it will over the course of the relationship - you are the one that needs to lead through it

 

My husband and I took each other’s last names—combined them together. Our marriage is equal on every respect and I could not be more madly in love and devoted to him after being together for 6 years. Nor he to me. 

 

Most of the girls I have dated wanted my last name.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Bruvver Hmmmmm.... Maybe because, in the event that one partner does indeed take the other partner’s last name, it is 99.99% done the way of the women taking the man’s.... But ya go ahead and argue something that <0.01% of the population does to push your poor position. 
(In response to your reply, him saying "she's mine" is quite insecure yes haha; however, flipping the argument does not work when it's against 99.99% of common practice). 

There is more than one way to get there. I'd rather have 30 chapters than 3000 pages.
 

Based and trad-pilled

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Agree with you 100%. Too bad those commenting were feed with the feminist bullshit. No surprise that the current western world is also one where most men are sexless and virgins in their 30s.

 
Arroz con PolloLook at cultures that stress traditional roles. Indians, Asians, and Africans are so successful in America because they value education and traditional family values."

So successful? I would like to see some facts because last time I checked all these minorities (including latinos who also "value"  these traditional family values) are not doing very well

 

I am not married and there is a chance I might never be.
Had this discussion with various gfs, and the result was about 50-50. Half of them would want to change their family name, the other half would prefer to keep their own.

Personally, I wouldn't want my future wife to take my last name. Not because of some feminist theory or anything. My last name is mine and belongs to me, I don't want to give it to anyone else - I own it just like I own other things in my life.

Also, coming from a family with a lot of medical doctors, scientists and researchers - in many cases the women kept their own name also.

 

For all my people saying women who don't change their last name aren't marriage material, my parents marriage of 30+ years would like a word. But in all seriousness, I don't see this as a dealbreaker. It would be nice but its not a huge deal, especially when you are at the point in a relationship where both of you are considering spending the rest of your lives together. 

 

I think its the fact that most women doing this right now dont have good reason, they want to be "independent" of there husbands. Newsflash you should both be able to depend on each other if you are married neither of you should really strive to be "independent" of the other. 

 

If you are equally dependent on each other (which, hopefully those getting married will be), why would one party change their name based on the party's gender? I feel like there is a breakdown of logic here...

 
HelloWorld47

I was having a casual conversation with my current GF and some of her friends on their thoughts on marriage and the topic came up on whether or not they would take on a potential husband's last name. Every single one said she would never do it as it is an outdated tradition and would want to remain their own independent self. Personally, I had always thought it would be nice to have my potential wife take on my last name in order to be one cohesive family unit, but I had never really thought about it until they brought it up. 

I'm not looking to marry this girl (or any for that matter) anytime soon (25 here), more-so just curious on what everyone's philosophy on this is? On one hand, it doesn't seem like like that big of a deal, especially in the case of career women or those with special family situations, but I do find it funny how this particular tradition seems to have been more or less abandoned by our generation, and something as seemingly simple as changing a last name is made out to be such a big deal but yet the man is still expected to spend a certain amount on an engagement ring or make other traditional relationship-related sacrifices. 

God brainwashed liberals are the worst

So they dont want to take a mans name, they choose to keep .... their fathers name?

What will your kids be called? At the end of the day the male is responsible for the wellbeing of the family. Doesnt mean he has to earn the most, but when shit goes south it will be your head on the chopping block. That can mean financially, that can mean danger (what happens if your house is on fire), that can mean physically (if you are confronted with a mugger) - the least she can do is take your last name and become one family unit.

 

The least she can do is take your last name? That's the support you're looking for in all of those scenarios? Also, where do you live and what are you doing? You care about your wife changing her last name (yes hers, not her father's - it's what she was given at birth) in case of a fire or a mugging?!

Also this financial stuff keeps getting brought up. What if she's also financially supportive? What if she comes in with a trust fund?

 
MonkeyNoise

God brainwashed liberals are the worst

Better than thoughtless conservatives!

So they dont want to take a mans name, they choose to keep .... their fathers name?

No, it's their name.  You know, the name they've been known by their whole life, the one that's part of their identity, the one they've (perhaps) built a life and a career around?

What will your kids be called? At the end of the day the male is responsible for the wellbeing of the family.

Not always.  And you're touching on the justification for all of this without realizing it.  When women had no earning power and were reliant on their husband for literal sustenance, they took their husband's name.  They lost their own identity and had to forge a new one as an appurtance to their husband.

Doesnt mean he has to earn the most, but when shit goes south it will be your head on the chopping block. That can mean financially, that can mean danger (what happens if your house is on fire), that can mean physically (if you are confronted with a mugger) - the least she can do is take your last name and become one family unit.

How does not taking your last name make you less of a family unit?  Anyone who is putting this much stock into the appearance of being a family is going to be completely incapable of actually forging a family unit.

What you want is a bunch of dependents you can order around, not a family.

 
C.R.E. Shervin

I'm old, compared to college kids, I'm based in NYC, where I grew up(a liberal bastion)

Taking the husbands last name is the norm here too. Only on a handful of occasions has it not been the case.  I'm old enough to see that women use this as a shit test or virtue signaling to their friends in their early 20s. To use modern "red pill" lingo.

What the "norm" is doesn't really matter.  If someone wants to keep their name, what's the problem?  And even if women are using it to virtue signal... look at this thread!  You've got a bunch of guys, most of whom are probably teenagers or in their very early 20s and nowhere near marriage, doing the same exact thing around demanding someone take their name.

People are really bad at examining the rationale for why they do things.  Traditional does not mean sanctified.  The many sociological reasons women might have taken a husband's name 100 years ago really may not apply anymore.  If the only reason you have for why your wife should take your last name is "because that's how it's done" then you really don't have much of an argument at all.  Certainly a woman's desire to maintain a large part of her identity is a better justification than an appeal to tradition.

 

By the time your girlfriend and her friends are 32 and still unmarried because no one other than them thinks that they're special, beautiful, intelligent, brave, and worth giving the world to instead of self-absorbed and annoying af, they'll be desperate to take a dude's last name.

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 
AnalyzeANDchill

I kind of agree, funny how no women gave a crap about this until the media started pushing it and making it seem like a bad thing to take on a mans last name. In fact most actually really chased it. Being independent of your husband doesnt exactly make it seem like you are wanting to join with him forever

Being independent of your wife's name doesn't exactly make it seem like you are wanting to join her forever.

See how that works?  It's not a justification, it's idiocy.

Saying "the media" is pushing something is the last resort of small minded fools.  Maybe, just maybe, some of this has to do with the fact that women are more prevalent in the workplace, have the ability to rise higher in said workplace, and a lot of that is tied to the name around which they build their career?  You want your wife to take your name because it's a sign she's committed to you, to raising your family, that her priority is that she'll subsume her identity into yours.

Well, guess what?  Employers can understand that too.  If the explicit reason you want your wife to take your name is so she loses a piece of her own identity and independence, why wouldn't an employer also say "hey, when shit hits the fan, this woman is choosing her husband over her job" and maybe sidetrack her from any possible promotion?  And why wouldn't a woman understand that as well?

 
trustmeimanengineer

I wanted my wife to. That was like my only requirement, but I am very traditional in my approach to life. I value the XXX name continuing on. My wife balked at the idea for a bit but she also knows that of all the things to "fight" that is really a small thing. Her family name will die off as she only has a sister who doesn't plan on having kids (or get married), and she made peace with that. 

We didnt see eye to eye on this for a long time, but we also dated for like 7 years before getting engaged. She knew it was not something I was going to give in on. I am descended from past royalty in the very, very, distant past and have actual reasons for wanting to carry on the name lol. We have a coat of arms and everything.

But her family name dying out is unimportant?  You don't see the hypocrisy here, at all? 

 

my wife has not taken my last name and we've been together for 4 presidents (not all of that is marriage). quite frankly I don't care and I always thought it was a bit odd. plenty of other cultures don't do it like india, most of latin america, italy, france, etc., and since she has a beautiful italian last name I've never felt the urge to ask her to do it. 

I have plenty of clients where the wives kept their given name and it's never an issue for the kids, even less so if they come from one of the aforementioned cultures. I'm very much for tradition in the sense of monogamy, breastfeeding, no elbows on the table, men do certain things around the house and women do others (my wife is actually more traditional than me on this front), and all of that, but the name change is a uniquely anglo saxon thing, not a YOU MUST DO THIS IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A HAPPY MARRIAGE.

and as for if we talked about it beforehand, I cannot recall, I just remember saying I didn't give a shit whether or not she did

 

I get that you don't care and your wife probably didn't need to lobby to keep her last name, but did she lobby you at some point and say that it's common for women to keep their names in Italy?  My family is originally from Italy, still have a bunch of family that lives there, and grew up in an area where everyone was Italian and/or Irish, and the wife keeping their last name is definitely not a common thing in Italy or in Italian-American culture. 

Not trying to be a dick - just genuinely curious where that notion came from.

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 

my notion is not from them, it's from my experience working with various clients from India, Spain, Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Italy, and France. some did take their spouses name, but they were in the minority. perhaps it's regional, or if google is correct, perhaps it's for legal reasons (women aren't allowed to change their surname after marriage, just add on the husband's) - https://time.com/3940094/maiden-married-names-countries/

but nah, it wasn't any pressure from the in laws, and actually I'm the odd man out there, my only point was that it's not as uncommon as people may perceive and in some cultures (perhaps Italy less so than Spain or Brazil) it's actually rarer for the wife to take the husband's name. look no further than the king and queen of Spain, she doesn't have any of his names

 

My wife also didn't take my last name. She comes from a different culture and was just really attached to it as she had to leave behind basically everything else from her home country. Our kid has my last name.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
 

Why don’t you take her name? To show you want to be “one family”. There are some pretty strong (and to me ridiculous, but realize everyone is different) views here, including lots of assumptions and what to me comes off as negative views of women (women can also make money, shocking). 

I didn’t care about the name. My wife is successful, has a career and wants to keep her name, great. She doesn’t need me in life, she wants to be with me (and vice versa), and that’s all I need. So many people here are focused on these notion that women are somehow dependent on men, I’ve never had that be the case in any relationship I’ve been in. 

 

If my wife doesnt want my name specifically because she wants to be "independent" of me that's not a good sign. We are doing nothing but dating then, why marry at that point? I want her to take my name specifically because of religious reasons but if she is hell bent against that just because it looks a certain way then Id never marry her anyway. The fact that anyone would respond to such a thing with " well why dont you take mine" is petty and I would never consider them because that is a women with a clear mission of being seen as separate from her husband not together. 

 

Yeah if she's not willing to take your last name, she's not willing to make any level of real compromise in your future marriage. Though such signs should become apparent far before you even need to have a conversation on this while you're dating

 

Truly didn't care. Not sure why I would. A word on a document doesn't define values, our communication, etc. I honestly felt similarly (though less so) about even getting married (very happy we did).

My wife ended up taking my last name. It was important to her to go through the motions of "we are a family." And I get it. But again, when I asked her if she would change her last name, and she said yes, my response was okay, cool, whatever you want.

When you have kids, having the same last name does make it 100x easier. If she were to travel alone with them, she would need documentation showing she was their mother. Having the same last name for school purposes simplifies the process, etc.

She kept her last name for work / professional.

My personal view is if it means so much to you for her to take your last name, you should be asking yourself why and analyzing that reason

 
Username_TBU

When you have kids, having the same last name does make it 100x easier. If she were to travel alone with them, she would need documentation showing she was their mother. Having the same last name for school purposes simplifies the process, etc.

This is a really good point. My mom kept her last name and told me this was a common issue at my school when I was a kid so she hyphenated it. I didn't realize this why until I was older. 

 

From what I know (as someone in their 20s in NYC), this is no longer the norm but the exception. Hence why I was curious to see what everyone thinks. I tend to agree with your point but seems like some of the social changes in the younger generations paint a different reality.

 
OwwMyFeelingsBro you are hanging out with the wrong women...All my married couple friends had the wive take the last name of the man and it was no issue.

But who cares?  Why do you even care if your wife takes your last name?  What does that add to your life or your happiness?

This is what I don't understand.  If you (generically) are getting that much pleasure from your wife taking your last name, then maybe examine why that is.  Why should it matter?  It has nothing to do with you!

 

Ozy you are such a massive simp. Here you are with like 20 comments stating that it's the root of all evil that a woman should take a man's last name when they get married...seriously, is Drumpfy your alternate account? I could see how a guy who feels the need to post 20x on one page would also make alternate accounts spouting the same feminist, soy boy ideology in hopes that it'll get them laid

 

Shit, I almost called off the wedding when she balked at taking my first name too.  Also got her to change her middle name so the initials would be the same.  The synergies with monogrammed clothing alone is worth it.  Also, make sure you get that dowry, wives are a serious financial burden.

 

So many garbage takes here. I don't care either way, but I just don't see the point of changing a name. Like what is the reason for women to do it? How is someone a "man-hater" if they simply want to keep the name they always had. It is so weird that we want women to change their legal identity to get married. You can still have defined and traditional gender roles without a name change a la latin america and other places if that is important. It is also extremely reasonable that someone who had a 20-30 year identity wouldn't want to shed that, and I can't imagine shedding my identity either. There don't seem to be many reasons to change names apart from having a cohesive family unit when kids are involved, and with the prevalence of divorce, a name seems the least of our worries on that societal front.... 

 

Cupiditate est et voluptatem amet. Dolore enim reprehenderit maxime porro.

Magnam itaque eos amet sequi voluptatem magni aperiam. Sapiente enim amet repellendus dolor et eos.

Minus necessitatibus laboriosam ipsa ipsum modi. Alias a blanditiis occaecati et rem omnis. Eos aut in voluptates in voluptatum quaerat aut.

 

Quo quae praesentium libero incidunt consequatur veniam ipsum rerum. Consectetur et sequi omnis qui. Quo ut ab perferendis architecto et sequi sunt assumenda.

Dignissimos praesentium et ducimus omnis aut quia. Ab quidem perferendis eos esse et in. Quam excepturi reiciendis autem voluptas et. Dolores dolorem amet illum.

Sed sed quo aut alias atque sunt. Et expedita aut deserunt aperiam sint alias. Sit consectetur optio optio. Quis nam voluptatem dolor voluptas consequatur quia sint.

Quos et molestias veniam. Omnis labore soluta ut facilis est asperiores. Sapiente aut repudiandae et nulla consequatur odit consequuntur dolorem. Exercitationem ratione et impedit assumenda nostrum consectetur. Molestiae non consequatur doloremque quos. Iure facilis odit omnis assumenda nobis eum enim.

 

Tenetur rem tenetur dolorum nostrum animi voluptatem rerum. Dolorem eum blanditiis consequatur dolores saepe eos.

A laboriosam vel in provident architecto. Aut distinctio sunt molestiae dicta. Totam dolorem quia nesciunt molestiae tempora rem delectus. Tempora nisi aut nihil illum sit quia. Nostrum laudantium vero dolorum maxime. Sint ipsa libero quae et quod consequatur. Porro voluptas quae aut autem voluptatem mollitia porro.

 

Nesciunt quia reiciendis error repudiandae nobis totam eveniet odit. Nemo veniam corrupti totam eos est ab rerum. Quis eum expedita autem possimus vitae quo assumenda. Quod fuga enim et suscipit quisquam accusantium perferendis voluptates.

Eveniet consequuntur aut id est. Et aut ipsa libero id laboriosam numquam. Et ea asperiores voluptate cum.

Est aut alias mollitia sapiente nihil. Id voluptatem architecto et sapiente esse nisi aut. Deleniti eum repudiandae facilis consequatur fuga autem sint et. Id placeat consequatur eligendi ipsam. Eum nam possimus excepturi architecto dolore ex.

 

Distinctio quasi qui voluptatem blanditiis fuga. Atque possimus consequatur dolorum est esse aliquid rerum.

Voluptatibus illo corrupti vero nemo ea assumenda cum. Aut tempora beatae ut corporis.

Labore voluptate distinctio quia quasi quia ipsam. Sed sequi facilis perspiciatis cumque. Itaque consequatur quia quasi cupiditate sint et. Accusantium omnis officia dolor id. Quae quaerat eaque ut quod aut earum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”