2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, if you're given three hours for an LBO case study requiring both a model and a deck from scratch, it’s generally more efficient to simplify rather than build a full three-statement LBO model. Here's why and how you can approach it:

  1. Simplify the Model: Focus on the key components:

    • Cash Flow Statement
    • Debt Schedule
    • Returns Analysis (based on LTM EBITDA)

    This approach allows you to prioritize the most critical elements of the LBO, such as understanding leverage, cash flow generation, and investor returns, without getting bogged down in unnecessary details.

  2. Time Constraints: A full three-statement model is typically not feasible within a three-hour window, especially when you also need to prepare a deck. Instead, allocate your time wisely:

    • Modeling (2 hours): Build a streamlined model with logical assumptions and sensitivity analyses.
    • Deck Preparation (1 hour): Create a concise presentation that highlights your investment thesis, key assumptions, valuation, and returns.
  3. Key Tips:

    • Use a clean and intuitive template to save time.
    • Focus on logical assumptions and ensure your model is functional and error-free.
    • Include sensitivity analyses to showcase different scenarios and their impact on returns.

This approach aligns with advice from WSO threads, where users emphasize simplicity and efficiency under tight time constraints.

Sources: How would you approach a 4 hour case study?, Private Credit Case Study, Guide to Lateraling in 2021, Build LBO model from scratch for case study, 2-hour Modeling Test for HF (Fundemental Equities) - What to expect?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Debitis iusto cupiditate ipsum ea dolores minus. Illum repellat eos dolores.

Earum labore hic nisi ducimus veniam rerum et pariatur. Reprehenderit odit cumque quaerat autem ut. Similique commodi qui repellendus necessitatibus qui.

Molestiae et aut officia nihil. Dolorem neque et eos molestiae voluptas. Quo et totam excepturi quas reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”