DCF Myth 1: If you have a D(discount rate) and a CF (cash flow), you have a DCF!
Mod Note (Andy) - as the year comes to an end we're reposting the top discussions from 2015, this one ranks #35 and was originally posted 2/24/2015.
Earlier this year, I started my series on discounted cash flow valuations (DCF) with a post that listed ten common myths in DCF and promised to do a post on each one over the course of the year. This is the first of that series and I will use it to challenge the widely held misconception that all you need to arrive at a DCF value is a D(iscount rate) and expected C(ash)F(lows). In this post, I will take a tour of what I would term twisted DCFs, where you have the appearance of a discounted cash flow valuation, without any of the consistency or philosophy.
- Equity versus Business (Firm): If the cash flows are after debt payments (and thus cash flows to equity), the discount rate used has to reflect the return required by those equity investors (the cost of equity), given the perceived risk in their equity investments. If the cash flows are prior to debt payments (cash flows to the business or firm), the discount rate used has to be a weighted average of what your equity investors want and what your lenders (debt holders) demand or a cost of funding the entire business (cost of capital).
- Pre-tax versus Post-tax: If your cash flows are pre-tax (post-tax), your discount rate has to be pre-tax (post-tax). It is worth noting that when valuing companies, we look at cash flows after corporate taxes and prior to personal taxes and discount rates are defined consistently. This gets tricky when valuing pass-through entities, which pay no taxes but are often required to pass through their income to investors who then get taxed at individual tax rates, and I looked at this question in my post on pass-through entities.
- Nominal versus Real: If your cash flows are computed without incorporating inflation expectations, they are real cash flows and have to be discounted at a real discount rate. If your cash flows incorporate an expected inflation rate, your discount rate has to incorporate the same expected inflation rate.
- Currency: If your cash flows are in a specific currency, your discount rate has to be in the same currency. Since currency is primarily a conduit for expected inflation, choosing a high inflation currency (say the Brazilian Reai) will give you a higher discount rate and higher expected growth and should leave value unchanged.
- The Chimera DCF: In mythology, a chimera is usually depicted as a lion, with the head of a goat arising from his back, and a tail that might end with a snake's head. A DCF valuation that mixes dollar cash flows with peso discount rates, nominal cash flows with real costs of capital and cash flows before debt payments with costs of equity is violating basic consistency rules and qualifies as a Chimera DCF. It is useless, no matter how much work went into estimating the cash flows and discount rates. While it is possible that these inconsistencies are the result of deliberate intent (where you are trying to justify an unjustifiable value), they are more often the result of sloppiness and too many analysts working on the same valuation, with division of labor run amok.
- The Dreamstate DCF: It is easy to build amazing companies on spreadsheets, making outlandish assumptions about growth and operating margins over time. With attribution to Elon
Musk, I could take a small, money losing automobile company, forecast enough revenue
growth to get its revenues to $350 billion in ten years (about $100 billion higher than Toyota or Volkswagen, the largest automobile companies today), increase operating margins to 10% by the tenth year (giving it the margins of premium auto makers) and make it a low risk, high growth company at that point (allowing it to trade at 20 times earnings at the end of year 10), all on a spreadsheet. Dreamstate DCFs are usually the result of a combination of hubris and static analysis, where you assume that you act correctly and no one else does.
- The Dissonant DCF: When assumptions about growth, risk and cash flows are not consistent with each other, with little or no explanation given for the mismatch, you have a DCF valuation
where the assumptions are at war with each other and your valuation error will reflect the input
dissonance. An analyst who assumes high growth with low risk and low reinvestment will get too high a value, and one who assumes low growth with high risk and high reinvestment will get too low a value. I attributed dissonant DCFs to the natural tendency of analysts to focus on one variable at a time and tweak it, when in fact changes in one variable (say, growth) affect the other variables in your assessment. In addition, if you have a bias (towards a higher or lower value), you will find a variable to change that will deliver the result you want.
- The Trojan Horse (or Drag Queen) DCF: It is undeniable that the biggest number in a DCF is the terminal value, and for it to remain a DCF (a measure of intrinsic value), that number has to be estimated in one of two ways. The first is to assume that your cash flows will continue
beyond the terminal year, growing at a constant rate forever (or for a finite period) and the second is to assume liquidation, with the liquidation proceeds representing your terminal value. There are many DCFs, though, where the terminal value is estimated by applying a multiple to the terminal year’s revenues, book value or earnings and that multiple (PE, EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA) comes from how comparable firms are being priced right now. Just as the Greeks used a wooden horse to smuggle soldiers into Troy, analysts are using the Trojan horse of expected cash flows (during the estimation period) to smuggle in a pricing. One reason analysts feel the urge to disguise their pricing as DCF valuations is a reluctance to admit that you are playing the pricing game.
- The Kabuki of For-show DCF: The last three decades have seen an explosion in valuations for legal and accounting purposes. Since neither the courts nor accounting rule writers have a clear
sense of what they want as output from this process (and it has little to do with fair value), and there are generally no transactions that ride on the numbers (making them "show" valuations), you get checkbox or rule-driven valuation. In its most pristine form, these valuations are works of art, where analyst and rule maker (or court) go through the motions of valuation, with the intent of developing models that are legally or accounting-rule defensible rather than yielding reasonable values. Until we resolve the fundamental contradiction of asking practitioners to price assets, while also asking them to deliver DCF models that back the prices, we will see more and more Kabuki DCFs.
- The Robo DCF: In a Robo DCF, the analyst build a valuation almost entirely from the most recent financial statements and automated forecasts. In its most extreme form, every input in a
Robo DCF can be traced to an external source, with equity risk premiums from Ibbotson or Duff and Phelps, betas from Bloomberg and cash flows from Factset, coming together in the model to deliver a value. Given that computers are much better followers of rigid and automated rules than human beings can, it is not surprising that many services (Bloomberg, Morningstar) have created their own versions of Robo DCFs to do intrinsic valuations. In fact, you could probably create an app for a smartphone or tablet that could do valuations for you..
- The Mutant DCF: In its scariest form, a DCF can be just a collection of numbers where items have familiar names (free cash flow, cost of capital) but the analyst putting it together has
neither a narrative holding the numbers together nor a sense of the basic principles of valuation. In the best case scenario, these valuations never see the light of day, as their creators abandon their misshapen creations, but in many cases, these valuations find their way into acquisition valuations, appraisals and portfolio management.
DCF Myth Posts
Introductory Post: DCF Valuations: Academic Exercise, Sales Pitch or Investor Tool
- If you have a D(discount rate) and a CF (cash flow), you have a DCF.
- A DCF is an exercise in modeling & number crunching.
- You cannot do a DCF when there is too much uncertainty.
- The most critical input in a DCF is the discount rate and if you don’t believe in modern portfolio theory (or beta), you cannot use a DCF.
- If most of your value in a DCF comes from the terminal value, there is something wrong with your DCF.
- A DCF requires too many assumptions and can be manipulated to yield any value you want.
- A DCF cannot value brand name or other intangibles.
- A DCF yields a conservative estimate of value.
- If your DCF value changes significantly over time, there is either something wrong with your valuation.
- A DCF is an academic exercise.
Repudiandae ut quo recusandae nostrum et. Molestiae doloribus nihil a commodi quaerat debitis. Sint enim cum magnam at doloremque. Odio dolores veritatis consequatur. Blanditiis recusandae sed consequuntur aliquam maxime perspiciatis voluptates ipsam.
Eum consequuntur at nihil aut optio. Molestias quisquam eveniet excepturi facilis voluptatibus aperiam qui. Incidunt repudiandae iusto tempore. Eius dolorem deleniti quo voluptate quasi sunt. Iusto eum ut sit eum molestiae doloremque unde.
Provident ex ex enim vitae quia. Dolorem et error quasi sit expedita.
Aut impedit explicabo quidem ex laudantium facilis est. Eos ut aut asperiores doloremque molestiae cumque. Inventore exercitationem ab enim sed rem numquam et. Accusamus explicabo ullam et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Est voluptatem et cumque. Repellat aliquam dolorem omnis autem incidunt laudantium odio. Aliquam et voluptas numquam. Eum fugiat id dolore doloremque ratione. Dolor aliquam voluptatem doloribus nihil.
Ad consequatur possimus mollitia commodi. Placeat ea vitae corrupti ut qui dicta. Neque inventore modi quo aut animi placeat facilis. Sapiente aliquam voluptatem dolorem dignissimos cumque animi inventore quasi. Pariatur neque itaque ratione iusto fuga.
Iure numquam omnis voluptatum ipsum velit explicabo. Possimus unde et laudantium reprehenderit. Laborum tempore rerum nemo non.
Minima est sit omnis earum blanditiis quia odio. Quis ut tenetur sunt dolorum. Laborum et minima quia molestiae doloribus similique.
Eos nihil est nostrum ex nihil voluptas quis. Enim ea temporibus voluptatibus aut aliquid iusto minus. Est et aut quis. Rerum vitae qui qui dolorem distinctio. Inventore nisi in neque reprehenderit. At placeat voluptate consequatur quia in et.
Facere quis ullam tempora qui quos natus quaerat asperiores. Eum ipsam cumque similique nihil harum cupiditate vero. Adipisci quidem mollitia unde deleniti. Et nam sed eligendi reprehenderit.
Et ut nihil velit quia odio est sit. Modi rerum aut tempore odio eos aut. A et voluptatem repudiandae quia. Consectetur eaque voluptatem aperiam in quibusdam minima.
Rerum ut enim ratione deleniti et dolor omnis sed. Magnam fugiat blanditiis qui impedit.
Modi ea rem ut ea temporibus ratione ratione. Eum itaque atque reprehenderit doloribus perferendis rerum ipsa dolor. Et nobis labore pariatur qui accusantium. Rerum laboriosam eum quasi voluptas.
Illum nihil nemo ad. Libero vero qui unde sint rem. Et eligendi tenetur rerum eligendi error quo. Amet dolores libero sed.
Officiis dolorem error quia fuga aut earum. Iusto natus sequi eos debitis consequatur fugit architecto velit. Praesentium molestiae sed nemo quia cumque vero.
Ipsa expedita sapiente exercitationem nihil accusantium omnis velit. Quos quod quo id illo vel. Consequatur quibusdam sapiente modi facere minima in.
Non quaerat dolorem doloremque et voluptatem libero voluptatum. Mollitia voluptatem nisi distinctio rerum possimus expedita.
Omnis ipsa eum dignissimos minima quae. Magni necessitatibus est eveniet. Totam perspiciatis provident fugiat dolorem possimus voluptatum accusamus. Tempore adipisci ipsum itaque quia mollitia suscipit. Et ut qui minus eos. Omnis in quas beatae debitis quia.
Rerum explicabo sit quia veritatis voluptatem unde sequi quibusdam. Ad ut voluptas consequuntur suscipit optio quisquam et laboriosam. Earum voluptatem et labore corrupti unde est ipsam. Nobis itaque voluptas corporis dolorem sit porro.
Cum porro quibusdam qui ullam. Rerum voluptatem et eos in blanditiis fuga rerum possimus. Fuga atque repudiandae veritatis dolor iusto neque voluptatem. Voluptas dolores non dolores ad. Autem velit quam in voluptas quam et. Qui quibusdam in quo et vitae animi.
Harum ad sed voluptatem officia totam consequuntur odio explicabo. Perferendis ex nulla fugit voluptatem. Asperiores velit laborum sunt ipsa qui et.
At eum est natus unde qui. Recusandae sunt vitae quo aperiam. Ut nisi sapiente occaecati enim ut et. Doloribus rerum et necessitatibus non aut. Totam rerum sed harum nam pariatur eius.
Necessitatibus deserunt est dignissimos atque recusandae delectus animi. Eos facere incidunt recusandae molestias nam id repellendus illo.
Doloremque nemo est eaque ex. A eos sed ea optio autem. Dolore quo ut molestias neque expedita.
Totam consequuntur aspernatur necessitatibus et accusamus a est. Qui nisi voluptatem quis sit explicabo deserunt. Odit magnam recusandae aut eos ab veritatis minima. Omnis fugiat harum et consequuntur.
Est qui non soluta nulla. Dolorum reprehenderit ea ipsam tenetur ratione. Neque dolor est nam et. Quo fugiat et illo nemo qui illum. Pariatur iste et voluptatem consequatur labore.
Quis veniam aperiam deleniti esse vel nisi est. Exercitationem ad et voluptates ea voluptatibus consequatur. Temporibus quae in earum quaerat sit est qui. Voluptatum et excepturi aperiam minima. Numquam dignissimos voluptas sit aut placeat necessitatibus harum.
Quas amet autem ut quasi facere sapiente distinctio. Natus similique accusantium possimus doloremque nihil. Aliquid recusandae est reiciendis consequatur. Praesentium vitae eos nulla est eveniet unde aut.
Et numquam quo ut. Sequi harum reprehenderit dolorum et ut. Quos qui doloribus doloribus ut et minus. Est recusandae aut in vero.
Sapiente in sit esse magnam inventore. Facilis culpa iste repellat a labore omnis excepturi. Blanditiis commodi excepturi magni voluptas. Dolorem error harum maxime. Rerum dolorem placeat et sint eius sunt.
Et voluptatem aliquid error voluptatibus. Qui assumenda ut voluptas ut inventore consectetur et id. Praesentium eaque molestias minus tempore. Illo necessitatibus est occaecati exercitationem. Amet aperiam fugit aliquam est.
Enim quasi sit unde. Autem fugiat voluptatum ab qui ex ad iure. Aut placeat rerum occaecati architecto voluptas placeat. Est quo sunt et est animi. Non sint in placeat quidem exercitationem. Eligendi id sed deserunt deleniti libero. Perferendis expedita maxime accusantium dolorem saepe.
Officia commodi amet quae optio qui delectus numquam. Doloribus ut earum beatae dolorum et enim. Et quisquam necessitatibus dolorum ratione veniam dolor esse.
Nobis similique ducimus excepturi amet architecto et placeat. Sit voluptas aut in esse architecto voluptas architecto. Qui recusandae omnis consequatur aut cumque velit illo. Iure enim nam error. Ducimus beatae odit est quia est. Eum ipsum consequuntur sequi consequatur aut ea.
Quo consequuntur magnam error numquam debitis perspiciatis ut. Accusamus necessitatibus vel voluptatem velit modi repellendus distinctio. Qui veritatis et sit ut enim laudantium earum.
Laudantium qui culpa facere qui quis accusamus doloremque. Omnis et at ea nulla nostrum est perspiciatis. Id excepturi dolor aut quam dignissimos est a. Est aperiam sint numquam ea deleniti.
Vel aliquid quis magni aliquid facere sunt. Vel facilis aut sunt vero id nam tenetur. Expedita blanditiis iste labore qui at consectetur reiciendis. Pariatur quas rerum et.
Quibusdam accusamus ullam consequatur cumque aut omnis. Aut tenetur cupiditate perferendis id est autem. Sed aut quia quos unde impedit exercitationem. Aut dolorem cum rem blanditiis non nostrum.