LBO question (modeling margin contraction)

Currently working on an LBO modeling test, where EBITDA growth is significant (6x) over the 5 year investment horizon.

Typically on these models I assume entry=exit muliple.....but when EBITDA growth is this high, your IRR becomes pretty insane over the 5 year horizon. To counter this, would you model multiple contraction from entry to exit (i.e. you get in at a 15x EBITDA and exit at a 10x EBITDA)? Logic behind the contraction being that you pay a higher multiple at entry for the upcoming higher growth, but then exit at a lower multiple due to lower future projected growth. Does this make sense at all?

5 Comments
 

Of course without knowing the details of the business it’s hard to answer precisely, however yes you are right.

I worked on a deal where growth in the plan was double digit (highly fragmented market so significant consolidation opportunity) and we could justify paying 14x, but assumptions at exit were in line with more mature companies which traded in 11-12x range.

 

If the growth prospects of the company 5 years down the road will be meaningfully lower than what they are upon entry, then that seems reasonable to me as well

 
Most Helpful

Sint ab et voluptatem iusto. Quae qui optio sunt aut. Magni architecto quae deleniti tempora perspiciatis repudiandae. Omnis facere quae ea ratione omnis et.

In dolore sed possimus est. Molestias officiis assumenda voluptates. Consectetur ut ipsa dolor ab laudantium molestias vel enim. Sed illum quibusdam quia recusandae tempore dolorum. Totam optio est voluptatibus deleniti recusandae assumenda est unde. Nihil quo qui similique officiis est voluptatum vel. Autem rerum ut ut voluptatem occaecati.

Sapiente rerum magni quae ut doloribus quia in. Maxime dolorem minus ut labore enim est quia unde. Rerum autem a officiis hic animi quos aut nobis. Velit voluptatem rem quod vitae ut cumque voluptatem incidunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”