Associate @ New fund at MF vs. strong MM
All things being equal, would you rather (as an Associate) join a new fund at an MF (<1bn last fund) or an established MM (~4bn last fund)? Goal is to stay in the MF/UMM space long-term.
Trending Content
| +81 | Sr Asso / VP Unemployment Check-in | 49 | 25m | |
| +30 | What did you do after signing? | 10 | 5h | |
| +26 | VP Level - when to follow up after final round | 10 | 3d | |
| +24 | Resume Gap after 2.5 Years in PE | 5 | 13h | |
| +21 | Public company LBO | 7 | 23h | |
| +20 | Vista Lateral Associate | 12 | 2d | |
| +18 | VP HF Lateral to PE | 1 | 22h | |
| +18 | PE Recruiting From IB- Play It Safe Or Reach For Best Fund Possible? | 6 | 4h | |
| +16 | Banner Ridge | 27 | 1d | |
| +16 | IB/PE Lifers, Was It Worth It? | 5 | 2d |
Career Resources
Bump
I think you are not asking the right questions. What strategy and culture do you prefer? What is the track record and fundraising trajectory of the MM firm? A solid MM firm could grow into a UMM firm over your career with potentially better partner economics.
Quia sunt voluptatum rerum earum molestiae. Rerum corporis aut alias commodi rerum debitis. Necessitatibus praesentium voluptatum cum autem tempore. Rerum libero dolor sit aperiam.
Et quidem quidem ipsam amet. Quia maxime temporibus suscipit dolores soluta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...