“PE” at a hedge fund?

What does the “private team” at a large hedge fund like Viking or Baupost look like? Talking to a few HHs and they seem to be attractive roles (good comp, less bureaucracy and faster promos than my current fund, etc) but I still don’t really understand what they’re actually doing. Is it classic LBOs? Would be surprised since I never really see them in processes. Or is it more coinvest, minorities, etc? Know the Tigers of the world are just doing high flying growth equity but curious if any of the large hedge fund platforms are doing anything more interesting. At a MF now and the promotion path ahead of me is brutal so trying to see what else is out there.

15 Comments
 

Completely firm dependent. 

At Elliott it is a true buyout team; they own Nielsen, Barnes & Noble, and a few others I can’t recall.

At Coatue or Atreides or D1 or Lone Pine, it’s more of a growth equity role in very large private companies such as xAI, SpaceX, Anthropic, Databricks, etc, with some earlier stage stuff sprinkled in.

 

Anonymous Monkey:

Completely firm dependent. 

At Elliott it is a true buyout team; they own Nielsen, Barnes & Noble, and a few others I can’t recall.



At Coatue or Atreides or D1 or Lone Pine, it’s more of a growth equity role in very large private companies such as xAI, SpaceX, Anthropic, Databricks, etc, with some earlier stage stuff sprinkled in.




D1 just rose a 1bn buyout for MM but agreed it’s mostly growth equity

 

It’s not LBOs in the classic MF sense. The private teams at HFs are usually doing opportunistic, flexible capital (sexy term for hybrid debt and quasi-equity) across situations that don’t really fit into a rigid PE box (which you would find in MF PE). A couple ideas that come to mind are structured minority deals, PIPEs, hybrids, growth-y rounds, rescue financings, or hard carve-outs rather than running a full auction LBO playbook (which as you know tends to drive prices increasingly high). They don’t want to get into battle against the MFs because they’d lose on price and obviously expertise, so they focus on situations where their speed, flexibility, and permanent capital are advantages. I've seen a few private teams from HF actually carve out and become turnaround PE firms.

From the deals I’ve seen on the other side, it was mostly restructuring-type situations or highly synergetic angles where they had low-hanging fruit and a pretty hard investment thesis. That’s where they can really differentiate.

Baupost for example is well known for structured/complex deals where you need creativity around downside protection and a mix of financial products you would never see in MF PE (although prefs have been around for a while now), while Viking has leaned more into growth equity/crossover style. You’ll also see them co-invest in club deals, but usually in off-market settings or when their public-market insights give them an angle (strong public to private angles that surely gives an edge, especially if they have been in the company for a while, climbing ownership). I had some of them as co-investors in a few deals and their DD is usually 5 days (we were looking for external LPs especially as the context of the deal was not your typical LBO).

Comp can be very strong and the org structures are flatter than the MFs, so I agree with you. The flip side is the deal flow is mostly opportunistic, so you won’t get the same volume and process reps as at a MF.

 

Thank you for the insightful response. Do these teams prefer any specific background? Rx, value oriented pe, distressed pe, etc I imagine? Or are they flexible and could take BB/EB IB folks too? Finally, any suggestions re post-mba roles that could help a graduate converge into one of these seats later on? Thank you! 

 
Most Helpful

Viking PE is mostly thematic, mostly MM/LMM and quite hands-off (they don't get operationally involved at all).  They don't have an army of associates because the diligence is lighter and more targeted and because they tend to make many small bets on a theme rather than writing huge equity checks into complex situations.  This is a selling point for working there; it's PE with more of a HF lifestyle except much more outward facing (they avoid banked processes so it's a lot of cold outreach to founders/family owners/CEOs etc).  On the flip side the dealmaking experience looks a lot more like LMM than MF (which may be good or bad depending on how you view it).  The other potential problem with these big SMs is succession concerns - some of them have more structured privates teams than others but none has really gone through a leadership transition so hard to say what that ultimately becomes.  Source: I interviewed there.

 

Different from OP that created the comment but agree with everything you said. Also interviewed with Viking PE and it was an immediate no for me when they told me they don't hire associates. Seemed like sharp people with a good track but even if its 'LMM' deals seems like terrible WLB without any junior support. 

Dude that interviewed me also seemed to be gassed fwiw

 

Anyone know anything about Emblem, the new fund founded by the ex-Baupost guys?

 

Qui voluptas ratione sint amet officiis quis cumque. Fugiat ut odio ab exercitationem dolor dolor voluptas non. Iste ab minus perferendis. Aut ad alias dignissimos possimus quis natus reprehenderit nihil. Rem fugit consequatur sed ea est rerum. Maiores dolore illo molestiae laudantium rerum.

Velit eveniet ea aut ab quo molestias iusto. Quae nemo ad harum sint ipsum.

Vero et iste nisi ullam exercitationem ab et. Dolor quo ea minima omnis. Eos doloribus est repellendus consectetur. Distinctio ut ut rem voluptatem incidunt amet. Libero dolorem modi dolore nesciunt sit facilis perferendis rerum. Soluta maxime occaecati deserunt sed. Quam recusandae officia dolorum vitae laudantium ipsa accusantium.

Sequi laborum molestiae consequatur. Fuga qui sed consequatur voluptas. Laborum et voluptas quod voluptatum. Eum labore itaque magnam libero eos consequatur nemo. Qui est consectetur quaerat dolorum consectetur suscipit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”