PE Funds With the Best Partner Economics

Hello! Curious to understand what’s the best way to assess a fund’s per head economics reflecting fund size, investment professional headcount, hierarchy, non-investment professional headcount, and public ownership vs private. For example, a fund might be >$15B in size but managed by 50+ partners and 100+ directors / principals and need to share economics with the public shareholders, resulting smaller carry split / head, while a $5B fund might only have 5 partners, 5 principals, and is privately owned. What’s the best way to assess the economic potential of a VP+ seat of a given fund?

Thanks

16 Comments
 

Ur in luck. There is this little tool called google where u can search up a fund’s latest size AND how many partners there are (may need to navigate to the funds website and click on “peoples”).

 
Most Helpful

This is actually a terrible and unnecessarily snarky answer because so many factors play into partner economics. Whether the fund is public or private plays a role, sometimes economics are tied up with founders or chairmans, other times it’s just completely flat.

Google wouldn’t be able to get you this answer just by counting people on a team page, you’d need to know way more about the carry structure from within the fund

 

Very hard to tell. How much the founder/CEO takes is a significant factor and that is challenging to DD from the outside. If it's a smaller firm, I'd look at (i) number of senior IP's (VP+), (ii) fund size / activity / returns (if available) and (iii) how long the partners have been together. 

People get fixated on huge $bn funds but there are many $500-$750m funds that only need a handful of people to operate. It can be very lucrative to get into one of those seats.  

 

Like a comment above, there are an incredible amount of factors that go into play:

Public vs Private: Blackstone, KKR, APO - half of their carry effectively gets shot out to shareholders, so definitely more carry potential in terms of $ amount at a private firm

Founder presence: Firms like BX and Clearlake for example - still have their Founder, CEO, and President around, which take a large chunk of the carry until they finally step down or into some carry-less advisor role. Schwarzman’s take home pay last year was nearly 1 billion dollars. And I would imagine Feliciano still takes the lion’s share of carry.

Returns: duh

AUM Growth: Thoma Bravo, Vista Equity, Bain Capital, and Warburg Pincus are all privately held. But it’s clear TB/Vista are growing and deploying much quicker than Bain/WP - likely better economics for the partners at the former two

Those are just some of the 999 factors that play a role and can somewhat be quantified … plenty more to go around, and pretty difficult to tell from the outside for any fund. In all likelihood it’s not like anyone can shop around megafund offers at that level.

 

I am not going to give you specific fund names (although I know the details of many), but here is the general concept. There are 2 views of succession: 1. Founding partners cash out via IPO or GP stakes deal or 2. The firm operates like a law firm and with each new fund junior partners own more and senior partners own less. You want to be in latter. Equally important is fundraising momentum and actual performance. There are some UMM funds where partners make way more than any non-founders in MF because of the trifecta of good partner economics, growing AUM, and strong returns.

 

How do you even find out if your fund (or any fund for that matter) falls in bucket 1 or 2? Just through word of mouth and contacts?

 

Eos nesciunt deserunt debitis aliquam iure sed. Eos non quas fugiat quaerat recusandae. At nam beatae sit aut quia non dolores. Possimus nemo unde dolorem corrupti provident molestiae.

Consequatur occaecati magni adipisci eaque qui. Illum rerum illum quas veniam totam enim id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”