PE in a crisis: lessons learned

The PE industry is showing signs of recovery after 3 or so years in the doldrums. See below for a few slides I presented last night that 1) highlight the disconnect in private and public markets in recent times, and 2) provide a view on US government policy relative to global LBO activity over the last 25 years.

Main takeaways: AI has caught a bid, while the rest of public and private markets have not. And: we probably should have seen inflation coming. If there was ever a time for discipline and stronger risk management in PE, it would have been to quell animal spirits in '21 & '22. See below each picture for additional commentary.

This chart overlays the S&P 500 on annual industry-wide LBO deployment since 1999. What is interesting is the divergence over the last 4 years, following a bull run in both public and private markets since the GFC. I included actual EV/EBITDA metrics for reference. AI and interest rates levels are plausible explanations for the deviation... which certainly can't last forever. Which leads me to my favorite chart from last night's session --> 

Looking at the chart above, you can consider US monetary policy in an accommodative position anytime the orange line is above the green line... and the wider the gap, the more accomodative. The orange line reflects quantitative easing (i.e., the purchase of private loans by the Federal Reserve) while the green line is the Fed Funds rate.

When coupled with fiscal stimulus, it seems unsurprising that 1) PE firms went set new highs in annual deployment in '21 and '22, as the world was awash in cheap liquidity, and 2) inflation followed shortly thereafter. Note, the fiscal stimulus shown in the graph is above average growth in fiscal spending at any point over the last few decades... so the figures shown on the graph are on top of what we would see in "normal" US government spending.

1 Comments
 

In ut porro animi eveniet quae non. Placeat nihil saepe provident delectus. Voluptatem voluptatum est consequatur est dignissimos saepe perferendis ratione. Aliquam et sit neque quia est voluptatem voluptatem aliquid.

Quae rerum corrupti earum et. Repellendus voluptas sequi non ipsa inventore distinctio praesentium. Non commodi est quisquam ut quaerat facere.

At dicta consectetur et ut esse. Dolores cum assumenda ducimus cum. Itaque eos ut possimus rerum. Sed rerum aspernatur incidunt odit explicabo reiciendis.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”