33 Comments
 

plenty of companies will go under, leading PE funds to have lackluster returns (way behind public markets the past 8 years). Given how leveraged PE is to the roll-up game this probably leads a contraction in size of PE industry in $ terms and probably leads to plenty of firms slowly bleeding to death. Have to remember most of the $5b+ funds mgmt companies are owned by 50-75 year old dudes who could quit tomorrow and be rich as shit. There in turn is no succession plan as the PE firm is dying leading a bunch of 35-50 year old's with nowhere to go. All in all the industry shrinks and is better off for it. PE needs to shrink in $ terms and # of people, its capital is purely a commodity right now (any $10mm+ EBITDA business has 20 bids no matter how shitty) anywhere outside of the small side of the LMM.

 
Most Helpful

I would think they keep on going with roll-ups

  1. It’s cheap
  2. There’s very obvious synergy - three shitty HVAC contractors stitched together with some best practices are more than 3x better than three individual contractors. Same with dentists. Not better for customers or doctors. But there’s economic value.
  3. So you buy cheap, make “value” (it’s dumb value, but it’s not zero), and sell for a little bit more

If anything, the demise of PE actually makes roll-ups more interesting. It’s really the standard issue musical chairs game of shuffling 500M-1B TEV “mission critical” businesses between UMM firms that’s at risk. Those multiples are simply too high in this environment so this will be held for too long. 

 
"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

To me this just sounds like the industrial logic used 10 years ago (or whenever) when these roll ups began. I question the economic value created in these rolls ups, GP ability to sell off the assets (not in a continuation vehicle), and LP reaction to marked down prices/selling at a loss. The synergies, economic value, and whatever the fuck else were great when you were a new entrant in this market but there is purely too much competition and already so many companies who have pulled these levers. There are some still markets where roll ups work (though a dying breed), but I am bearish on them in 2025

 

I think what you are missing is these are highly fragmented localized industries. 

You don’t have less roll-up synergy in East Kansas because other PE firms have colonized the other 49*4+3 direction-states. 

The industrial logic is, forgive the cringe term, timeless 


 by saying “I question” LP reaction to selling at a loss you’re implying there’s a loss. I’d contest that. What’s an example of a roll up where they didn’t at least break even? These are really, really cheap EBITDA and there’s a platform premium. 

 

I would repent and recant my comment about there being no bankruptcy in this category, clad in sackcloth. But I think it’s still a good play with higher odds of survival than an over priced platform deal. If done right you reap benefits of arb. Of course there is execution risk and some industries worse than others for this play

 
acardboardmonkey

I don’t know about a bubble, but the god damn HVAC stuff is a crowded trade.

I shouldn’t know as many people as I do with an HVAC asset, or in the process of looking for one.

 

Quis nostrum aspernatur dolore rerum qui voluptas. Error ea minima alias. Sed repellat eum eligendi earum dolores. Aut amet laborum aperiam officiis saepe qui laudantium. Rerum corporis atque aut fuga. Amet non quo et aliquam quod.

Possimus dolorum quia non est. Sed delectus molestiae placeat quod quia impedit aperiam deleniti. Est dolorem fugit ullam numquam et voluptatem. Laborum nemo eaque voluptatem ea occaecati doloremque quis. Rem repellat nihil accusantium alias.

Error officiis quis veritatis eius sed blanditiis sunt. Reprehenderit iure dolorum at sint eius. Aut sed quas est totam ut maiores totam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”