Sense checks for models (project finance/leverage/gearing)

When modelling, what are some sense checks or interpretations you do for your model to check everything is correct?

for example:

- sources and uses of funding should be equal

- unlevered IRR should be higher than levered IRR

- the interest rate for debt financing is the rate of return required by lenders 

Other than creating 3 statements and checking they all balance, what sense checks do you use while modelling? Thank you

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some essential sense checks and interpretations to ensure your financial model is accurate and reliable:

  1. Balance Sheet Should Always Balance:

    • Ensure that your assets equal liabilities plus equity.
  2. Sources and Uses of Funding Should Be Equal:

    • Verify that the total sources of funds match the total uses of funds.
  3. Unlevered IRR vs. Levered IRR:

    • Confirm that the unlevered IRR is higher than the levered IRR, as leverage typically increases the risk and required return.
  4. Interest Rate for Debt Financing:

    • Ensure the interest rate used for debt financing aligns with the rate of return required by lenders.
  5. Sanity Checks on Key Metrics:

    • Review top-line volumes, revenues, COGS, and Opex to ensure they make sense and there are no double negatives or missing sums.
    • Check that debt levels do not go negative and that IRR values are within a reasonable range (e.g., not 672%).
  6. Consistency in Presentation:

    • Ensure that charts, text boxes, and line spacing are consistent and aligned properly. This helps in avoiding confusion and maintaining professionalism.
  7. Version Control:

    • Maintain strict version control to avoid losing hours of work due to errors or overwrites.
  8. Cross-Verification with External Data:

    • Use external data sources, such as credit card statements or expert calls, to triangulate and verify the accuracy of your model's assumptions and outputs.
  9. Detailed Review of Formulas:

    • Double-check that all formulas are capturing the correct data ranges and that there are no errors in the calculations.
  10. Review of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

    • Focus on the 1-3 most important KPI drivers and ensure they are accurately represented in the model.
  11. Working Capital Movements:

    • Understand and accurately model non-cash accruals, pension obligations, and one-time items.
  12. Debt and Asset Management:

    • Review debt maturities, covenants, debt mix (fixed vs. floating, bank vs. bond), and the assets they are secured against.
  13. Continuous Communication with Management:

    • Build rapport with management and keep them informed to ensure the model reflects the latest business insights and strategies.

By implementing these sense checks, you can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of your financial models.

Sources: Ways of Underperformance - and how to avoid them (Part 1), What lessons you learned the hard way so everyone else doesn't have to?, How to Convince My Boss to Include Excel Modeling Into the Job?, Scared Shitless: How Did You Actually Learn How To Competently Build Financial Models, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/qa-equity-research-analyst-at-top-3-am?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful
  • Totals tie across everything. Not even complicated, but just sum the 5-yr cumulative EBITDA and do a check on that across sheets and that’ll catch 90% of errors (no need to tie more than that)
  • cashflow EBITDA (duh)
  • If ongoing funding needs, cumulative LFCF roughly equal to change in debt + equity injection
  • MoM is calc’d on a gross basis (total gross distributions)/(gross equity injection). Do not use the net distributions that you use for IRR. This is stupid, but let’s say you are doing an infra deal where in year of exit you’re (for some reason) putting some more equity in to fund a project. If you just do the net cash flows it’ll miss stuff
  • if it’s a normal functioning business, NWC should usually increase and be a use of cash. 
  •  
 

patriot18 I did some research on this a while back with 15 interviews trying to understand what IB/PE folks do to check their models.

Here is a link to my original post on Linked-in: Linked-in post

Attaching a snapshot of their techniques below:

1. Start with a robust model design.

a. Create a consistent layout structure across tabs.

b. Color-code numbers based on their source

c. Maintain consistent formulas across rows, this way you need to inspect only one cell per row.

d. Avoid hardcoded numbers inside formulas, create visible assumption cells instead.

2.  Build check lines. Trust but verify.

As you create or update building blocks, build check lines that show if your model is accurate.

a. Framework based (such as BS balancing, interconnections between the 3 statement model).

b. Content driven (whatever it is you are modelling, try to arrive at the same result from 2 different angles).

c. Technical (when creating summary tabs, make sure that total results match per line between tabs).

3. Stress test the model by changing the assumptions.

Test logic by changing assumptions and observing how the outputs behave. This process can identify potentially weak or incorrect logic. Here are a few tricks that we learned:

a. Set all assumptions to zero to identify any anomalies in the model.

b. Gradually change each assumption by a degree and observe how certain outputs behave.

c. Evaluate if the changes make sense. Do they affect the right outputs and by the expected degree or not?

4. Build performance alerts.

a. Connect two model outputs to create meaningful KPIs that highlight unusual results. Example: financial - link revenue and customer acquisition cost to track profitability over time.

b. Set up alerts for significant period-to-period changes in key metrics. Example: financial - flag revenue growth rates above 50%; operations - alert on inventory turnover decreases of 20% or more.

c.  Benchmark against industry norms to highlight performance gaps. Example: financial - compare current ratio to industry averages.

5. Create visual model maps.

Creating a visual representation of your model away from Excel helps you question your own logic, but it also invites your stakeholders to contribute on a deeper level:

a. Draw a flowchart or diagram showing the model's structure and key calculations

b. Use shapes and arrows to illustrate relationships between different parts of the model

c. Include brief explanations of critical formulas or assumptions

6.  Ask a colleague for support. The four-eye principle.

A fresh perspective can identify overlooked aspects. Your colleague could help catch mistakes and challenge you where you might have considered the job done. Provide your colleague with appropriate context and let them get to work independently. Discuss issues, debate solutions, and implement changes.

7. Print and review. Jump away from the screen. 

Printing your model allows you to step back from Excel and see the big picture. Physical copies make it easier to spot patterns or inconsistencies that might be missed on screen. Get a cup of coffee. Zoom out. Assess if numbers make sense together. Look for visual anomalies in numbers.

Hope this helps!

 

Dicta ipsum quisquam qui quod. At inventore a omnis est. Ut sunt ut nulla quasi sequi reiciendis in. Et autem dolores eum autem.

Quia praesentium possimus excepturi. Debitis placeat quia illum autem aspernatur tenetur blanditiis. Molestiae similique accusantium cupiditate. Adipisci dicta ut est.

Culpa quasi id vel labore beatae voluptas. Voluptatem id cupiditate veniam et et ut odio. Sapiente repellendus numquam non quia nesciunt.

Voluptatem et incidunt perspiciatis. Ut provident sit quam aut velit. Dicta vitae explicabo ut repellat consequuntur inventore ab. Molestiae quae non quidem sequi officiis architecto magni.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”