Technical Questions

I got asked these questions during a PE superday and I am still not entirely sure what the answer is. Can anyone provide any guidance as to how to think about answering these questions?

1) If revenue grows by 10% each year, will EBITDA grow more than, as much as or less than 10% each year?

2) If I get cash flows in year 1 at 1 dollar and then every subsequent year (after year 1), my cash flows increases by one additional dollar per year into perpetuity, what would be the value of the cash flows? 

 

1) is a price / volume question. Assuming the only thing that happens is that revenue increases (I.e. no increase to fixed costs), then you have to see whether it was driven by price or volume. If price then the revenue increase drops to the EBITDA line and so you have margin expansion, but you also have less price on the table left to take for the next sponsor. If revenue growth is volume driven then, assuming no change to the variable cost structure, margin stays the same since you’re just selling more stuff at the same margin. Generally growth is a mix of these factors and it’s important to disaggregate.

 
Most Helpful

Since this is about growth rate not margin % the answer is related to fixed/variable cost structure, not price/volume. Even if growth is 100% volume driven, unless fixed costs are growing, your EBITDA will grow >10%. Price-driven growth will increase by more than volume driven, but both will be higher given the operating leverage over the static fixed costs. 

 

2) is interesting. The present value of a perpetual annuity of $x is x/d for discount rate d.

I am sure there is a similarly easy finance answer to the question you were asked, but I was a math major not a finance major so now you have to bear through this:

What you have is a series where the nth term is equal to n/(1+d)^(n-1) for discount rate d.

So 1+2/(1+d)+3/(1+d)^2....+n/d^(n-1)+...

No idea how that’s helpful tbh. You can immediately conclude some things - for example, as d->infinity you need the value of the investment to approach 1.

But at least for me, that’s not enough to see the answer so someone please provide the answer lol.

 

There are a few formulas but I'm not sure if they're relevant here. The value of the last term in a perpetuity growth formula is (value/(growth -discount)), but there is no constant growth factor.

As the series gets larger and larger, the growth rate of the numerator approaches 0 and the denominator gets bigger by the discount rate. Thus, the term approaches 0.For discount rate, I would just use risk free since the way the question is framed, there is no risk to the payout.

You can approximate the answer on excel really quickly. After summing 350 terms, I get $1150 (using 3% as risk free). Curious if anyone has a trick to do this mentally or on paper.

 

This is a perpetuity of perpetuities question. Think of it this way:

Your yearly "inflow" is the value of each $1 perpetuity - i.e. we know that the value of a $1 perpetuity is 1/d. However, we are receiving this value each year, so our yearly inflow is 1/d... meaning that the value of these cashflows should be (1/d)/d... or 1/d^2

Mathematically speaking...

If the value of a $1 perpetuity, represented as:

1/(1+d)^1 + 1/(1+d)^2 + 1/(1+d)^3 + 1/(1+d)^4 .... contracts to 1/d...

And we are looking at:

(1/d)/(1+d)^1 + (1/d)/(1+d)^2 + (1/d)/(1+d)^3 + (1/d)/(1+d)^4...

We can factor out the (1/d) term as it appears in every term, leaving:

(1/d) (1/(1+d)^1 + 1/(1+d)^2 + 1/(1+d)^3 + 1/(1+d)^4))

But we can simplify this further because the second bracket is the formula for the $1 annuity...

(1/d)(1/d)

Which equals

1/d^2

Hope this helps.

 

I have it as (1/d^2) + 1/d

Since you have a perpetuity of (1/d) but with a (1/d) cash flow at t = 0 instead of it starting at t=1, let me explain. 

In the second line of your formula you have 1/d / (1+d)^1 . So you're discounting the value of the first perpetuity back one period. But the perpetuity formula for cash flows starting at t = 1 already gives you the value of the perpetuity at t = 0, so no need to discount that first term. You can keep that first term as just 1/d and the rest of the terms reduce to (1/d^2) as you said. 

I tried it with CFs of $1 and a discount rate of 10% and got $110, proving the second term should be there. Let me know what you think. 

 

can you explain how you got to 1/d + 1/d^2? particularly the 1/d^2 term - not too familiar with how the perpetuity formula is derived 

my intuition was that you'd receive a perpetuity each year for eternity, and as the years go by, the value of said perpetuities will eventually approach 0 just like a regular perpetuity - so there had to be a way to approximate a value for it. mathematically it'd be 10 + 10/(1+D)^1 + 10/(1+D)^2 + 10/(1+D)^3.....my understanding stops there since I don't know how to reduce the mathematical expressions (need to brush up...) 

$110 seems to be the right answer though. using excel and an arbitrary period of 120 years, the sum of the PV of all the perpetuities received is ~$109.9989 

 

Consequatur excepturi voluptatem nam quos. Explicabo voluptas excepturi quasi consequuntur eos totam. Quod magnam laboriosam maiores perferendis a aut facilis. Mollitia id ex natus nostrum quasi accusantium. Aut dolorem quo reprehenderit aut reiciendis. Eveniet velit esse quaerat expedita molestias. Qui esse praesentium dignissimos velit reprehenderit voluptatem. Qui ea ipsam ipsum ad cum molestias eos.

Molestiae aliquam illum ea officiis consequuntur eligendi sunt. Et nisi architecto et dolor omnis commodi eius. Accusantium quasi aspernatur minima rerum autem placeat officia.

Pariatur sed dolores et amet quibusdam deleniti cumque. Voluptas optio dolor rerum in. Voluptates reprehenderit ipsa in velit aperiam a. Et ut deleniti nihil eum.

Quod sint velit cumque quibusdam quae. Ducimus a et qui quia et tempore tempora. Deserunt et et culpa quia perferendis consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”