Why don't strategic acquirers do LBOs
Why can't they make acquisitions with significant leverage like a private equity firm? Surely this would be the wise thing to do considering they are in an industry with low volatility and stable cashflows?
Why can't they make acquisitions with significant leverage like a private equity firm? Surely this would be the wise thing to do considering they are in an industry with low volatility and stable cashflows?
| +47 | Independent Sponsor - Path Ahead? | 15 | 2d |
| +34 | 2026 PE Associate Bonus Thread | 40 | 1d |
| +34 | Legacy vs. Up-and-Coming Funds | 16 | 1d |
| +30 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 11 | 7h |
| +21 | Semi-target into IB (London) -> PE | 20 | 5d |
| +19 | Do you regret doing PE? | 6 | 1d |
| +18 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 0 | 5h |
| +15 | Mid Level Attrition | 9 | 22h |
| +12 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 1 | 9m |
| +11 | those of you who had an easy banking experience - how f’d were you when you went to PE? | 7 | 4d |
Career Resources
Balance sheet for a large corporate works very different than a PE firm especially when it comes to considerations like maintaining a credit rating given how debt for a controling interest works on the balance sheet.
That's not to say it's always all purely funded from the existing cash on the balance sheet, it's just leverage levels are not as high compared to a PE shop.
Plenty of strategics do lever up to make big acquisitions, but it's not an "LBO" even if they take on a ton of debt bc LBO implies there's an exit. Also keep in mind that PE firms lever up in the first place to juice returns, but strategics should generally create value in acquisitions from synergies (otherwise you probably shouldn't be doing the deal).
That's a very interesting question. In my opinion, there are a couple of reasons.
1. Economics: strategics evaluate acquisition success differently, as they target a modest financial return - simply a figure that exceeds their own cost of capital. No need for 20% + IRR. Why place additional leverage then, increase the risk of financial distress for the overall entity and risk your current credit rating?
2. Strategy: corporate acquirers pursue M&A not only for financial reasons. Strategic buyers often view M&A as a fast and effective way of enhancing their present operations by integrating assets and capabilities that they consider to be valuable - such as strong brands, access to new markets and products, or additional sources of growth. In other words, they are seeking to buy a strong strategic fit. It is not necessarily only a financial consideration.
3. Synergies: theoretically, corporate buyers should be extracting synergies and integrating acquisition targets with their core business. Therefore, the target company won't remain in the status quo - it will be restructured / integrated / dismantled. There is lots of execution risk. If you lever this particular project, there might be consequences for the whole corporation if the integration does not go to plan (think of GE that overlevered particular bits of the business, introduced undue complexity and now is cleaning up its operations). This is very different from a vanilla LBO that sits in its own SPV and - typically - does not take the entire PE fund down in case of trouble in this particular business.
4. Listed businesses: public corporate acquirers do not enjoy operating confidentiality - they have to report to the shareholders, the press, analysts on a quarterly basis. Surely, this level of scrutiny encourages them to tread carefully, especially with any decisions that appear aggressive to the outsiders. Putting an LBO-style debt on an M&A target will raise lots of eyebrows, in my view.
Non repellat autem necessitatibus dolor. Quis sapiente fugit corporis saepe pariatur libero. Cum debitis quia odit maxime delectus quidem officia omnis.
Consequuntur vitae modi voluptatem sit. Adipisci est animi nihil rerum libero. Iure ex fuga in incidunt. Sed et harum optio ipsa numquam enim maiores. Necessitatibus atque doloribus fugiat praesentium nobis.
Porro aspernatur in odio non ut. Nihil inventore voluptates fugit soluta consequatur dolor dolorum nisi. Minus quo quo veritatis soluta. Est impedit sequi cupiditate voluptas distinctio blanditiis labore. Quisquam praesentium ab labore quis omnis.
Impedit id atque nisi est quia est. Ut dignissimos quaerat harum eligendi. Numquam possimus consequuntur ipsum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...