Why take on private debt?

Recently learned about the world of private debt. Not in the field but trying to understand a bit more than primers.

I get that private debt can be nice way to get custom debt and companies take on debt when they need to find easily replicable things with clear pay out trajectory that just take money to do. 

But then what are some specific types of use cases of private debt (as opposed to a bank loan or a grant)? Limitations of private debt? Overall impact on the global economy?

21 Comments
 

Private debt serves as a flexible financing tool for companies, often filling gaps that traditional bank loans or grants cannot address. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

Why Companies Take on Private Debt

  1. Custom Financing Solutions: Private debt offers tailored structures that banks may not provide. For example, direct lending deals often cater to companies with unique risk profiles or those requiring non-standard terms.
  2. Faster Access to Capital: In time-sensitive situations, such as refinancing a maturing loan or funding an acquisition, private debt can be a quicker option compared to traditional bank loans.
  3. Riskier Transactions: Banks typically avoid higher-risk lending, such as second-lien loans or mezzanine financing. Private debt investors step in to provide capital for these riskier parts of the capital structure.
  4. Flexibility in Use: Companies can use private debt for various purposes, including:
    • Leveraged buyouts (LBOs)
    • Growth capital
    • Recapitalizations
    • Distressed situations or turnarounds

Limitations of Private Debt

  1. Higher Costs: Private debt often comes with higher interest rates compared to traditional bank loans, reflecting the increased risk and bespoke nature of the financing.
  2. Covenants and Restrictions: Lenders may impose strict covenants to protect their downside, which can limit a company's operational flexibility.
  3. Default Risk: Failure to meet repayment obligations can lead to financial distress or bankruptcy, especially for companies with weaker cash flows.
  4. Limited Availability for Small Companies: Private debt typically requires scale, making it less accessible for smaller businesses compared to bank loans or grants.

Impact on the Global Economy

  1. Filling Financing Gaps: Private debt plays a crucial role in funding mid-market companies and transactions that banks or public markets might overlook.
  2. Increased Competition: The rise of private debt funds has introduced more competition in the lending space, potentially driving innovation in financing structures.
  3. Economic Resilience: By providing capital during downturns or distressed situations, private debt can help stabilize companies and preserve jobs.
  4. Potential Risks: Over-reliance on private debt can increase systemic risk, especially if companies take on excessive leverage or if economic conditions deteriorate.

Private debt is a dynamic and growing asset class, offering both opportunities and challenges for companies and the broader economy. It bridges the gap between traditional bank lending and equity financing, but it requires careful consideration of its costs and risks.

Sources: Overview of Leveraged Finance, January 2016 Data Update 6: Debt, the double edged sword, Automation in fundamental finance roles, Private Debt/Direct Lending Exit Opps?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Debt generally goes from lowest to highest interest rate: Public, IG bonds (think Apple) -> commercial bank loans -> HY public debt -> lev loans -> private credit (senior secured) -> mezz debt -> distressed debt (loan to own).

Ask yourself why companies end up doing private loans versus public/bank. Because those sources of capital are not available given the quality of the companies and/or requested leverage ratios are not under writable for these lenders. This is why many believe private credit is an inevitable bubble where if PE has issues PC by default (pun intended) will have plenty of issues. IMO most PC funds are just buddy/buddy with PE and don't really underwrite deals too hard because they need deal flow and if they're assholes the PE firms will just go to the next PC firm. I think this is especially true in the large side of things where companies are perceived as not very risky, when in reality the DSR is terrible compared to public comps

 

I presume there probably won’t be a distinction in the future because it’s all gonna be tokenized and underwriting just becomes kinda of all AI automated.

When in doubt, use more peanut butter
 

Yeah I deserve all the MS for a technological eventuality. 

Debt issuers don’t care whether it’s called private debt or whatever. They care it’s underwritten in a way that works for them. 

They’re just gonna be looking at the terms of the loans and how much they get to influence the underwriting & parameters around the debt.
 

Only way this converges is towards debt underwriting “platforms” and credit vehicles are just attaching themselves to the platforms and competing to offer best products. Lot of the legal engineering & term structuring could be easily automated with a credit/debt expert who knows how to use the right tools. 

I can’t tell you who those experts are and what skills they’ll have but the odds are best private debt vehicles sort of already operate this way. With the “platform” being existing and well-known PE funds in this case 


 

When in doubt, use more peanut butter
 

Where do you see all this converging to? I’ve already written out my PoV - where the walls btw debt classifications breakdown and we converge to few debt platforms and debt vehicles just attach themselves to the platforms.


If you look at it per debt category right now, it seems like it’s already the case without tokenization and PE funds are just the platforms.


But curious to hear what you think will happen as next steps. Like do you see the talent pool for debt product underwriters start to converge and get standardized, discover process for debt underwriters changing, etc…

When in doubt, use more peanut butter
 

I don't see how PC returns wont get competed out given the number of players and amount of capital to put to work. Could be way off but from an outside perspective that's where I see the industry going

 
Most Helpful

The simplest answer is banks are heavily regulated which leads to higher underwriting standards, tighter covenants, and less flexibility. Private credit firms are significantly less regulated so they have much lower underwriting standards and PE-friendly covenants. 

So for an LBO, while you're paying higher interest for non-bank debt, you're generally able to get higher leverage, less covenants, and an overall more partnership-oriented lender than if you used a bank. 

 

So it’s all a about the economics of things and how they’re structured. Tells me that maybe private credit is kinda of a catch-all term.

And for companies taking out private debt, they probably need to come with a very strong understanding of what they’re doing how it generates returns and whether their assumptions are reasonable or not…


How high or high low do the loans go do you think? (Like the lowest amount you’ve seen to highest amount you’ve seen)

I’m sure there are some people who don’t run proper due diligence as well lol

When in doubt, use more peanut butter
 

Nam tempore molestiae nam ut impedit. Fugit odit dolor voluptas illum quasi minima eaque. Corrupti expedita dolorem beatae dicta. Voluptatum et rem rerum occaecati a. Quis est omnis odio aut quod totam dolorem.

Molestias id veniam eum at iste ut. Sint et rerum corporis est nesciunt inventore. Aut quia quidem beatae et amet odit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”