Why take on private debt?
Recently learned about the world of private debt. Not in the field but trying to understand a bit more than primers.
I get that private debt can be nice way to get custom debt and companies take on debt when they need to find easily replicable things with clear pay out trajectory that just take money to do.
But then what are some specific types of use cases of private debt (as opposed to a bank loan or a grant)? Limitations of private debt? Overall impact on the global economy?
Private debt serves as a flexible financing tool for companies, often filling gaps that traditional bank loans or grants cannot address. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:
Why Companies Take on Private Debt
Limitations of Private Debt
Impact on the Global Economy
Private debt is a dynamic and growing asset class, offering both opportunities and challenges for companies and the broader economy. It bridges the gap between traditional bank lending and equity financing, but it requires careful consideration of its costs and risks.
Sources: Overview of Leveraged Finance, January 2016 Data Update 6: Debt, the double edged sword, Automation in fundamental finance roles, Private Debt/Direct Lending Exit Opps?
Debt generally goes from lowest to highest interest rate: Public, IG bonds (think Apple) -> commercial bank loans -> HY public debt -> lev loans -> private credit (senior secured) -> mezz debt -> distressed debt (loan to own).
Ask yourself why companies end up doing private loans versus public/bank. Because those sources of capital are not available given the quality of the companies and/or requested leverage ratios are not under writable for these lenders. This is why many believe private credit is an inevitable bubble where if PE has issues PC by default (pun intended) will have plenty of issues. IMO most PC funds are just buddy/buddy with PE and don't really underwrite deals too hard because they need deal flow and if they're assholes the PE firms will just go to the next PC firm. I think this is especially true in the large side of things where companies are perceived as not very risky, when in reality the DSR is terrible compared to public comps.
I presume there probably won’t be a distinction in the future because it’s all gonna be tokenized and underwriting just becomes kinda of all AI automated.
lol
Yeah I deserve all the MS for a technological eventuality.
Debt issuers don’t care whether it’s called private debt or whatever. They care it’s underwritten in a way that works for them.
They’re just gonna be looking at the terms of the loans and how much they get to influence the underwriting & parameters around the debt.
Only way this converges is towards debt underwriting “platforms” and credit vehicles are just attaching themselves to the platforms and competing to offer best products. Lot of the legal engineering & term structuring could be easily automated with a credit/debt expert who knows how to use the right tools.
I can’t tell you who those experts are and what skills they’ll have but the odds are best private debt vehicles sort of already operate this way. With the “platform” being existing and well-known PE funds in this case
Where do you see all this converging to? I’ve already written out my PoV - where the walls btw debt classifications breakdown and we converge to few debt platforms and debt vehicles just attach themselves to the platforms.
If you look at it per debt category right now, it seems like it’s already the case without tokenization and PE funds are just the platforms.
But curious to hear what you think will happen as next steps. Like do you see the talent pool for debt product underwriters start to converge and get standardized, discover process for debt underwriters changing, etc…
I don't see how PC returns wont get competed out given the number of players and amount of capital to put to work. Could be way off but from an outside perspective that's where I see the industry going
The simplest answer is banks are heavily regulated which leads to higher underwriting standards, tighter covenants, and less flexibility. Private credit firms are significantly less regulated so they have much lower underwriting standards and PE-friendly covenants.
So for an LBO, while you're paying higher interest for non-bank debt, you're generally able to get higher leverage, less covenants, and an overall more partnership-oriented lender than if you used a bank.
So it’s all a about the economics of things and how they’re structured. Tells me that maybe private credit is kinda of a catch-all term.
And for companies taking out private debt, they probably need to come with a very strong understanding of what they’re doing how it generates returns and whether their assumptions are reasonable or not…
How high or high low do the loans go do you think? (Like the lowest amount you’ve seen to highest amount you’ve seen)
I’m sure there are some people who don’t run proper due diligence as well lol
Everything in life is about the economics of things and how they're structured young blood
LBOs can’t just go get a bank loan at 3%, the risk is way too high. You need to party with the demons (golub, etc)
For LBOs, think there's a middle ground between 3% paper and golub... also think that middle ground includes the bank-lead leveraged loan market...
Nam tempore molestiae nam ut impedit. Fugit odit dolor voluptas illum quasi minima eaque. Corrupti expedita dolorem beatae dicta. Voluptatum et rem rerum occaecati a. Quis est omnis odio aut quod totam dolorem.
Molestias id veniam eum at iste ut. Sint et rerum corporis est nesciunt inventore. Aut quia quidem beatae et amet odit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...