18 Comments
 
"King0fCapital"

Opening up a discussion to offer my insight to prospective students and people wanting to get into private equity is considered being a "tool." My apologies..

I'm not trying to put you down for your accomplishments, you should obviously be proud. Just giving you the hint that you should be more humble in the way you frame your posts. The deal's not even closed yet and you're touting about how you're "closing" it as if you did everything. You're an analyst.

 

These are fantastic questions.

1.) The deal was sourced through an investment banker that I have a good connection with. A large portion of my job is calling brokers to source and analyze as much prospective deals as possible. The deal was brand new to the market and I found relative interest in it based on our funds' criteria and the amount of projected EBITDA increase I saw for the following years based on a lot of growth opportunities

2.) The multiple I tagged it with initially was put in the range of 6-7x. After being provided with more financials from my preliminary valuation and IOI I set the multiple at 7x, which the broker and the rest of our firm found to be a win win. The EBITDA interest coverage ration came in around 1.94 - which is good for the industry of the company.

 
"King0fCapital"

I have interned with the firm for 2 years prior to accepting a full time offer and have had a great deal of responsibilities since. This is by no means the first deal I have worked on. My job consists of bringing in the deals that MY TEAM and I further analyze, so I don't seem to understand the confusion behind your comment.

Thanks for taking the time to do a Q&A. I'm sure there is alot that prospective's can learn from your experience as a student working at a private equity fund that is not considered "bulge bracket" (your words). Although I understand the "fake it to you make it" and "punch above the belt" mentality, there needs to be a hint of realism or at least a sense of self-worth.

It's great that you want to help others and that's something we should all seek to emulate, but you're selflessness is masked with a central, narcissistic component... the need to feel important.

You have a team. You determined the preliminary valuation. This is not your first deal. I get it, I really do, we've all had that desire to feel important, but we weren't. The comments you see aren't people against you, just people with experience that have been where you are and know this business. They know that ego and arrogance can ruin a career and want to provide unsolicited feedback in the hopes that maybe you will listen. You can view this as criticism, it's not. It's constructive feedback, take it for what it is.

Best of luck and don't take the comments too seriously.

Play the long game - give back, help out, mentor - just don't ever forget where you came from. #Bootstrapped
 

I agree with the above poster in that you seem like a tool. You're making it seem as if you did everything yourself, from sourcing the deal to diligencing it. All as a first year analyst. If that's the case, congrats. I have a very, very hard time believing that, though.

So the deal is "potentially the most profitable deal in the firm's history?" You sound like an idiot when you make claims like this. A partner at my firm said something to the same effect when he closed on a deal for a company that ended up in Ch. 11. Your deal may be larger, but I doubt the risk/return characteristics are so different from the characteristics of other deals your firm has done that it justifies making such a dumb claim. Maybe you managed to find the only risk-free 5.0xer that your IB friend decided to toss you instead of broadly marketing it to increase his fee, but I doubt it.

Still a great accomplishment. I assume you will not be involved in the monitoring of the operations of the company post-close? As an analyst, I don't know how you'd have time to source, diligence, and monitor existing portfolio companies/new deals. But what do I know? Maybe you're just a super-analyst that eats, sleeps, and breathes private equity.

 
Best Response

There are so many ridiculous things in OP's nonsense post. I can't do the whole thing justice but hope to bring up a few points. Others, please follow.

  1. You (an analyst) are NOT overseeing, nor will ever oversee, an entire LBO process, let alone ANY process (maybe updating a financial model, albeit with some oversight). Even a senior associate does not oversee an entire LBO process. If so, why even have MD's/Partners? Have you ever managed M&A bankers, financing parties, negotiated covenants, managed transaction lawyers, financing lawyers, consultants, tax, accounting and insurance experts, regulatory matters, negotiated SPAs, structured management equity programs, appease your LP's, get board approval, etc.? Do you have any clue how difficult that is? THAT is the entire "LBO" process. That shit falls on the MD/partner and even for them it is a collaborative process. So the answer is NO. No serious firm will leave that serious shit to some analyst, no matter how good you are - and from the way you communicate, you don't even remotely resemble how a high performing analyst/associate comes across. What you are most likely referring to is the firm encourages proactive "sourcing" by the junior staff to screen / identify potentially interesting targets. Maybe they gave you a nice pat on the pack and asked you to do a "further look" into it to keep you busy, ie. create a model, do some research, make a returns model, etc., while they tend to more important matters. Do you have any clue how those seniors think? Let's say that they also believe (they don't) that this deal of yours will be the 'most successful deal in history' - although people rarely make statements like that as any semi-rational person will downplay expectations - you think they'll leave it up to an analyst to do manage the entire process? (that they know you can't do)? Nevertheless, this probably got to your hubris leading you to make a ridiculous no value-add post. Analysts and junior associates do not negotiate with any of the important decision makers, sorry.

  2. "creating a lbo model with a debt schedule that will maximize projected cash flow for the highest return on investment possible".

- HAHAHA I'm sorry but what the fuck does this mean???..."debt schedule", "maximize projected CF", "highest ROI possible"? What the fuck does a debt schedule directly have to do with "the highest return on investment possible"? You're just throwing some nonsense combination of finance jargon you memorized on a WSO hoping that some of it sticks and makes sense. But in fact you come across - as others have pointed out - as a complete tool and out of depth. MANY things drive return. Some shit debt payment waterfall you got working after the 10th iteration (congratulations, btw) is NOT the basis of what drives returns. What about the cash flow that will service that debt? What drives that, topline growth/margin expansion, inventory management, financing arrangements, etc? How do you think about recap/dividends? A 7x EBITDA deal is NOT a high growth company. The bankers give you the CIM and literally make up numbers to make it appear enticing. You went up to 7x from 6x after they provided you more information...you are getting played. You say "maximize projected cash flow" through your "debt schedule"? Sorry it's late on a Sunday and I'm having a little trouble digesting the hilarity of your sentence. You want to maximize projected CF with a debt schedule? Your "debt schedule" which includes take into account interest, amortization, possibly prepayments - actually minimize cash flow. (Unless your going leverage-lite, but based on your 1.9x interest coverage it does not seem like it"). Have you even given a thought to the exit horizon? How will the refi market look in 5-7 year exit horizon? Your elementary knowledge is embarrassing.

I don't mean to be so harsh but posts like this do more damage than good when good natured people looking for real advice actually take what's said as good advice. Maybe originally well intentioned (or possibly a bored troll post), but this is a joke. Next.

 

Odit distinctio optio deleniti voluptatem aut et sed. A dignissimos voluptatem voluptas facilis sunt et ut. Impedit tempore aut maiores sed beatae. Voluptatibus et perspiciatis earum cum voluptatibus. Quo qui esse quisquam eligendi aut reprehenderit nobis. Nihil harum aut ut et nisi non.

Est et harum et qui at. Voluptas id iusto voluptatibus sed. Illo numquam ut in voluptatum voluptates fugit voluptatem rerum.

Ut ullam quos sint natus quos. Accusantium rerum tenetur corrupti sint dolores inventore voluptas. Nihil sunt praesentium possimus officia voluptatem rem. Eveniet sunt itaque nulla minus dolorum perspiciatis excepturi. Suscipit unde repellat reprehenderit tempore sed.

Global buyer of highly distressed industrial companies. Pays Finder Fees Criteria = $50 - $500M revenues. Highly distressed industrial. Limited Reps and Warranties. Can close in 1-2 weeks.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”