Would you do a dividend recap or pay down debt with excess FCF?
My guess is debt paydown to reduce interest cost. However, wouldn't paying a dividend boost your IRR a lot more? Thoughts?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +75 | What’s “the path” now? | 29 | 30m |
| +53 | Don’t go into finance unless you really like markets / deals / investing | 11 | 23h |
| +39 | RO / Rerecruit / Bet on Myself | 8 | 4d |
| +34 | 3rd Year IB Analyst, Top Bucket, Still No PE Offer. What Would You Do? | 14 | 18h |
| +32 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 6 | 2h |
| +28 | Army Officer Seeking Advise on transition to PE | 9 | 1d |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 1 | 20h |
| +20 | On Cycle Preparation | 6 | 1d |
| +19 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 9 | 12s |
| +18 | GE / LMM PE Comp in Tier 2 City | 1 | 5d |
Career Resources
It all depends on your goal. If you're trying to maximize IRR, you are correct in theory; you will always try to maximize your cash distributions ASAP whenever cost of debt financing is cheaper than your equity return and your debt covenants allow you to do so. If you're speaking in terms of a typical LBO test, many LBO tests simplify to assume cash used for 100% debt paydown to keep it clean and simple.
In reality, many debt securities prohibit or restrict some / all forms of cash distribution to equityholders before they are paid out (i.e., you would want to dividend out cash, but there are minimum cash sweeps for 1st Lien, maybe restrictions on cash leakage on 2nd Lien / Mezz, etc.). Also there are obviously ongoing needs for capex, NWC and other regular business matters, so most people don't 'wind' the cash flow so tightly in a model and leave some small amount of cash building on the B/S. Obviously highly dependent on the business and financial profile, but generally the IRR doesn't change that materially in a 5+ year horizon (usually less than 5% assuming debt paydown vs. equity dividend), and the MOIC should not change materially either (i.e., cash used to pay down debt vs. dividend out is roughly the same amount of cash quantum still received by the same equityholder, its just change in timing)
Very good answer here. Would add that at times, recaps / infusions may be done for reasons none of the above (so neither returns- nor covenant-driven). Could be check-size driven: re: if considered too "small" from the upfront investment POV, can get through IC w/ the promise of NTM follow-up equity investment opps (ex. energy DevCo). Similarly, putting down a lot of equity in a platform with the intent of carving out a non-core segment or liquidating some assets instantly
Sunt recusandae eos et cumque magni impedit unde. Quo aperiam fugiat corporis corrupti fugiat eos. Eius delectus numquam vel voluptatum. Repudiandae fugit fugiat aut quas temporibus nihil quasi. Rerum dolore non voluptas optio iure velit. Aut sint et eius aut. Nulla quos magnam nisi.
Quos voluptas totam eaque cum necessitatibus. Voluptas voluptate accusantium non qui recusandae ut ipsum. Dolorem explicabo dolorem sint nihil. Et ea et quia.
Ut sed recusandae eum doloribus sed ipsam id. Saepe aut rerum debitis. Est neque quo omnis hic. Sit ab aut necessitatibus incidunt dolorem voluptate sint. A et suscipit ipsum nemo dolores illo voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...