Are there any sell-side brokers in the $1-5 M ticket range?
Curious to know if there's any non institutional sell-side brokers on this forum.
I'm coming from a resimmercial background but focus solely on commercial brokerage now with a very "boutique" local shop (think "I've never heard of you guys" when you make a call to a guy at CBRE) haha
I know what I do isn't really respected on this forum but my broker and me make a great team and our clients are mom & pop types who are for the most part, nice people to work with. We close deals in the 1-5 million range on the sell side with the occasional $300k commercial condo. It's a lot of fun and we usually keep the whole nut to ourselves.
What's your experience like? Do you enjoy what you do?
Honestly think middle market / lower middle market brokers have way more fun than most institutional level guys.
I'm not a broker but I work for one of the top teams in the $1M-$20M range. We'll occasionally work on institutional deals that are $50M-$100M+ but I'd say 80% of our deals are with mom and pops. The head brokers on the team rake in at least a few million a year net of split which I was surprised at when I first joined.
I always thought I wanted to work with larger institutional deals in the past since I jumped over from Corp finance, but I realized over the past year that the middle market brokers have a much more fun culture and environment compared to other teams that only focus on large institutional or portfolio deals.
Not to drag this on but I've been in real estate for several years(haven't updated my title on WSO) and I realized I would rather work with brokers that are a lot more relaxed and fun in an office and team atmosphere. I've sourced a few deals here and there and have realized that I would rather deal with smaller mom and pops vs institutions for several reasons.
I'm definitely biased but after being in the industry for several years, you really stop caring about prestige. Not to call WSO out on this but people seem to be way too obsessed with prestige on this site. There are so many roles and positions out there that offer better pay, hours and culture but you just have to find what works best for you. Anyway, this is what I've seen from my industry change over to cre in the past few years.
What product type is your group?
Running your own small/mid sized brokerage it's possible to get into the $2-5M. $1M is possible after a lot of traction and consistent deal volume as a non-owner broker. I think getting above that requires having other team members to earn revenue off their commissions.
I'm almost certain Vice Chairman's at CBRE hit $1M net for some amount of time and get that title. That should
I'm sure there are a few brokers out there in the world putting up HUGE numbers, but they are far and few between.
There's actually more than you think in top markets that are netting 1-2+ million in fees. I know for a fact that one of my producers will net around 4-5 this year, 4 other others will make over a million, and our 2 youngest should clear a little over 500k. As an analyst this will be a good year for the bonus pool. This has been a stellar year but the top producer on my team pretty much always clears a couple million.
To hit vice chairman at CBRE in NYC, you need gross commission income, billed to you, of more than $3 million per year on average, over a certain number of years.
I'm not prestige driven, and I didn't even finish my degree. I'm okay with that, because our clients don't ask about our pedigree. They do business with us because they like us, and they trust us. And that's the core of most relationships in this business.
Thanks for the insight btw, it's great reading more in-depth responses like this.
Forsure. Had a bit of time this morning and was just typing this out on my phone on the way to the office but same for us. Our client could care less about our pedigree unless they are extremely stuck up which we know is going to be a headache to deal with. I definitely agree that people do business with our team and brokers because they like us and they know we have a large amount of market share in our city. Crazy to see how sell-side brokers are killing it in the past few years. Out of my team of 15-20 brokers, everyone is making over 6 figures and more than half of the brokers are raking in at least half a million net fees and splits. I'm around senior associate / vp level for the investments/underwriting side but have seriously considered becoming a broker myself.
I used to be the sole analyst for an institutional group and can confirm it's completely overrated. That team closed a $250M deal this year and their fee was a flat $500k - this was for a new construction, pre-stab sale that took a year + of prospecting during lease-up, a rediculous 100+ page BOV just to compete for the listing, and an exhausting marketing campaign during the peak of COVID.
On the contrary, the middle-market team in the office closed a 20ish unit deal for $5M and charged a 4% gross commission. 1/2 the fee of the $250M deal for 5 - 10% of the work.
High volume middle market is the place to be.
That's what I've seen as well! I would love to work for an institutional group for maybe a year or so just to see how the head brokers operate but this is 100% spot on. The institutional teams in my office generate roughly half of what the high volume middle market groups do. I'm in no way trying to bash on institutional teams at all but am just showing my viewpoint from the past few years in CRE.
Wow, that's amazing insight. I always wondered how much teams made on those 9-figure deals.
I started at a big institutional IS team, and although I've never worked at a small cap brokerage I have dealt with them as a buyer, and am considering working at one at some point in my career. My general thoughts are:
Pros: If you don't care about prestige, you can make a ton of money doing a lot of volume in this space. There's an underserved market for small-cap investment properties that are too small for major brokers and too complicated for realtors, so although you have to work harder to find sellers there's a lot of business to be won out there and you can add a lot of value to the process. Culture seems generally more relaxed too (brokers will wear sneakers to tours, WFH between tours).
Cons: The process is way less structured dealing with mom & pop buyers/sellers. Many of them will simply list a property to "test" the market and let it sit forever waiting for some aspirational price and then pull it if they aren't happy, whereas institutional deals almost always get sold once listed and have a set timeline with a call for offers date. I imagine this can get frustrating, since at the institutional level like 90%+ of listings lead to a closing within 3-6 months, but in the small cap space its maybe like 20-30%. I'd also imagine the training is much better at big shops since there's more emphasis on underwriting and they can afford to pay analyst salaries, whereas a lot of smaller shops probably have their young guys dialing for dollars and getting scraps of the commissions. I think it'd be better to join as an experienced hire once you've been trained elsewhere.
I'm fortunate to have the arrangement that I do with my broker. I don't dial for dollars per se but I have in the past and it was a fortifying experience. Now we are focusing mainly on the usual marketing methods such as mailers & email blasts + social media outlets. I am however craving the contact sport of knocking doors and making those calls. It's a painful experience for 95% of the time but that 5% when a seller agrees to meet is like main lining a fat cup of coffee straight to my brain.
Thanks for your insight, Ricky.
This was a great read and really highlighted the pros and cons of institutional vs mom and pops. It's pretty crazy but the team I'm with is selling around 80-90% of our middle market $1M-$40M deals usually within the first month or two of listing. I believe some of the lead brokers put a good amount of off-market transactions together but we almost never see a deal go through. I'm from a major gateway city so maybe that might be why demand has been so high with low cap deals in the multi family space. I also see smaller funds and large private family offices picking up more multi family assets vs retail/office. Can I ask if you worked in a high COL area or a tier 1 market?
I've done IS and acquisitions across several markets, but the area I buy my own stuff and deal with small cap brokers/owners is a T2/lower COL city (not NY/SF/LA) where theres a ton of inventory in the <$5mm range.
Tempora voluptatem debitis velit aut ut est ducimus. Maxime qui quibusdam accusamus est dolores accusantium dolores.
Vero est ut ut id debitis iusto. Est veritatis ut natus dolore maiores qui. Consectetur non perferendis nihil iste adipisci nesciunt.
Dolorem magni qui eum. Laborum suscipit ut aut excepturi enim pariatur. Impedit architecto laboriosam praesentium dolor unde. Placeat minus rem commodi eos possimus corporis error ad. Eaque sunt tempore et maxime ullam quod. Doloribus beatae quia eum optio sit cum et.
Harum provident temporibus sit molestias eligendi quidem delectus. Culpa quaerat qui tenetur sint officia harum et. Eos ea dolor consequatur dolore explicabo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...