Capital Stack

Hi Guys,

I am looking to learn more about the Equity & Debt capital stack of a real estate deal. I want to learn it conceptually and then apply that to modeling to further enhance my skills for the future. Of course I know debt and equity but I want to know how the capital stack works in more complex deals as well as anything you suggest I can learn about JV agreements, promotes & etc. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to learn more. Thanks for the help.

 

I would suggest reading Linneman's textbook. Despite being a textbook, its pretty easy to read and explains it much better than anyone else I've read/ seen on YouTube. Another option is to take an extension course at a university (I go to UCLA Extension). If you happen to live near Brentwood, one course, MGMT X 477.12 (taught by Adnan Tapia) stands out in particular. Adan teaches his course every other quarter (so not available this summer). He's a great, extremely knowledgable guy.

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 
Most Helpful

It would be helpful if you could be more specific about what components you are interested in. Assuming you understand debt and equity as the only two sources of capital (your own cash versus borrowed money), here are some other private equity basics applicable to real estate deals for you to research further:

  1. Joint venture - a partnership to complete a real estate project, typically between an operator (known as "General Partner") and a capital partner (known as the "Limited Partner"), remember this by you are both jointly taking on a venture
  2. Joint venture agreement - this is a negotiated partner agreement between the partners that includes all of the following and more:

    • Proportions of equity contributions between partners (how much cash each partner will contribute and the corresponding percentage) and when they will contribute (ex. GP will contribute 10% of regular equity, LP will contribute 90% of regular equity)
    • Proportions of additional equity (if needed) required between partners if more cash is needed and what the penalty is if a partner can't contribute (ex. 20% penalty on additional capital contributions not matched by partner)
    • Preferred equity contributions, how they are treated, who will contribute and terms including the pricing (what % on that money), what preferred return it will receive and when it will be paid in the capital stack on exit (typically first, after debt but before regular equity contributions)
    • At exit of investment: waterfall (will define below) and corresponding promotes (will define below) for each partner
  3. General Partner - the "managing" partner within a joint venture, this is the operator - the party with the know how including but not limited to acquiring the land, securing the debt, managing the entitlement or approval process, coordinating the design and construction process (if it is a renovation or development deal), lease up and stabilization phase, etc. Essentially they will be the partner running this deal and making all of the major decisions (assuming they follow the joint venture agreement and are not in violation of any of the provisions that allow the Limited Partner to remove them as manager).

  4. Limited Partner - the "limited" partner as they cannot make any major decisions within the deal (assuming GP does not violate any covenants), this is typically the capital partner whose job it is to look over the General Partner's shoulder to make sure they are acting on the business plan. Although it may sound like the GP has most of the power, the dynamic typically is that they have to answer and cater to the LP's whims and ways of doing business since the LP puts in nearly all of the capital required (usually 85%+ of the total equity).

  5. Preferred equity - jargon can make this seem complex but ultimately JV agreements and equity contributions (what is being contributed in the form of cash for ownership) are basically agreeing who will put up how much cash, how it will be treated and what ownership (equity) each partner gets for that cash. Preferred equity is cash that is either paid out first when you exit an investment (through refinance, sale of property, "marking" the asset to market or partner interest buyout) and/or that accrues interest that is different to the other "classes" of equity within a deal. (ex. LP will contribute 60% of the total equity required in the form of Preferred Equity which in an exit situation will be paid after all forms of debt but before regular equity).

  6. Waterfall - in an exit (see scenarios above), this is simply the order in which cash (proceeds) will be returned to partners. Depending on how great the return is on this investment, certain "levels" of the waterfall will be reached and no money will be paid out. Many deals have IRR "hurdles" with corresponding promotes (defined below). An example would be if on a project level this deal returns a 35%+ IRR then the General Partner receives 25% of all returns in excess of this threshold (Limited Partner receives 75%). Debt always gets paid first, preferred equity is usually next (if applicable) and regular equity is split depending upon how it is specified depending on agreed upon return thresholds.

  7. Promoted interest ("Promote") - in an exit of the investment, this is the amount "extra" you will be paid over the proportion you contributed. For example, if the GP contributes 10% of the regular equity and the agreed to waterfall agrees to pay the GP 20% of the proceeds (cash) coming back then the GP has a 10% "promote". This is usually structured in a tiered system with return thresholds.

That should do it in terms of the basics, please share any other terms or concepts that are still vague or need further explanation.

 

"Although it may sound like the GP has most of the power, the dynamic typically is that they have to answer and cater to the GP's whims and ways of doing business since the GP puts in nearly all of the capital required (usually 85%+ of the total equity)."do you mean "cater to the LP's whims and ways... since the LP puts in nearly all of the capital"?

 

Great summary!

I would just add that preferred equity can go in two ways.

1) Common equity, except that there is a preferred element, say 8% until the promote sets in. At which point the promote kicks in. In this structure the preferred equity has unlimited upside.

2) Purely preferred equity. So for example you would have 60% debt and then 10%-25% of preferred equity which would get paid a high return of say 12%. The downside is that you are limited to the 12%. On the other hand it is much safer as it sits lower down of the capital stack.

It is very similar to mezzanine debt.

 

Question on capital stack since where I work in not very clear/does not explain background on deals. We have a deal $20mm total capitalization for a ground up project including debt and equity. We have not gone out to get debt but assume 65% LTC, so $13mm debt and $7mm equity. On this deal we are partnering (JV) with someone who knows the asset class well and has debt connections. To me he is a co-GP in the deal with say based on that. Out of the $7mm we are providing 10% as we are bringing the land, construction expertise, management. He is providing the other 90%, to me this seems he is more of an LP but based on his relationships getting us an operator and he is active in real estate buying/selling his own similar sized deals could he be a co-GP here and as co-GP could he still provide 90% of the equity? It seems every deal is different so not sure and there is not set agreement to see the structure. To clarify he is not very involved in the approval process of the project with the local town and gets input into arch drawings, environmental plans, some updates from our principals so I’m guessing he is really an LP in the deal. 
 

Also as a side note on a different project. In the capital stack on the equity side (common and pret equity) you have pref equity which to me you get a high expected return of a fixed % and is really more of a continuation of a mezz loan on the equity side (please correct me if wrong because I’m not 100% sure this is one example I’ve seen of a 14% pref equity investment treated as a loan). Common and pref equity would make up the total of the 35% requirement if you have 65% LTV or LTC. Sponsor aka common equity is usually 10-15% of the 35% and this sponsor equity can also be split by bringing in a co-GP who would share in the promote usually only on very large deals. The rest of the 85-90% (of the total 35% equity) would be the pref equity portion that is comprised on LPs who are apart of waterfall but GP get outsized returns depending on what IRR they hit. They have less rights (I’m thinking of as class B investors for example) and mainly just contribute capital if they don’t have expertise/understanding (think HNW individual). 
 

Let me know if this understanding is correct because where I’m at is all over the place. 

 

Culpa est ab dolorum odio distinctio. Error et vitae atque aut rerum. Temporibus minima sit dolor aut consequatur. Excepturi debitis sed labore ex. Aut dolore tempora earum rem.

A atque rem voluptatem ut. Ut molestias optio deserunt debitis veritatis. Ipsum quasi et molestiae explicabo et explicabo.

Provident nam eius nemo in et. Quibusdam quisquam incidunt officia veniam molestiae consequatur. Eos est sed ipsa dolores optio ut.

Quam aspernatur ea consequuntur quam ut ea mollitia harum. Ullam incidunt voluptates sequi magni sint rerum consequuntur. Veniam ut ullam cupiditate ut exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”