Deciding between opportunities
Curious your thoughts, didn’t get offers from these places…But in interview process, so want to see what people would lean towards, career-progression wise / greatest potential for a lucrative career. Just to make clear: i’m at analyst level (22 yr old) and approaching one year mark at a bank in CRE lending. TBH I don’t know 100% what I want to pursue. But I find all these roles below very interesting.
Option 1: Acquisitions analyst - private equity firm, large size, 5 bil AUM, development deals & existing asset acquisitions. Working with a tight knit team of 5-6 despite large firm.
Option 2: CRE analyst at big bank - like JPmorgan - corporate banking - working on risk management, portfolio management, covenants, assist corporate banking, originations.
Option 3: Capital markets analyst at debt and equity shop: working directly with 4-5 MDs, I’d be the 6th person as analyst (only junior person), acting as engine in underwriting all asset types, modeling, making OMs, meetings with PE firms and lenders / private lenders / debt funds. Travel too. Advisory work, acting as middle man between the investor and the capital. generating a fee once closing.
o
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of your options and their potential for career progression and lucrative opportunities:
Option 1: Acquisitions Analyst - Private Equity Firm
Option 2: CRE Analyst at Big Bank (e.g., JPMorgan)
Option 3: Capital Markets Analyst at Debt and Equity Shop
Recommendation:
If you're unsure about your long-term goals but want to maximize career progression and optionality:
- Option 1 (Acquisitions Analyst) is the best choice if you're leaning toward a principal-side career in private equity or development. It offers the most direct path to lucrative roles in real estate investing.
- Option 3 (Capital Markets Analyst) is ideal if you value a mix of entrepreneurial work, client interaction, and deal-making. It provides a strong foundation for transitioning to acquisitions or other principal-side roles later.
- Option 2 (CRE Analyst at Big Bank) is a safer, more stable option with strong brand recognition, but it may not offer the same level of deal exposure or entrepreneurial experience as the other two.
Ultimately, your decision should align with your interests and long-term goals. If you're still exploring, Options 1 and 3 provide more dynamic experiences that can help you figure out what you enjoy most.
Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/qa-real-estate-analystassociate?customgpt=1, What are the Roles within Real Estate Private Equity?, Most Profitable Career Path in CRE, Career Path Starting as Credit Analyst, Torn between two job opportunities
You can have a lucrative career at any of them. The “right” answer here depends too much on your interests and personality.
For instance, to me, 1 sounds like a great job and is would probably what I personally would pick, 2 sounds terrible to me and I would only do it if the name was big enough and it was my goal to get a prestige MBA and then try for some megafund, and 3 sounds like a great job too but would never work for my personality.
But that’s just me, not some sort of empirical ranking or objective advice.
Yea I probably like option 2 the least out of the rest but it’s because of the name and I know exits would be good.
Probably should’ve mentioned option 3 has opportunity to become client facing and building relationships down the road which I know can be very fulfilling. Thanks for your comment!
No brainer that Option 1 is the best if you want to build a career on the principal side. Most people aren’t able to break into repe/development until they have a couple of years of adjacent experience (capital markets, investment sales, etc.) so you can essentially skip that step and accumulate experience early. If you want to be a debt/equity broker long term then obviously option 3 is best. Can’t go wrong with either, good work on getting these offers in today’s labor market.
Thank you for your comment. Definitely leaning towards 1 and 3. But just don’t want to miss 2 either incase I don’t get 1 and 3, as I know 2 will offer solid exits.
1
Currently am at option 2 and am bored and in process of leaving. Would not advise unless you want to park and stay there for 20 years. Since options 1&3 sound awesome, you are too ambitious for that.
Thank you for the comment. I can definitely see 2 becoming very repetitive. May I ask what you are leaving to?
I was frustrated how bureaucratic the environment was and how regulatory risk was greater of a concern than credit risk (I understand stuff went crazy in the GFC). Also, the loans are pretty vanilla so once you’ve done 15 you’ve done 100. Fortunately have been able to get my pick of offers from MF lending to smaller equity shops and in between.
Will say the name is seemingly great on a resume and I’ve enjoyed most of the people.
Hours also range from 20 to 80 of work with an average of 50 so pay + benefits is pretty good on hourly basis. I’ve been there for 3.5-4 years so feel like it’s time.
Can I PM a few questions?
Sure!
Obviously should take 1, but to add a bit of color - have worked with a few people who spent time doing 3 (at pretty good places, think PJT PH type) and you’d be surprised at how little/shallow the “underwriting” exposure they got was
PJT is a fundraiser not a D/E shop. Very different things.
capital markets underwriting is inherently shallow. I had to put in a lot of work to move from brokerage analyst to principal side.
If you want to work in CRE, then #1.
IMO #1 or #3. #1 sounds the most desirable in terms of learning opportunities and putting you on the track most people desire (doing deals on principal side). I've worked on both sides and you really get deeper experience as an owner vs advisor. #3 could potentially be more fun and lucrative, I started in a similar role and loved it, have some former colleagues that stuck with it making big $$$ with more autonomy over their schedules. #2 sounds pretty boring unless you just want to clock in and out and have stability.
Suscipit consequatur et accusamus est animi velit quo omnis. Impedit rerum nisi nobis quasi exercitationem fuga.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...