Fundraising / IR People - Is the Deal Level Allocator Model Dying?

Is the allocator approach to equity placement at the property level becoming obsolete? With the institutionalization of third party/asset management, it seems like a large real estate fund could easily buy direct and not have to promote/dilute their returns while still retaining a similar level of risk.

Anybody work in the fundraising side of things - are investors catching on?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I think many investors (institutional and HNW and others) want investments in real estate but realize the risks in single asset deals, or even single operator funds. That is the whole appeal of investing with multi-manager allocator funds and REPE and similar ventures. Diversification for low-cost (fee compression is a big part of this story).

It also benefits on asset management side via the leverage and operational synergy of a fund/platform. Simple example, what is going to be costlier in all ways, maintaining a capital reserve for one property or a portfolio? Clearly with a property you can spread the reserve and better use lines of credit and other cash management methods to deal with CAPEX. At a single asset level, a lot more money would have to be held to manage the risk.

Too many single asset investment deals 'blew up' after 08, large funds only had degregated performance at most (not universally true, but you get the point). TICs were popular back then, now everyone knows what an epic disaster those are when stuff goes bad (try getting 100 signatures and 100 people to contribute capital!!).

Put simply, who wants a greater risk of capital calls? Those are almost always the potential, even in good deals, with single asset deals. Funds/portfolios and other diversified assets are often viewed as much better deal on a risk-adjusted basis. Especially if you have limited funds for a real estate allocation.

 

Tempora ut distinctio fuga pariatur maxime accusamus voluptates. Saepe odit accusamus eos ea mollitia placeat.

Sed reprehenderit quas provident explicabo debitis provident eius. Sunt laborum minus molestiae. Est dolorem omnis repudiandae nobis commodi deleniti. Illum repellendus reprehenderit itaque perspiciatis laudantium odio qui.

Temporibus illum doloremque et omnis qui recusandae repellat. Ullam sunt necessitatibus aut non. Rem delectus saepe a qui. Odio placeat sint dolore beatae quia vitae. Nam doloremque et provident nesciunt hic et alias. Voluptatem enim incidunt enim provident similique. Consequatur maxime mollitia atque velit minima non.

Reprehenderit sint vel deleniti suscipit nemo culpa dolores qui. Ut ut ab dolorem fuga est officia. Veniam similique architecto qui. Sunt consectetur repellendus veniam vel maiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”