Fundraising / IR People - Is the Deal Level Allocator Model Dying?

Is the allocator approach to equity placement at the property level becoming obsolete? With the institutionalization of third party/asset management, it seems like a large real estate fund could easily buy direct and not have to promote/dilute their returns while still retaining a similar level of risk.

Anybody work in the fundraising side of things - are investors catching on?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I think many investors (institutional and HNW and others) want investments in real estate but realize the risks in single asset deals, or even single operator funds. That is the whole appeal of investing with multi-manager allocator funds and REPE and similar ventures. Diversification for low-cost (fee compression is a big part of this story).

It also benefits on asset management side via the leverage and operational synergy of a fund/platform. Simple example, what is going to be costlier in all ways, maintaining a capital reserve for one property or a portfolio? Clearly with a property you can spread the reserve and better use lines of credit and other cash management methods to deal with CAPEX. At a single asset level, a lot more money would have to be held to manage the risk.

Too many single asset investment deals 'blew up' after 08, large funds only had degregated performance at most (not universally true, but you get the point). TICs were popular back then, now everyone knows what an epic disaster those are when stuff goes bad (try getting 100 signatures and 100 people to contribute capital!!).

Put simply, who wants a greater risk of capital calls? Those are almost always the potential, even in good deals, with single asset deals. Funds/portfolios and other diversified assets are often viewed as much better deal on a risk-adjusted basis. Especially if you have limited funds for a real estate allocation.

 

Quia sint nulla rerum officiis beatae nostrum. Ut ut et dolor totam reiciendis placeat id. Omnis tempora omnis officiis dolorem et quia. Voluptas veniam et repudiandae et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”