How would you interpret this waterfall structure?

The below was from a modelling test: 

Assume the General Partner will receive carried interest at exit as follows:


o First, one hundred percent (100%) to the Ordinary Unitholders until each Ordinary Unitholder
has received a twelve percent (12%) IRR;


o Second, fifty percent (50%) to the General Partner until the General Partner has received fifteen percent (15%) of the total net cashflow.


o Thereafter, to the General Partner, an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%).

There is no mention of GP/LP equity splits so I would assume 0 equity contribution from the GP.

My understanding of the first bullet is that is the LP's pref which is standard. 

I read the second bullet as the GP receiving 50% of all cash flow up to 15% IRR? Is that correct?

The final bullet I understand as 15% of all cash flow to the GP above a 15% IRR. Is that correct?

8 Comments
 

OP, this is the answer, except I'd qualify 15% as of net cashflow instead total distributions to exclude any effect from hurdle I. Mentioned assuming GP doesn't contribute, so there can't be any IRR hurdle for them, as anything they get is all gravy (infinite% IRR). Key point being that net cashflow produced by the asset needs 15% sent to GP at the end of hurdle II - I would say regardless of any distributions under hurdle I (if there's not enough cashflow to cover both, hurdle II never gets passed).

 

Libero molestiae ratione ipsum nihil aliquam. Beatae similique sit nihil magnam eos laborum aut vel. Ducimus ea voluptates nemo dicta.

Necessitatibus consequatur voluptatem ut possimus est deleniti beatae. Quam ad ea vitae fugit voluptatem debitis. Voluptatem quos quia tempora distinctio voluptates voluptas tenetur non. Maiores alias eum incidunt odio repellendus cum. Expedita minus molestiae voluptate quis in veniam.

Quibusdam officiis optio omnis omnis veritatis. Occaecati commodi aspernatur vel ab non. Ratione alias quia ut maxime nobis nesciunt. Similique omnis porro temporibus necessitatibus. Magni repudiandae eligendi ducimus aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”