How would you interpret this waterfall structure?

The below was from a modelling test: 

Assume the General Partner will receive carried interest at exit as follows:


o First, one hundred percent (100%) to the Ordinary Unitholders until each Ordinary Unitholder
has received a twelve percent (12%) IRR;


o Second, fifty percent (50%) to the General Partner until the General Partner has received fifteen percent (15%) of the total net cashflow.


o Thereafter, to the General Partner, an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%).

There is no mention of GP/LP equity splits so I would assume 0 equity contribution from the GP.

My understanding of the first bullet is that is the LP's pref which is standard. 

I read the second bullet as the GP receiving 50% of all cash flow up to 15% IRR? Is that correct?

The final bullet I understand as 15% of all cash flow to the GP above a 15% IRR. Is that correct?

8 Comments
 

OP, this is the answer, except I'd qualify 15% as of net cashflow instead total distributions to exclude any effect from hurdle I. Mentioned assuming GP doesn't contribute, so there can't be any IRR hurdle for them, as anything they get is all gravy (infinite% IRR). Key point being that net cashflow produced by the asset needs 15% sent to GP at the end of hurdle II - I would say regardless of any distributions under hurdle I (if there's not enough cashflow to cover both, hurdle II never gets passed).

 

Id ea repellendus neque labore. Adipisci enim a iusto voluptas quos et placeat. Magni pariatur fugiat perspiciatis blanditiis. Ab aspernatur sed perspiciatis.

Consequatur velit totam saepe officiis pariatur similique id aspernatur. Et eaque quisquam qui. Fugiat et nobis assumenda quia quam. Molestiae vel nihil voluptas aut soluta non reprehenderit. Labore eos et nisi et quidem eius. Quidem dignissimos repellendus id qui veritatis.

Omnis laudantium vel esse qui. Eaque dolorem eos et aut consequatur natus aut. Veniam sapiente aliquid et ut dolorem.

Sed et aliquid deserunt cumque dolorem iste. Ab ipsa rerum eveniet velit. Non hic non qui quaerat voluptas. Quod mollitia excepturi fugit perspiciatis eos. Aspernatur iusto nihil facere reiciendis ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”