MHC's: Why is park owned home income not underwritten by Freddie & Fannie?

I get that only land is the collateral for MHC's and homes are not part of the collateral so income from homes are not underwritten but my question is more about why do the Agencies not want parks with majority park owned homes in the 1st place? What is about homes that make them undesirable to the point that Agencies not want it as part of the collateral? In a foreclosure, if it's majority park owned homes in a park are part of the collateral, dont they have some value? They can be sold right? Appreciate the help, thank you!

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

From my recollection, it’s mainly two-fold. First, park-owned homes tend to be lower-quality assets with limited residual value. I think we generally assumed $10k or less of value per POH. Second, even if the delinquency rate is similar between tenant-owned and park-owned homes (and I believe it’s often higher for POH tenants), the financial impact is effectively doubled since you’re losing both the lot rent and the home rent.

Ultimately, it comes down to a risk-averse stance from the agencies. I’ve also thought I heard that Fannie has started allowing loans on communities with a limited percentage of POH's, under 20% or so. Is that not happening?

 

If a borrower defaults they are going to take their POHs with them and move them to another park they own. MHCs tend to have sticky occupancy since most folks can't afford to move their home, but if you have a high percentage of POHs and they all get pulled you end up with an empty park. Also the homes are not part of the collateral, they aren't REMIC compliant assets since they can be moved. Therefore the POHs are generally owned by a borrower affiliate and not the borrower.

 

Qui tempora est delectus repellat odio. Molestiae nihil corporis nulla consequatur fugit aut. Alias est aut odit laborum eius. Praesentium provident enim minus quaerat. Sit modi temporibus dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”