Resources for Learning How to Finance Affordable Housing - LIHTC Course

Hi all, first time poster / long time lurker. Posting under a new account.


My background is in financing for affordable multifamily projects and my business partners are real estate developers.


We're putting together some materials to help folks learn about commercial real estate development using LIHTC financing. This particular niche in commercial real estate often goes unnoticed, and I believe there's a need for user-friendly resources beyond what Novogradac and others offer


The materials will cover a wide range of topics, including the LIHTC program, funding sources, the application process, financial modeling, project planning, legal considerations, and asset management for successful affordable housing development, among other things.


Now, I'd like to ask for feedback from the WSO community. Please share your thoughts, suggestions, or feedback below or via direct message. At a minimum, comment if this is something you'd be interested in learning.


We're Excel monkeys and builders, but now considering giving the whole educational content thing a try as a way to bring more awareness to the industry / make it more accessible.


Thanks in advance for any valuable input.


-AffordableYIMBY

 

As someone going through the interview process right now for an affordable housing developer, would love and pay good money for a resource like this.

I've put in more hours than I care to divulge on the financial modeling front and feel pretty comfortable with most property types, however I would not include LIHTC or anything that includes a tax credit component on that list. It's also been difficult to find a walkthrough of the process from a to z - Novogrodac has some 10-15 year old youtube videos and there are some others (podcasts as well) that are helpful, but I feel so far from competent in this space still despite also dedicating a lot of time to learning the basics. The information sources just don't feel like they're catered towards an audience trying to break into the industry.

Hope that helps.

 

Thanks for sharing. It's great to know that something like this could be helpful to you.

I can relate to much of what you're feeling.

I also faced similar challenges when trying to get up to speed, and I felt that the existing content was more suited for people already working in the industry rather than those trying to enter it. The reference to 10-15 year old Novogradac YouTube videos reminds me of a manager I had earlier in my career who would print all his emails to read on paper—outdated and in need of some modernization.

 

Thanks for your response! I was able to supercharge my learning when I was looking to break into banking, so was a little disappointed to see I couldn't do the same with LIHTC.

Being on the AM side, what are some things you don't get enough exposure to that you would want to learn more about? 

 
Most Helpful

I think this would be phenomenal. I worked at a development shop for 3 years that really only did market-rate and commercial development.

I lead in structuring two large LIHTC deals and mannn, hundreds of hours digging through resources and calling hmfa. There really needs to be better resources out there to guide the development process - specifically mixed-income projects. It’s still not completely clear to me the exit strategies affordable developers take 10-15 years down the road of a development.

I think it would be incredibly useful to break down in a concise matter how affordable developers complete the capital stack with tax credit equity, construction financing, equity bridge, local subsidies, deferred dev fees, etc. Also a simpler explanation of how these developers measure returns on these properties - in terms of developer fees or cash flow and sale proceeds. Given the dire need for affordable housing in this country, this would be a phenomenal resource to put together.

 
stivkbuilt

I lead in structuring two large LIHTC deals and mannn, hundreds of hours digging through resources and calling hmfa. There really needs to be better resources out there to guide the development process - specifically mixed-income projects. It's still not completely clear to me the exit strategies affordable developers take 10-15 years down the road of a development.

Usually resyndication.  Depends on the municipality and how they went about financing projects.  Older deals actually have an exit into deregulation, but housing officials are getting smarter about this as that first wave hits and now structure the sub debt so that it balloons at the end of the term, which precludes repayment (and thus deregulation) and forces a new owner into extending the regulatory regime in return for restructuring the debt.

I think it would be incredibly useful to break down in a concise matter how affordable developers complete the capital stack with tax credit equity, construction financing, equity bridge, local subsidies, deferred dev fees, etc. Also a simpler explanation of how these developers measure returns on these properties - in terms of developer fees or cash flow and sale proceeds. Given the dire need for affordable housing in this country, this would be a phenomenal resource to put together.

I'm happy to chat about this with you or anyone else, but part of the issue is that the affordable housing as an asset class is incredibly atomized, both at the state and municipal level.  Part of the reason it is a lucrative business to be in is because it's nearly impossible to put together a comprehensive primer like this: knowledge and experience are the barriers to entry, rather than capital.

To take one example you asked about, deferred developer fees.  We could talk for hours about the relative benefits of deferring more or less of your fee up front, about how to pay more of it down, about who is driving that level of deferral (housing agencies?  tax credit investor?  QAP?), about whether it's statutorily mandated to defer a certain percentage of them.  Even bring it down to the individual level - what if I have a huge loss from some other project, does it make sense to pay more fees (income) and invest dollars instead, knowing I can write off the tax hit?

None of which is to say that regular market rate MF is "easy," but there is so much complexity in affordable that it becomes difficult to condense it into something easy to read.  This is made a million times more true by the fact that you're dealing with a whole new set of stakeholders, in terms of housing officials and local electeds, who have their own priorities to impose on a project beyond what a lender or equity investor wants.  Sure, all you "need" to do is make sure all your units are at 60% of AMI to qualify for 4% LIHTCs... but if your issuing agency is going to demand lower affordability bands, then the fact that the "rule" is 100% @ 60% AMI isn't worth the paper it's written on

 

Ozymandia, thanks for your response. I agree that knowledge and experience are huge barriers to entry. While I can't directly assist with gaining experience, I believe that making knowledge more accessible could be a positive for the industry as a whole.

To take one example you asked about, deferred developer fees.  We could talk for hours about the relative benefits of deferring more or less of your fee up front, about how to pay more of it down, about who is driving that level of deferral (housing agencies?  tax credit investor?  QAP?), about whether it's statutorily mandated to defer a certain percentage of them.  Even bring it down to the individual level - what if I have a huge loss from some other project, does it make sense to pay more fees (income) and invest dollars instead, knowing I can write off the tax hit?

I like how you answered the question about deferred dev fees with "it depends." I think that's the best response anyone could've provided given how much things vary by jurisdiction and deal structure.

Indeed, covering all the nuances of every market would be a daunting task and not the primary objective of the first iterations of the course or educational materials. However, I believe equipping people with the knowledge of which questions to ask and how to interpret the responses can be useful for someone navigating the process. For instance, instead of covering the A to Z on local priorities relating to housing, the curriculum could focus on how to effectively interact with and manage government stakeholders. 

 

This is the problem with affordable housing and why I don't consider it a profession anymore and is doomed to move the needle in a meaningful way. The lack of standardization is a real issue. It is truly experiential and everyone does it differently depending on the locals initiative from year to year.  It's really holding back the ability for housing to be built in a meaningful way. Sorry for that small rant but Novogradac is probably the best source. There is also an NDC certification called RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM™.  Hope that helps. 

 

This is the problem with affordable housing and why I don't consider it a profession anymore and is doomed to move the needle in a meaningful way. The lack of standardization is a real issue. It is truly experiential and everyone does it differently depending on the locals initiative from year to year.  It's really holding back the ability for housing to be built in a meaningful way. 

I think you're confusing local zoning and politics with affordable housing.  New York City is one of the most anti-developer municipalities in the country, has one of the most byzantine and expensive approvals process, and has the highest cost of construction... and yet they manage to reach their volume cap allocation every year.  The complaints here are in regards to right development, not the ability to close on subsidized housing.

And the fact that it's so dependent on being experienced is exactly what it is a profession.  A business in which any idiot with a couple million dollars can come and do well for a time (before it all crashes down, see Tides Equities) isn't a career, it's a casino.  People will do well in affordable housing precisely because they make it their career; you can't just buy a Yr 15 re-syndication project and expect to magically profit the same way that plenty of people seem to think they can buy a luxury rental building and make a fortune when rents go up.

 

I think you would see heavy demand. Novagradac literature and conferences are very expensive and do not necessarily view the development from the GP/Sponsor/Develoloper perspective. 

For my part, the most helpful would be detailed sources and uses. S&U to include debt, equity, bridge, tax equity, local subsidy, TIF financing, developers fee etc. Of particular interest would be how the developer fee is actually capitalized and structured in practice. 

Thanks for the post!

 

Heavy demand sounds like some good idea validation. Thanks.

For my part, the most helpful would be detailed sources and uses. S&U to include debt, equity, bridge, tax equity, local subsidy, TIF financing, developers fee etc. Of particular interest would be how the developer fee is actually capitalized and structured in practice. 

I've your request to include content on the S&U, thanks. 

Yep, Novogradac seems to be the default for anyone looking to learn more.

What's your experience with the affordable industry? Are you on the development or financing side?

 

Quod nulla amet deleniti explicabo dolor perferendis. Omnis rerum fugiat nesciunt in. Illum aspernatur sint autem enim veritatis dolore. Accusantium omnis est corrupti et magnam libero repudiandae dolore. Quia officiis dicta voluptate voluptatibus exercitationem.

Amet inventore soluta repellat sed cupiditate qui. Corporis reprehenderit voluptas possimus. Iure consequatur earum laborum aut nesciunt.

Vel neque et omnis unde. Quae exercitationem atque minima modi dignissimos et.

Veritatis consequatur quos similique perferendis optio. Ducimus quaerat et sequi consequuntur labore totam. Accusamus molestiae vel porro rerum illum. Tempora ad modi vel sunt et est rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”