Who cares! Many firms are struggling today. Yes. They bought some bad deals, so did many others! Let it go folks.

They have no equity in their deals.  The fact that you can't understand how this, plus the fact that they clearly don't know how to operate real estate and we're just planning on flipping their assets to someone else to hold the bag, makes them fundamentally different from a struggling shop that is suffering alongside their investors, makes it pretty obvious you work at a syndicator

 

Rise does pretty simple capital stacks, 60-65% LTC and tight rate caps for 3 years, no mezz or pref. Coming across them in Texas they do tend to overpay and close in 60 days so brokers love them, and I know they have a few more under contract. 

Tides has a good chunk of their portfolio one missed payment away from lender taking control. I would not be surprised if by this time next year, they fall from ~30k unit portfolio to <10K. The crazy thing with Tides is the whole operation is built around flipping. Given their portfolio size they have a very lean corporate staff and only recently have they been hiring trying to build a team that knows how to manage and operate. With their reputation I'd be hard to recruit "A" level talent so this will be interesting to watch. 

 
MPBYO

Rise does pretty simple capital stacks, 60-65% LTC and tight rate caps for 3 years, no mezz or pref. Coming across them in Texas they do tend to overpay and close in 60 days so brokers love them, and I know they have a few more under contract. 

Tides has a good chunk of their portfolio one missed payment away from lender taking control. I would not be surprised if by this time next year, they fall from ~30k unit portfolio to <10K. The crazy thing with Tides is the whole operation is built around flipping. Given their portfolio size they have a very lean corporate staff and only recently have they been hiring trying to build a team that knows how to manage and operate. With their reputation I'd be hard to recruit "A" level talent so this will be interesting to watch. 

They have only done simple capital stacks since the market has forced it on them

They are going to lose a lot of investors a lot of money as there 2021 and Q1 and 2 2022 deals were awful.  There recent deals are still awful but they are putting more equity in so it just means they probably do not get foreclosed.  But no one is making any money on any of their deals anytime soon

 

LOL - the dream is to have as little money as possible in deals and fee & promote yourself!  This is capitalism 101.  If you can find a cheap guarantor or low pref, that’s how millions and billions are made!  Why do you think family office is better than institutional capital? You are capped on fees (acq and AM) and promote and usually institutions want more of your capital in deals!  

 

Sure, but these aren't institutions or family offices that are getting their equity wiped out.  These are unsophisticated middle-class investors who were milked for fees after being promised the dream of retiring early with passive income on social media.

 

I get that, but people need to be aware. It can't just be oh I'm middle class and unsophisticated someone sold me a dream if I invest $100k I'll  insane returns and retire early. Everyone has to do their own due diligence. Also who thinks it's a good idea to plow every last dollar into one investment as well. It's like the Madoff ponzi scheme, people saying they have nothing left after investing everything into one entity like what are you doing.

The more I'm in the industry the more I see how many naive people there are and it candidly surprises me. How is there not a basic level of risk management at the minimum even if you don't understand all the nuances of a deal you're investing in.

 

LOL - the dream is to have as little money as possible in deals and fee & promote yourself!  This is capitalism 101.  If you can find a cheap guarantor or low pref, that’s how millions and billions are made!  Why do you think family office is better than institutional capital? You are capped on fees (acq and AM) and promote and usually institutions want more of your capital in deals!  

Sean? Ryan? Zach? Is that you? lol, The dream is to make a profit with as little money as possible. I see why your firm (Rise or Tides) is failing now...you forgot about the profit part lol

 
Most Helpful

LOL - the dream is to have as little money as possible in deals and fee & promote yourself!  This is capitalism 101.  If you can find a cheap guarantor or low pref, that’s how millions and billions are made!  Why do you think family office is better than institutional capital? You are capped on fees (acq and AM) and promote and usually institutions want more of your capital in deals!  

LOL.  Another unscrupulous fraudster rearing their head.

The dream of any actual real estate professional is to have your investors make a ton of money and thus pay you huge promotes, and then have them plow all that into the next deal.  The dream of guys at Rise48 or Tides is to buy as many deals as possible, make as many fees as possible, and then leave their investors holding the bag for the absolute shitshow they created through not understanding how to manage assets.

Millions and billions are absolutely not made through this kind of behavior, except in tech.  Reputation matters, and no one deal is rich enough to make someone 9 figures of net worth.  These syndicators are little better than 3 card monte guys - they'll get a lot of naive rubes to play the game with them, they'll make their fees, and they'll move on - but they'll never create anything of value, because that was never the point.

Hell, two of the best ways to build value in this business, through long term asset appreciation and taking advantage of depreciation, they'll never get the benefit of!  I'm sure Sean and Ryan made millions of dollars each in fees - the question is what happens when they need to start paying back lenders to keep the place afloat.  Will they do so, and then bring themselves back to square one in a business they couldn't do in the first place?  Or bail, and take their $25mm or whatever, and go find something else to do?

 

Truth! If you can crystallize or pref burn off after x number of years, you are in a solid spot!  If you have 3-tier pref ending at 18 before 30 or 40 promote.  You are not going to make money.  You don’t make money on 10% equity in the game.  That’s the owner money that can’t be touched.  Your salary is based on fees and promote if you work for good folks is how you make money if you are the deal sponsor or associates of the deal team.   But I want the LP taking all the risk!!! OPM, read the book!!  

 

I've been actively posting on the Tides thread recently about their immanent failures. Long and the short of it is here:

- They are delinquent of a few Readycap loans. Those notes are being actively shopped by the traditional note brokers in NYC, but are still holding out for 97-100% of par. Values are closer to 65-70% of par so TBD on who scoops them up. 

- MF1 in deep deep caca with them, had to do a few mods to get them through (or just to) Q1 2024. Mostly structured them as accrual pieces. MF1 doesn't really care to take them back because berkshire, but also a bunch of other issuance related reasons why they mod'd those loans. Tides now has senior loan that have accrual pieces in front of pref loans with accrual pieces that are PG'd and no more reserves. That's soon to be done-zo. 

- All their loans are in servicing pretty much (link below), and their Equity (AMC and MCP) are both running around trying to hold back as long as they can.

https://crenews.com/2023/10/19/9-loans-totaling-299-8mln-against-tides-…

Rise is Tides 2.0, so assuming they'll fall just after Tides, but haven't heard of them being as illegal and dirty as Tides has been in their operations so not sure where they stand.

I'm going to keep posting about Tides loans and work outs etc. on the other forum as it becomes more public and I know that thread is the one that the Real Deal folks follow for updates. A few other non public info is still in the works, and everyone of the sharks I know who have cash ready to put out for their notes are just waiting for them to hemorrhage a bit more and then its going to be a feeding frenzy.

 
fundinvestoraz

Interesting - looks like the Rise pumper executives have disabled comments in their LinkedIn posts : image-20231023192414-2

They've slowly started getting more questions on posts asking about things going wrong so checks out they want to nip that.

 

I recently reviewed a Rise recap pref opportunity for all of 30 seconds before I killed it.

The highlights were as follows:

  • Asset basis of +/- $55M
  • Vacancy of 14% on T12, 19% vacancy on T3
  • T12 NOI equated to a 3.30% YOC. T3 is a 2.74% YOC. But they expect Yr 1 and Yr 2 YOC to be 4.7% and 5.2% respectively via a combination of sub 5% vacancy and 20% lower Opex Ratios. (LOL).

I've seen several Tides and Rise deals all with a similar profile over the last 9 months. However, I have also seen deals from both groups that they'll be able to get out of and were competitive. Those deals however (at least for Tides) had true institutional JVs (think groups with $50B+ AUM). Granted, the deals that look okay on paper are far outweighed by deals with the profile i described above.

That's to say, both groups have a ton of garbage in their portfolio they only get out of if the Fed cuts rates back to 0 without crashing the economy and sucking whatever liquidity is left in this illiquid market out of it.

 
Subordinatecapitalape

I recently reviewed a Rise recap pref opportunity for all of 30 seconds before I killed it.

The highlights were as follows:

  • Asset basis of +/- $55M
  • Vacancy of 14% on T12, 19% vacancy on T3
  • T12 NOI equated to a 3.30% YOC. T3 is a 2.74% YOC. But they expect Yr 1 and Yr 2 YOC to be 4.7% and 5.2% respectively via a combination of sub 5% vacancy and 20% lower Opex Ratios. (LOL).

I've seen several Tides and Rise deals all with a similar profile over the last 9 months. However, I have also seen deals from both groups that they'll be able to get out of and were competitive. Those deals however (at least for Tides) had true institutional JVs (think groups with $50B+ AUM). Granted, the deals that look okay on paper are far outweighed by deals with the profile i described above.

That's to say, both groups have a ton of garbage in their portfolio they only get out of if the Fed cuts rates back to 0 without crashing the economy and sucking whatever liquidity is left in this illiquid market out of it.

Tides has to be done soon 

 

Knowing these guys if everything looks good at the senior level, then there is definitely garbage pref/side letters in there silently killing the deal.

They don't disclose the subordinate shit to their investors, even their "institutional" equity, because the way they see it is it's all PG'd by them and no claims on the property so not necessary. Of course that's a false narrative because of the claims of cash flow etc. but there isn't a single deal they are holding onto that isn't underwater.

 

25 of their 29 phoenix deals are under 90 percent occupied and have been for year according to costar. Thats massive shortfalls. 

 

I used to think Zach was just a dumb guy who has no clue what he is doing but who is basically a well meaning, earnest guy. However, given his wildly deceptive video response and media interviews, I think he is a bad guy who knows exactly what he is doing and could care less about his investors

 

Here's a weird observation, but have you noticed all Rise's candid videos they post on LinkedIn about them explaining something to their computer (which I suspect is bullshit), those computers are Macs?

I could be off, but who uses Macs in this industry? Excel is so much harder to use on a Mac, as well as really anything that needs to be done. I'm sure they have a few analysts doing the lifts on PCs, but just odd because presumably they should be reviewing the models, etc. 

Just an observation.  

image-20231024165631-1

 

Has the rise pref raise been reported on or is that just what JLL has started talking to potential investors about?

I would not take that deal.

 
plzkeepanon

$150m of debt in default from Tides and JLL shopping for preferred equity to save Rise48 deals… hallelujah  

I know the JLL broker, not super well, but have gone to him for advice here and there in the past. I know there's a few bro brokers that have done a lot of repeat business with Tides but not sure how I feel about facilitating transactions with poor stewards of capital... I mean, these guys are doing their jobs (exceptionally well), but feels *just* a tad bit dirty

 

Can he get in trouble for misleading investors on this stuff? It seems like the pitch decks on his recent purchases should have had a disclaimer about his other deals going bad.

 

While I’m not shocked, I’m saddened that they stooped that low. Here they are sitting on the precipice of a massive, career-altering disaster, and they have the audacity to tell unsophisticated folks “how to raise and manage capital”. Not only that, but one of the “benefits” of their highest-tier class is “preferential 90/10 splits on Rise48 deals”.

I’m sure in their minds it’s just more fee income to bilk people out of…and potentially more equity coming in the door.

As much as I love the multifamily industry and a lot of the people in it, I can’t fucking stand this “LinkedIn influencer/syndicator” model that is so rampant these days. Unless you’re an absolute superstar, it takes years to develop the skills to effectively manage operations and capital. Halfway timing a market cycle (before losing everything) doesn’t make you an expert, it makes you a degenerate gambler (with OPM) at best…

 

I don't know if it's a graphics quirk on WSO or if this is the way it looks on their site, but I have to admit I'm laughing my ass off at the idea that they couldn't even get "Fundamental" right, and it reals "Fundament Al"

 

Aut itaque perspiciatis ea voluptas deleniti. Aut alias voluptatum in et totam in eaque culpa. Cumque qui nam inventore et. Qui magnam qui magnam est sed.

Earum praesentium temporibus velit est molestiae autem. Cupiditate est reiciendis placeat aut aliquam dicta expedita. Et atque voluptatibus impedit distinctio voluptas velit.

Placeat pariatur minus velit et. Molestias quia voluptatem in ea voluptatem voluptatem ex. Maxime amet distinctio quam odio maxime libero tempore. Blanditiis nostrum doloremque quaerat repellat consequatur repellendus perspiciatis sit.

Molestias ea neque rerum consequatur dolor aut. Soluta magni eum atque rerum architecto ea. Ut vero inventore ab accusamus aut id pariatur.

 

Enim qui sed non est. Facere doloribus optio voluptas provident labore quia. Doloribus culpa blanditiis est rerum et velit. Eum beatae consequatur deserunt repudiandae. Ut velit dolores aliquid voluptate.

Accusantium sed enim perspiciatis. Dicta voluptatem corrupti ut porro ipsum in. Dolor in officia fugit perspiciatis eius in. Temporibus et minus officia debitis.

Harum et earum mollitia labore aperiam qui ducimus explicabo. Ratione ullam culpa rerum quo repellendus nihil atque. Omnis in numquam dolorum similique laborum. Asperiores autem et architecto sint autem facilis quia. Officiis velit sequi impedit ut possimus et voluptates. Commodi natus voluptatum aliquam repudiandae. Iusto et aperiam nobis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”