UvA vs EUR econometrics master

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of your options and considerations:

1. MSc Financial Econometrics at UvA (University of Amsterdam)

• Pros:
  • UvA has a strong reputation in econometrics and finance, particularly in Amsterdam, which is a growing financial hub.
  • The program's focus on econometrics could provide a solid quantitative foundation, which is highly valued in investment banking roles, especially in areas like trading, structuring, or quantitative analysis.
  • A change in location from Rotterdam could offer a fresh perspective and networking opportunities.
• Cons:
  • While UvA is respected, Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) is often considered stronger in finance and economics, particularly for IB placement.
  • Amsterdam may not offer as many direct IB networking opportunities as London or other major financial hubs.

2. MSc Quantitative Finance at EUR

• Pros:
  • EUR is highly regarded for finance-related programs and has a strong track record of placing graduates into investment banking roles.
  • The Quantitative Finance program is tailored for roles requiring advanced mathematical and financial modeling skills, which are critical in IB.
  • Staying at EUR could leverage your existing network and familiarity with the institution.
• Cons:
  • Remaining in Rotterdam might feel repetitive, especially if you’re looking for a change in environment.
  • Limited exposure to new networks or geographies compared to moving to Amsterdam or taking a gap year.

3. MSc Financial Economics at EUR

• Pros:
  • This program is broader than Quantitative Finance, offering a mix of finance and economics, which could be advantageous for roles beyond quantitative-heavy positions in IB.
  • EUR’s reputation in finance and economics could still provide strong placement opportunities in IB.
• Cons:
  • Similar to the Quantitative Finance program, staying in Rotterdam might not align with your desire for a change in geography.
  • The broader focus might not be as specialized as the other two options for quantitative roles.

4. Gap Year

• Pros:
  • A gap year could allow you to explore programs in other geographies, particularly in the UK, which aligns with your long-term goal of working in London.
  • You could apply to top-tier programs like LSE, Imperial, or Oxford, which have strong IB placement records in London.
  • It provides time to gain relevant internships or work experience, strengthening your profile for competitive programs and IB roles.
• Cons:
  • A gap year introduces uncertainty and delays your entry into the workforce.
  • You’ll need to ensure you use the time productively to avoid gaps in your CV.

Recommendation:

If your ultimate goal is to work in London, taking a gap year to apply to top UK programs (e.g., LSE MSc Finance, Imperial MSc Finance, or Oxford MSc Financial Economics) could be the most strategic move. These programs have direct pipelines to London IB roles and offer unparalleled networking opportunities.

However, if you prefer to start your Master’s immediately, the MSc Quantitative Finance at EUR would likely provide the strongest alignment with IB ambitions due to its specialized focus and EUR’s reputation. The MSc Financial Econometrics at UvA is a close second, especially if you value a change in location and a strong quantitative foundation.

Sources: MSc in Economics to get into S&T, European Master in Finance programmes (pre-experience), Complete European master guide for S&T/Quant position, LBS vs UCL vs Imperial for IB, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/uk-master-in-finance-advice?customgpt=1