3 Comments
 
Best Response

Found the answer, courtesy of Elaine Lin from Morgan Stanley:

Roll-down and carry allow an investor to estimate the PNL of a swap over a given horizon assuming an unchanged rate environment. Below, we calculate roll-down and carry separately for a receiving fixed position on an interest rate swap.

As with that of a bond (or any financial instrument), the carry on a swap is the difference between what the investor receives (a fixed coupon) and what the investor pays (a floating financing rate) over the investment horizon. Implicitly, the carry can be “locked in” at the inception of the swap by paying on the swap (at the same rate) forward to the horizon date, and the forward price of this swap should reflect this carry. That is, Forward Price = Spot Price - Carry

This identity allows us to easily calculate carry as the difference between the spot price (0 for an ATM swap) of the swap and the forward price of the swap at the same rate. Whereas carry can be determined by today’s market prices, the roll-down of a swap makes an assumption about the shape of the curve at horizon. At horizon (e.g., 6m), a 5 year swap will be a 4½ year swap. The roll-down estimates the value of the swap (at the current 5 year rate) under the assumption that the yield curve is unchanged from today. Therefore, the roll-down is the difference between the value of this shorter-term (or “rolled-down”) swap and the value of the spot swap (0 for ATM).

 

So would it only provide utility to mention a rolled-down swap with a "rolled-down" date in relation to a future date which would then be the ATM spot swap? Something like: There is a negative difference in the roll-down between the 4.5 yr YTM swap and the spot rate which is around 3yrs since contract inception which provided it was 5yrs in length?

 

Alias dicta voluptas quod ut dolor officia nemo. Quis cupiditate magni dignissimos. Laboriosam optio magnam quis perferendis sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”