Futures vs Forwards and basis question

Hi all,

As far as i knew these 2 were relatively similar except for credit risk and mark to market. But why is it that some commodity thedgers often prefer forwards, saying that there is no basis risk...? isint there basis risk in forwards as well?

thanks

BP

10 Comments
 

Well, if you were looking to buy a specific type of crude that doesnt have a futures contract, then you'd be subject to basis risk if you were to simply buy WTI futures. However, if you find a guy that produces the type of crude you need, then a forward contract with him would not have such a commodity mismatch. But if you still went with a WTI forward contract, then you subject yourself to basis risk, since you need a slightly different grade of crude.

Of course, credit risk prevails in any forward contract.

Hope that answers the question.

 

YGS, it's way simpler than that. Futures are standardized and processed via clearing houses which lowers their default chances to zero. On the other hand, forwards are the result of private agreements, nobody is going to guarantee for that, hence why they are used for different purposes and closed in different ways.

 
Best Response

There are further differences between futures and forwards that are more subtle but arguably even more important from a practitioner's point of view, not just credit risk and MtM.

First of all, credit risk of forwards is complex because forwards are typically subject to various collateral pledging agreements. Yes, for futures the pnl is daily MtM at exchange settlement px but for forwards collateral is also exchanged. Credit risk mitigation for forwards is one of the least academically understood topics out there.

Here's an example. I can tell you that vast fortunes (approaching 10 figures) were made (and lost) in 2008 arising from the difference between collateral requirements for forwards and futures on the Nikkei index. Any guesses why? If you can think of a good reason why a Nikkei OTC forward might trade at a higher or lower price than an equivalent exchange-listed future, then you will definitely impress your professors/any derivatives trader.

 
oompaboompaThere are further differences between futures and forwards that are more subtle but arguably even more important from a practitioner's point of view, not just credit risk and MtM.

First of all, credit risk of forwards is complex because forwards are typically subject to various collateral pledging agreements. Yes, for futures the pnl is daily MtM at exchange settlement px but for forwards collateral is also exchanged. Credit risk mitigation for forwards is one of the least academically understood topics out there.

Here's an example. I can tell you that vast fortunes (approaching 10 figures) were made (and lost) in 2008 arising from the difference between collateral requirements for forwards and futures on the Nikkei index. Any guesses why? If you can think of a good reason why a Nikkei OTC forward might trade at a higher or lower price than an equivalent exchange-listed future, then you will definitely impress your professors/any derivatives trader.

Just a wild guess, I haven't taken any classes on this - does the discount/premium result from differences in the credit rating of the counterparty vs. the exchange/clearinghouse? Edit: or not necessarily "credit rating," maybe "credit worthiness" or something would be a more appropriate term? Did it have something to do with the underlying value of the collateral?

 
oompaboompa Here's an example. I can tell you that vast fortunes (approaching 10 figures) were made (and lost) in 2008 arising from the difference between collateral requirements for forwards and futures on the Nikkei index. Any guesses why? If you can think of a good reason why a Nikkei OTC forward might trade at a higher or lower price than an equivalent exchange-listed future, then you will definitely impress your professors/any derivatives trader.

Gonna take a couple of stabs -

Forwards can have various collateral agreements depending on the counterparty, so not necessarily cash or in the same currency, which means some securities can be funded at a cheaper rate and posted as collateral?

LIBOR vs. TIBOR discounting?

 

Doloremque quis cumque et fugit cumque qui quo assumenda. Dolorum sed est molestiae aliquam. Repellat consequuntur est molestiae sunt magni. Debitis nulla doloremque et tenetur vitae architecto.

Quibusdam aut natus dignissimos illum aliquid. Ipsum iste ea fugiat possimus nostrum voluptatibus laborum fugiat. Laborum vero eum quae dolor dolores asperiores ad perspiciatis.

Expedita aliquam saepe sint tempore tempora repudiandae unde voluptas. Molestias aut ab qui ullam. Ducimus placeat qui mollitia voluptates.

Nostrum voluptatibus dolorem minus. Quisquam delectus odio officia nobis sint. Pariatur vel voluptatem et aut. Omnis laudantium vel ea doloribus vel tempore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”