Why is rho positive for call options?

Hi everyone, I was wondering why rho is positive for call options. Intuitively, if interest rates go down, the price of the underlying security would increase (lower discount rate -> higher present value -> higher share price), so the price of the call option would also increase. However, rho is positive for call options, and negative for put options, but one would expect the opposite. Thanks.

12 Comments
 

rates fall >> cost of carrying position falls so the opportunity cost of buying the underlying instead of the option falls >> holding call is relatively less attractive than holding the underlying >> rho, partial to options value wrt rates is positive

rates fall >> present value of strike increases, makes call option less valuable since ur effectively paying more than pv terms when/if exercised in future >> rho then is positive

 

yieldcurveisdaddy

rates fall >> cost of carrying position falls so the opportunity cost of buying the underlying instead of the option falls >> holding call is relatively less attractive than holding the underlying >> rho, partial to options value wrt rates is positive

rates fall >> present value of strike increases, makes call option less valuable since ur effectively paying more than pv terms when/if exercised in future >> rho then is positive

how come you're mentioning the opportunity cost of buying the underlying instead of the option when in the first part you mention cost of carry [of holding the option]?  and why would holding the call be less attractive when the cost of carry falls?

 
Most Helpful

your thinking is correct, however you're thinking too much CAPM and not enough put call parity. 1) the PV of the strike price also decreases when rates rise 2) opportunity cost increases when rates rise

1) rates rise --> higher discount rate --> lower PV of the strike price --> cheaper to exercise the options --> more attractive options you're holding (for calls) --> option value rises --> profit

essentially: impact of rates on the strike price > impact of rates on the underlying asset price

2) opportunity cost - when rates rise, holding cash doesn't make sense because you can put that money elsewhere and earn % (aka more $). Buying a call is cheaper than buying the underlying (yet you can still get the same upside exposure) so you're gonna buy the call over the underlying. And remember, every extra dollar you spend on the underlying over the cheaper call option, that's more cash you could've parked somewhere and earned interest on. More demand for call = call increases in value. ||||| Say I have $10,000 to invest. I can 1) buy $10,000 worth of stock via shares or 2) buy a "$1,000" call and book the rest ($9,000) into an interest bearing account. 

 
margin_calls

your thinking is correct, however you're thinking too much CAPM and not enough put call parity. 1) the PV of the strike price also decreases when rates rise 2) opportunity cost increases when rates rise

1) rates rise --> higher discount rate --> lower PV of the strike price --> cheaper to exercise the options --> more attractive options you're holding (for calls) --> option value rises --> profit

essentially: impact of rates on the strike price > impact of rates on the underlying asset price

2) opportunity cost - when rates rise, holding cash doesn't make sense because you can put that money elsewhere and earn % (aka more $). Buying a call is cheaper than buying the underlying (yet you can still get the same upside exposure) so you're gonna buy the call over the underlying. And remember, every extra dollar you spend on the underlying over the cheaper call option, that's more cash you could've parked somewhere and earned interest on. More demand for call = call increases in value. ||||| Say I have $10,000 to invest. I can 1) buy $10,000 worth of stock via shares or 2) buy a "$1,000" call and book the rest ($9,000) into an interest bearing account. 

re: 2, doesn't it make sense to earn interest on cash when rates are high?  or do you mean holding the underlying doesn't make sense.

 

Don’t overcomplicate. The underlying of an option is a forward. With a call, you’re long a forward. Given an increase in rates, forwards increase in value. Thus, the call increases in value too. Hence, rho is positive.

 

The way I think about it is all based on the exercise cash flows.

A call allows you to control 100 shares. The amount you pay in the future to exercise the call is worth less in the future than it is today because of time value of money. Increasing rates make that value even less.

Opposite is true for puts. The price you receive from selling the 100 shares in the future is worth less in the future than it is now.

 

While a call option's positive rho is fundamentally linked to the underlying forward's sensitivity to interest rates, a comprehensive understanding requires considering additional factors. The impact of interest rates on option prices is influenced by time to maturity, dividend yield, and implied volatility. To deepen analysis, exploring put-call parity, option pricing models, and the volatility of interest rates is essential.

Learn 100+ options strategies
 

It’s really all about the forward price. Rates up forward price up call value up. A call is just a forward with a payoff floor. Puts are opposite since they are the inverse of calls

 

Atque ut vitae architecto voluptatem laboriosam. Ut et non provident aut nesciunt fugiat totam. Explicabo rerum cumque consequatur omnis at molestiae ex.

Quod sed facere sint dolorum. Vitae sint earum distinctio. Incidunt facere velit alias perspiciatis voluptates minus. Voluptatibus itaque maiores consequatur non odit reprehenderit corrupti numquam. Nemo et perspiciatis perspiciatis ut quae atque molestias.

Corrupti qui labore at repellendus sunt. Modi aut laboriosam quas nulla sunt est facere. Eligendi dignissimos sit laboriosam consequatur quia a. Perferendis optio aut illo est. Et incidunt accusantium fugit doloribus. Adipisci quis neque tempora quia. Nesciunt sed quasi eligendi consequatur nihil itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”