A reading list for based financiers

The Story of Civilization by Will Durant and Ariel Durant

durant & durant

Bronze Age Mindset by Bronze Age Pervert

Bap bam

Storm of Steel by Ernst Jünger

storm of steel

Journey to the End of the Night by Louis-Ferdinand Céline

LF céline

The Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler

spengler

Essays and Aphorisms by Arthur Schopenhauer

schopenhauer

Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche

nietzs

The Iliad and the Odyssey by Homer

iliad

An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives by Mencius Moldbug

open letter

Anatomy of the State by Murray Rothbard

rothbard

Democracy by Hans-Hermann Hoppe

hoppe

Submission by Michel Houellebecq

submission h

The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord

debord

Archeofuturism by Guillaume Faye

faye

Fanged Noumena by Nick Land

fanged noumena

Capitalist Realism by Mark Fisher 

mark fisher

64 Comments
 

God and Man at Yale seems could be the dumbest book imaginable.  Mr. Buckley cries about how Yale should go back to its Christian roots, but if he applied to Yale back in those times he would be denied himself for simply being Catholic since Yale catered to upper class Protestants.

 

I know that you get a lot of flak on this forum, but I agree with this take. If the hierarchies / systems from Buckley's school of thought were ever actually applied, many modern conservatives would find themselves disenfranchised. Relating to the text specifically, I think it has a valid point that academic freedom is important and has arguably been on the decline-- but on the flip side, if you're arguing stances that deny equality between peoples, you should do so in thoughtful manner and expect pushback. 

 

2/10

Not even Le Camp des Saints by Raspail.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

I hesitated to add it to the list but eventually thought that it was too radical and would scare away people who would have otherwise been interested in the other books. 

 
Most Helpful

It's a novel. In terms of ideological content, it's far less radical than BAP or Spengler.

Noteworthy to mention, the huge amount of content on the right about decline and civilization collapse. It's fine and dandy to shit on liberals as the cause of it, but conservatives really struggle to put forward something to be optimistic about, an idea of society to believe in. It's like Christianity but without redemption and paradise at the end.

Liberals on the other hand do an amazing work at promoting infantile, simplistic visions for the future, obscuring the details and dishonestly covering up problems.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

This is a solid list, im glad there are others in finance

A few things to add if were only doing based lit

Poli-sci

- Schmitt, concept of the political 

- Lewis, the art of being ruled

- Uncle Ted, the industrial society and its future

Lit

- Mishima, sun and steel, confessions of a mask

- Junger, eumeswil

- McCarthy, blood meridian

 

is this more of a political book list? wasn't expecting stuff like intelligent investor or cliche books but more of investor mindset books and think differently than the heard. 

 

What about other books by Houellebecq? The Elementary Particles is considered one of his best works, and it is very revealing of the state of Western Culture. Honestly one of my favorite books overall. Platform is another good Houellebecq book that discusses Islamic extremism as well. 

 

A glaring misreading of Soumission and of Houellebecq, in general.

Islam, extremism, minorities — these are not the objects of Houellebecq's critique. Rather, his project is levied at you and I and the current Western zeitgeist. The Islamization of Europe in Soumission is but a stand-in for any host of 'submissionist' ideologies which feast on the present's terminal crisis, that of the fate of humanism and freedom in the face of techno-capitalism and its antisocial regimentation of human life. Houellebecq does not seek to describe, predict, or assign a normative value to any given future, but rather elucidates our own self-deception and emptiness, regardless of political leaning.

 

I was considering reading through Story of Civilization but it's a ridiculous amount of text. Still wanted a book with a solid overview of world history, so picked up The History of the World by Roberts. It's a much more reasonable 1700 pages. Haven't gotten through it much but so far so good. Reviews on it are strong as well

 

Many of the books listed here are written by far-right or Neo-Nazi authors and advocate for violence. 

Here's a quote from Siege, written by a Neo-Nazi:

“Those of you with backgrounds similar to mine in the American National Socialist Movement will be among the first to sadly admit that it was indeed a damnable shame that Hitler did not, in fact, kill at least six million Jews during the War.”

Industrial Society and its Future was written by Ted Kaczynski, the notorious terrorist known as the Unabomber

Les Camp De Saints is another white nationalist novel about a migrant invasion.  Here's a quote

[The book repeatedly characterizes non-whites as sexual carnivores, as in this scene aboard the refugee fleet that is heading for Europe.] But in time, very slowly, the flesh [aboard the ships] began to seethe. ... Perhaps it was the heat... . Most of all, the natural drive of a people who never found sex to be sin. ... Everywhere, a mass of hands and mouths, of phalluses and rumps. ... Young boys, passed from hand to hand. Young girls, barely ripe ... waking to the silent play of eager lips. ... Men with women, men with men, women with women, men with children... . And so, in a welter of dung and debauch — and hope as well — the Last Chance Armada pushed on toward the West.

From Democracy, the God that Failed, author Hans Herman Hoppe longs for the bad old days when we could lynch blacks if they went to the wrong town after sunset:

Instead, one would be on the right path toward restoring the freedom of association and exclusion implied in the institution of private property, if only towns and villages could and would do what they did as a matter of course until well into the nineteenth century in Europe and the United States. There would be signs regarding entrance requirements to the town … (for example, no beggars, bums, or homeless, but also no homosexuals, drug users, Jews, Moslems, Germans or Zulus).

 

Also read the following:

- How to be an antiracist by Ibram Kendi

- Utopia for realist by Rutger Bregman

- Sapiens by Harari

Vademecum for dystopias. 

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

And here comes the Drumpftard with yet another retarded post.

Many of the books listed here are written by far-right or Neo-Nazi authors and advocate for violence. 

Here's a quote from Siege, written by a Neo-Nazi:

Industrial Society and its Future was written by Ted Kaczynski, the notorious terrorist known as the Unabomber

Les Camp De Saints is another white nationalist novel about a migrant invasion.  Here's a quote

This is the most obvious association fallacy I have ever seen. Literally none of those books is in the list you dimwit.

From Democracy, the God that Failed, author Hans Herman Hoppe longs for the bad old days when we could lynch blacks if they went to the wrong town after sunset:

Instead, one would be on the right path toward restoring the freedom of association and exclusion implied in the institution of private property, if only towns and villages could and would do what they did as a matter of course until well into the nineteenth century in Europe and the United States. There would be signs regarding entrance requirements to the town … (for example, no beggars, bums, or homeless, but also no homosexuals, drug users, Jews, Moslems, Germans or Zulus).

And for the only book that actually is in the list, anyone who will read the quote will notice the false attribution fallacy as Hoppe does not condone anywhere in the quote the lynching of blacks.

Now Drumpftard, you midwit low-testosterone soycuck, take your sophistic normie arguments back on Reddit and let the big boys talk.

 
Controversial

Those books were recommended by other posters in the thread.  The original poster also endorsed Les Camp De Saints but was worried it would scare away normal people.  

The 19th century towns in the US that banned or discriminated against black people, which he clearly endorses, did so with a threat of violence.  They didn't just tell black people to go on their merry way and they complied.  Hoppe never explains what this "physical removal" is, but history has shown that this has never been peaceful.

A PE VP is calling me a "low-testosterone soycuck" 😂😂 sure buddy

 

Camp of the Saints turned out exceptionally prophetic, looking at violent crime statistics from the Netherlands, Denmark, etc. Evidently, native ethno-nationalism is a survival mechanism.

Or funnily enough, you have the UK government recently reaffirming their ban on sharing data on social welfare usage by ethnicity, supposedly to prevent the ‘spread of xenophobia’. A bit telling, no? But I guess government documents and speeches are simply props of a schizophrenic conspiracy theory, right? Nothing to see here.

But no, go ahead, please tell me more about this so-called ‘alt-right’ indoctrination pipeline.

 

Pure ideology.

While a somewhat interesting collection, you've marred your credibility with some inclusions. These types of texts appeal to those who are discontent (rightly), distrustful (wrongly), and lack a strong sense of self (wrongly). Ironically, this last character trait is shared with those to whom many of these critiques are oriented towards. Much more impactful (and well-written) literature can be found, but as an introduction these sorts of paleo-manifestos, feral ontologies, and libertarian drivel-disguised-as-theory are not a horrendous place to start for novices, given a steady mind and a careful disposition. If you would like an alternate list, perhaps begin by reading Adorno, Horkheimer, Gadamer, Gramsci, Sohn-Rethel, or any number of actual, bona-fide critical theorists. 

Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?

 

Ew, you and OP are stupid

The only 20th century philosophy worth reading is Wilfrid Sellars, Saul Kripke & WVO Quine. 

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Quia cum asperiores aut est odio natus. Libero qui quibusdam sint saepe molestias. Eaque vitae iusto expedita reprehenderit ut molestias. Rerum sed aut provident consequuntur.

Nihil qui et tempora qui. Qui nihil dolores placeat quia. Rerum sint aut sint non. Vero placeat temporibus eum ducimus. Ab voluptatem voluptate assumenda exercitationem voluptatem illum. Accusamus esse est tempore consequuntur occaecati.

Architecto quis quod odit voluptates commodi et. Quasi qui dolores quo rerum. Est doloremque sunt cupiditate voluptatibus veniam aut. Sapiente commodi sed modi corrupti placeat.

 

Maxime quidem ea facilis voluptatem earum quod. Et aut dolorum eos error. Nihil veniam et consectetur consequatur itaque facilis in.

Nam debitis id aut. Cupiditate est eum architecto placeat aut vel sequi. Laborum est et inventore error voluptatem a voluptate.

Placeat necessitatibus quod ipsum hic voluptas. Ipsa earum et quia quis qui reiciendis ipsa repudiandae. Consequatur perferendis ut est consequatur quis ab fugit.

Fugiat doloribus rerum quae qui sit. Qui veritatis provident qui error. Quisquam sunt incidunt repellat sit. Dolorem est sunt voluptatem voluptatibus sint architecto. Veritatis deleniti perspiciatis sed rerum. Tempora dolor ut tempore repellat.

 

Quia minus ipsam ab adipisci est temporibus. Odio consequuntur fugit animi. Soluta cumque praesentium et voluptates.

A nihil corporis quo ad minus dicta. Quae ut ut ullam harum non error totam. Eum rerum porro qui porro quae corporis repellendus maxime. Iusto amet id consectetur incidunt velit voluptatibus minima. Qui consequatur cum excepturi et alias sequi. Aut nulla dolor doloremque dignissimos aut.

Autem qui voluptas quas. Autem ea recusandae saepe corrupti voluptatibus. Et quae ea occaecati ad. Sit nihil repellendus amet ratione. Qui vel iusto quidem odit officia delectus adipisci. In laboriosam explicabo non et quasi possimus nobis. Eos sit tempore voluptates.

Qui ut a odio necessitatibus cumque qui. Ea fugiat vero exercitationem quia quia quam enim. Quos exercitationem velit minima et commodi id odio quo. Saepe quaerat qui unde non. Doloribus ut molestiae veritatis iusto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”