attractive girls who don't capitalize on their assets is like a rich guy holding cash during high inflation.

MonacoMonkey's picture
Rank: Neanderthal | banana points 2,218

I think it's a societal travesty that "morals" and "self dignity" prevent (the vast majority of) very attractive girls (think 5'10, skinny, perfectly symmetrical face, etc) from reaping the full compensation they deserve. I knew a few girls back in undergrad who were sugar babies. $1,000 for a few hours was apparently quite easy.

It's not unlike if a very rich man decided (stupidly) to hold cash in Argentine pesos. Losing return-generating potential with every passing day.

It's ironic I say this, because I'm super conservative (according to my peers). Staunch pro-life, against gay marriage, anti-LGBT, etc etc.

But I think using subtle social pressures to deny/shame a person('s right) to their full potential is a shame.

Discuss.

Comments (28)

Feb 24, 2018

Most probably aren't smart enough to see their own potential to capitalize anyways

    • 1
    • 1
Feb 24, 2018

Why are you anti-LGBT? Why can I not pork a gay dude in the behind after a long day of work? I think all the rainbow shit is stupid too, but look man, I like porking gay dudes in the behind. All that rainbow parading doesn't represent the majority of us homos either. There's a percent of any demographic that makes the rest look shitty, but look man, I like porking gay dudes in the behind. And I'm gonna keep doing it, do you want the entire world to hate me for that or what you pussy?

    • 8
Best Response
Feb 24, 2018
Tourettes God:

Why are you anti-LGBT? Why can I not pork a gay dude in the behind after a long day of work? I think all the rainbow shit is stupid too, but look man, I like porking gay dudes in the behind. All that rainbow parading doesn't represent the majority of us homos either. There's a percent of any demographic that makes the rest look shitty, but look man, I like porking gay dudes in the behind. And I'm gonna keep doing it, do you want the entire world to hate me for that or what you pussy?

OP -- Why do you have a problem with this man porking gay dude's butts?

    • 13
Feb 25, 2018

OP pork my behind plz ;)

    • 1
Feb 24, 2018

Being "anti-LGBT" is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard. Same for anti-gay marriage tbh, but no point in going down that route.

The idea of being offended by something other people do that doesn't concern or affect anyone or anything besides the ones actually doing it is just idiotic, if you actually think about it.

    • 2
Learn More

Side-by-side comparison of top modeling training courses + exclusive discount through WSO here.

Feb 24, 2018

I'm gonna jerk OP off until he accepts LGBT as the master race. We are coming for his job, we are coming for his family tradition, we are coming for his country's economy. That's what he gets for being a faggot.

    • 7
    • 1
Feb 24, 2018
MonacoMonkey:

I think it's a societal travesty that "morals" and "self dignity" prevent (the vast majority of) very attractive girls (think 5'10, skinny, perfectly symmetrical face, etc) from reaping the full compensation they deserve. I knew a few girls back in undergrad who were sugar babies. $1,000 for a few hours was apparently quite easy.

It's not unlike if a very rich man decided (stupidly) to hold cash in Argentine pesos. Losing return-generating potential with every passing day.

It's ironic I say this, because I'm super conservative (according to my peers). Staunch pro-life, against gay marriage, anti-LGBT, etc etc.

But I think using subtle social pressures to deny/shame a person('s right) to their full potential is a shame.

Discuss.

What exactly do you consider an asset on a girl?

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee

    • 1
    • 2
Mar 10, 2018
Isaiah_53_5:
MonacoMonkey:

I think it's a societal travesty that "morals" and "self dignity" prevent (the vast majority of) very attractive girls (think 5'10, skinny, perfectly symmetrical face, etc) from reaping the full compensation they deserve. I knew a few girls back in undergrad who were sugar babies. $1,000 for a few hours was apparently quite easy.

It's not unlike if a very rich man decided (stupidly) to hold cash in Argentine pesos. Losing return-generating potential with every passing day.

It's ironic I say this, because I'm super conservative (according to my peers). Staunch pro-life, against gay marriage, anti-LGBT, etc etc.

But I think using subtle social pressures to deny/shame a person('s right) to their full potential is a shame.

Discuss.

What exactly do you consider an asset on a girl?

A nice pair of t-dogs and a couple o' holes.

Learn More

Side-by-side comparison of top modeling training courses + exclusive discount through WSO here.

Feb 24, 2018

There is something off in this pro-life and view of women. You're either going to be one of two things in 10 years:

  • Pro-life, respect person for inner being
  • Pro-choice, high school girls always stay the same age

alright alright alright

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee

    • 1
    • 4
Feb 24, 2018

To OPs points about being staunch (lol) conservative--I don't understand why people are anti-gay marriage/anti-LGBT. Why does it bother you that others live the way they do? Never could wrap my head around that. The whole pro-life thing also boggles my mind sometimes, how does it affect YOU that someone else decides not to have a baby? If these conservatives truly value life then why do the same group of people complain about Medicaid which gives access to health-care to those less fortunate? Y'know, maybe if that mother had an abortion instead of giving birth to a child with a poverty income, she wouldn't need Medicaid for her kid(s).

    • 3
Feb 24, 2018

You misunderstand pro-life, abortion=murder. They're concerned about the baby in the same way they're concerned about people not getting killed on the streets.

"This world, it is a tempest sometimes. But remember, the sun always rises again."
-- Brandon Sanderson

    • 1
Mar 7, 2018

because it's unnatural. and there's a reason why, in primitive societies, homosexuals get thrown (hands tied) off rooftops.

before you minimize "primitive" societies, let us not forget that you and I (we all) are offspring of tens of thousands of years of such societies.

so obviously, something's been working.

you could even make a futurism argument, in that, our "progressive" society (of the past 100 years or so) is leading us to extincting. but that's a whole other argument.

my point is, let nature take it's course. don't try to socially legitimize something that isn't naturally legitimate/beneficial just because it "feels morally right" to do so.

    • 5
Mar 7, 2018

You realize homosexuality is recorded in most animal species, right? You know that it isn't exclusive to humans, yes? And surely you know homosexuality isn't a choice - it's genetic and more importantly, it's ridiculous to think that just because someone is gay, that means humans will end up extinct. Regardless of whether or not it is accepted in a society, if someone is gay, they are most likely not going to marry and have children with a woman anyway, so why would the past 50,000 years of humans doing quite fine while having homosexuals change in a mere 100 years?

Your primitive society argument is completely ridiculous. Many primitive societies that still exist today believe in and perform female genital mutilation - are you saying we shouldn't discount FGM because women feeling pleasure from sex is totally unnatural, as many primitive societies believe in it? Or pillaging rival societies and then raping the women and killing their children is okay too then?

Or do you prefer having more of a cafeteria style acts of primitive society in our society, where it benefits your viewpoints?

    • 4
Feb 24, 2018

What prostitutes are really 5'10 with banging looks? If she had it like that, she'd go and model for some company that would die to have that lottery of good looks to showcase. It's the same thing: selling your youth and innocence for dollars. One is much more dignified and fulfilling than the other.

Feb 25, 2018
MonacoMonkey:

It's ironic I say this, because I'm super conservative (according to my peers). Staunch pro-life, against gay marriage, anti-LGBT, etc etc.

MonacoMonkey:

But I think using subtle social pressures to deny/shame a person('s right) to their full potential is a shame.

How hypocrite can you be?

On the topic however, there are a lot more pretty girls with no money than there are rich older dudes looking for pretty girls with no money - most wealthy guys also have a stable family and a nice average looking wife who they get along with on a personal level.
Older guys also won't take you seriously and have more power over you than you have over them, the other way around are definitely exceptions.

You also may be getting some nice cash but your social value decreases. As a college student myself, I wouldn't be interested in a girl who does stuff like that - I don't have anything against it but I just wouldn't want her to be my girlfriend.

On the long term you'll be much better off by trying to find a quality boyfriend.

Feb 25, 2018

It's really about your preference and morals as a person. It's like saying that as long as you're a hot guy, you should be out there mixing with cougars and become a boy toy or you're not utilizing your abilities. It's simply not for everyone.

Feb 25, 2018

"It's ironic that I'm a conservative" - no it's not. You sound exactly like a conservative. The only thing true about conservatives is hypocritical self-serving actions under the guise of "morals". Makes perfect sense you'd say this.

    • 2
Feb 25, 2018

But to answer your question let me explain: It's hard to believe but women are actually humans too gasp. I know. Shocking. Who would have guessed that women aren't assets? Now based on this mind-blowing premise that women have similar feelings/emotions and are as conscious and as full humans as men are, (not actually plastic fembots- I know, Austin powers tricked you) ask yourself how you would feel if you chose to "capitalize on your assets" by servicing rich gay men who had particular appetites. Not up for it? Maybe it won't make you feel super good about yourself? So, we arrive at the conclusion that women actually don't enjoy this type of transaction and it makes them feel bad. People with low emotional intelligence and empathy, including those with anti-social personality disorder, have a hard time understanding the emotions of others. May want to get yourself checked out.

    • 5
Feb 25, 2018

I'm also going to go out on a huge limb and assume there is a rational brain somewhere in there and spell this out in a simple fashion using maslows hierarchy of needs:

First need: food, water, shelter <- this is where basic income is important
Second: relationships, friends, support, family <- very important and being a prostitution tends to interfere with mutually supportive romantic relationships. This is why prostitutes are usually quite poor, they are doing this to support the first tier need.
Third need: achievement <- now this is where your saying "full potential". Since prostitution interferes with a higher priority need (healthy living relationships) it's not rational to sacrifice a higher tier need for a lower tier need so women don't engage in this behaviour.
Fourth need: self-actualization <- not relevant to the argument.

Hope this helps answer your question.