24 Comments
 

I would be interested in knowing this as well.  Anyone have any insights on Citi?  Either from personal experience or from what you've heard, all comments would be greatly appreciated

 

I had the 2nd round (final) since my resume was passed by an MD.

Very technical - 2 30min interviews with an Analyst and Associate- expect all your normal tech questions, DCF, multiples, random valutation questions, some LBO stuff, some bonds (caught me by surprise).

Overall if you prepare well  you should be fine. I studied my corp fin class notes, vault guide and stuff like that. Definitly the most technical interview I had (compared to GS, UBS, JPM and Lazard).

 

Asked me about DCF and accretion/dilution (on my resume). Also asked about comps. Pretty standard stuff but the first time I got the accretion/dilution question.

Behavioral part was very standard and about fit. They started asking about my schedule towards the end of the interview (specifically if I had any other superdays on the next Friday).

Called me back the next morning for a superday.

 
Best Response

A merger can either be accretive or dilutive. A merger is accretive when the acquiring company's earnings per share will increase after the merger and vice versa. Say a shoe company, BIg Gun wants to acquire a fast growing competitor, Ubershoe. Also suppose that Big Gun's earnings are $10 million, that it has 1 million outstanding shares (making it have an EPS of $10), and that Ubershoe's earnings are 2 million. Whether the acquisition will be accretive or dilutive depends on the amount BIg Gun will pay for Ubershoe. Say that BIg Gun agrees to a stock swap in which it issues 500k shares which it will trade for all of Ubershoe's shares. The combined company will have 1.5 million shares and 12 million in earnings. The new EPS will thus be $8 per share, making it dilutive to Big Gun's earnings.

Now let's change the scenario, lets' say that BIg Gun agrees to issue 100,000 new shares of stock instead of 500,000. The combined company will have $12 mm in earnings and 1.1 million shares, or an EPS of $10.91. This deal is accretive.

Using P/E Ratios----

When a company with a higher price to earnings ratios (let's say Company 1 and it's PE ratio PE1) acquires a firm, (Company 2 and it's PE ratio is PE2) which has a lower PE ratio, it is an accretive merger.

So if PE1 > PE2 the merger is accretive. if PE1 PE2 the merger is dilutive. The reason for this is that the acquiring company will pay less per dollar of earnings to acquire the target.

Models_and_bottles: Would you be willing to explain how exactly earnings might be affected and what addbacks might occur?

 

Ya..I had them for SA last year. Very technical. One VP even gave me a sheet of paper and made me do DCF right in front of him. It was my most technical interview. Also interviewed with all of the BBs.

 

To maximize returns, you'd obviously want the least amount of equity as possible, so I would've said something like making projections of how much debt they could feasibly handle based on their free cash flow. This would obviously vary from company to company.

 
 

do they ask hardcore technical questions even if you've never taken advanced finance courses/have experience in finance?

 

Fugiat aliquid et voluptatibus atque perspiciatis atque. Et vel ipsum aperiam ullam a. Quo rerum minima quas quae. Qui est fugiat quod quas.

Tempora ut autem est omnis. Vel explicabo repudiandae quos quia repellendus nihil. Nihil enim aliquam ut aut corrupti aperiam assumenda. Et et est ut magnam nihil. Enim sit officia incidunt doloremque eos dolorem repellendus error.

Maiores reprehenderit fuga vero nulla. Ut voluptas non tempora dolore numquam architecto. Quis fuga quo et commodi. Id neque quo sunt enim.

 

Delectus natus aspernatur ut quia rerum harum. Dolores eum qui doloribus quidem corporis et. Provident fugiat rerum libero excepturi commodi a vel.

Occaecati fugit nesciunt libero exercitationem expedita. Sed facilis qui sed. Tempore accusantium dolores sit sunt. Et magni dolor facilis nihil nulla molestiae. Sed culpa architecto quasi distinctio odio. Eaque facilis nostrum ut inventore.

Nemo possimus occaecati est unde vel accusantium aliquam saepe. Facilis asperiores qui est illum. Maxime placeat eligendi eum sapiente consectetur temporibus velit.

Consequatur qui dolorem incidunt sint voluptas ut earum. Id necessitatibus veniam rerum alias et corporis. Consequatur soluta perspiciatis dolores veniam incidunt ut rerum quia. Est mollitia quia qui veniam sed vitae velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”