Equity comp at PE portfolio companies

I’ve noticed that WSO has an enormous amount of content on PE carry but limited information on equity compensation for the underlying portfolio companies and their management teams. I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of two PE-backed portco exits, so I’d like to share what I’ve seen and then open it up for others to share any info or experiences.

For those that don’t know, PE groups typically create a pool of equity in new platform investments that they provide to management teams to incentive performance. The amount of equity is typically around 10%, and this can go up or down a few percentage points based on the size of the deal (smaller deals will get larger equity pools and vice versa). 

The allocation of the pool varies from deal to deal, but usually the largest chunk is given to CEO, next chunks to COO, CFO, CDO, and remaining chunks to key SVPs and VPs. Some companies choose to keep equity only with the most senior executives while others spread it down even to the manager or associate level, especially for corporate development roles that can help directly impact growth. In a typical 10% equity pool situation, I’d estimate the allocation to be 4% CEO, 1.5% each to COO/CFO/CDO, and the remaining to key SVPs and VPs in corp dev and ops, give or take 1% in each example.

Vesting is typically based on a combination of time and performance, with performance often being based on MOIC at exit. PE firms tend to push for a larger percentage to be based on performance with higher hurdles, while management teams push for a higher percentage to be based on time with lower MOIC hurdles. Based on my experience and what I’ve heard from others, market is 50/50 split between time and performance, with full vesting received at 5 years and 3x MOIC. I’ve heard of some firms pushing full performance vesting on naive management teams at 4x or even 5x with no time component, which is crazy and not something you want to agree to.

An example in action - let’s say you joined a $25M EBITDA company and grew it to $100M.  The company sold for 10x ($1B) and had 6x leverage, so equity of $400M. The PE group put in $125M so they had a gross MOIC of 3.2x. In our typical example from above the management team would have hit their performance hurdle so they’d be fully vested and receive 10% equity, or $40M. If you were the CFO, you would receive $6M in equity compensation (notwithstanding any rollover or co-investment). Woo hoo!

Now if the company was purchased by another PE group, you’d have the opportunity (and expectation...) to rollover a chunk of this (~50% give or take) to double down and get a second bite of the apple on the next investment. Do this 2-3 times in your career and you can make some serious coin.

Happy to answer any questions and would love to hear what others have seen in their experience. 




 

vandrunk95

Do the equity pools usually get to participate in the total equity sale $ or only after investors capital has been returned?

Yes - there’s typically an ABC waterfall where the A tranche is the majority investors, B tranche is management rollover, and C tranche is new management equity. I think it’s fair for those that put in real money to get that money back before management receives any equity bonus. The one thing you need to watch out for is the performance hurdles. If you need to hit a 5x return before fully vesting that’s no bueno.

 

Interesting to hear your perspective. At my PE firm, mgmt. equity is the same as our equity. This is used as a point of differentiation from other PE firms, and is very well received by sell-side advisers and their clients. Something I learned recently that I didn't realize is that when the mgmt. options vest, they are instantly diluted. So if the option pool is 10%, and we have 100 shares, 10 shares vest for mgmt, they now own 10 shares out of 110, or 9%. Kind of misleading in my opinion.

Other than that, other differences between how your firm and my firm operate is that we always give the CFO more than the other non-CEO execs. Our MOIC hurdles also seem to be higher, I don't think we have many (if any) option plans that fully vest at 3x, but we are on the lower end of the MM so a 3x+ is a bit more achievable. We usually do 25% time/75% performance.    

 

Thanks for the explanation. I'm currently experiencing it first hand working for an ultra LMM company and while I understand the reasons for putting an option pool in place I'm realizing it's not very enticing in this situation.

 

StrategyJunkie

Do you mind sharing your rough numbers (annual comp and sale proceeds)? Also would be interested what level you are (years of experience, etc.). I'm at a PE firm now but have always thought about jumping to the portco level for operational experience. 

Sure - annual cash comp roughly between $300-450k (varies based on role, company size, location). Sale proceeds of $1-3M give or take each exit (again this will vary). I’m in my mid-thirties and left IB to go to corporate side.

 

coffee21

Would you be able to share about how you became part of the first PE portco exit you were involved with? 

Sure - was burned out on IB so looked for an exit. Found a VP or corp dev opening in the industry I covered. PE sponsor had just come in and needed someone to create and execute the M&A growth plan. This was essentially a roll-up play so I just worked my ass off to scoop up smaller players in our space to grow. Worked very well.

 

can you elaborate a bit on the rollup life? i'm at a midcap tech company that has M&A as a key growth lever - so buying a lot of P&L, and to a lesser extent product. i started a few years ago when we were PE backed, then helped take the company public. although i'm generally happy in my role, i'm also beginning to think through what next steps might look like. never worked in IB, but have had plenty of deal reps and can run a deal myself more or less.

one thing i'm considering is moving to a bigger company with a larger team. might be a grass is greener lens, but thinking that bigger team with more resources and staff would be nice. more regular hours, a little less fire drills / having to jump onto random, non M&A projects as the corporate SWAT team. maybe get a bit more branding, looking at bigger / more complex deals (though i've bought stuff $500m+ at this point).

on the other hand, recruiters have also mentioned some opportunities to run deals at PE-backed portcos, mostly in the LMM - MM space. have looked at some healthcare ones, insurance/benefits, and other things (including one or two in my own industry). nothing that's really piqued my interest, so far. would effectively be the deal guy with the sponsor and/or an executive focusing a little more on the actual sourcing. been less interested in this path but would love to hear from someone who has lived it.

 

Would say that CEO equity tends to be a bit higher and everyone else's a bit lower than you've described. My package looks decently similar to what's described for non-CEOs. ~15% total equity pool. I've got 0.5%. 70% performance and 30% time based with targets at 2x for half and 3x for the other half on performance. Some performance ratchets up to 1% for hitting certain ridiculous metrics within defined period, but the COVID bump got me nearly all the way there. The PE firm has us marked at 2.4x on a pretty weak exit multiple, so hopefully real outcome is better.

 

Yiggyyaller, I appreciate your response here and also reading through your post history, lots of value add. Just wondering how you have seen other people get into situations like yourself. It seems like you had a good relationship with your PE firm when you worked there and that opened the door for your job now. Just trying to size up how someone would go from a large corporate CD role into a role similar to yours one day. I'm assuming the no brainer answer is going to be along the lines of networking. But given you have a long post history with some fairly thoughtful responses just wanted to see what else you might throw out.

 

This is probably obvious to you, but there is no one path to the C-suite at a PE-backed PortCo. Being an associate up for promotion and choosing to go to a PortCo is probably one of the rarer paths. More commonly I'll see long-time consultants (12-15+ years experience) jump to a VP level role and grow into a C-suite level role or someone take 15-20 years working through various companies to get there. 

Someone at a large corporate CD should be looking to get large responsibility and title bumps by going down-market a bit. Maybe you are a manager today, but you can get the bump to Director / Head of Corp Dev at a mid-market company. Or if you don't feel ready to run your own deals, try taking a more senior role at one of the big roll-up oriented PubCos (Constellation Software, Roper, etc. for whatever industry you are in) and apprentice to someone doing the end-to-end work for a few years before making the jump. For someone like you, it comes down to how ready you feel / your skillset to succeed on a platform. It depends on how much you think you can source, manage and execute deals completely by yourself. Can you be the point person for the relationship with the target CEO, manage the advisors/lawyers/accountants, and everything in between to get the deal to the finish line? In both banking and PE, I had good mentors holding my hand through learning every stage of the deal process and every skill you need to succeed in each stage (pipeline building, thesis generation, etc.). 

There's also a certain stage of startup (mostly in tech but also in parts of consumer, healthcare and financial services) where the CD skillset is also pretty valuable in that and I've found people do not need to be quite as buttoned-up on deal making ability and can succeed. You are growing with your company and maybe only doing small tuck-ins or managing de novos but getting the broad exposure you need to eventually succeed. I would say these opportunities have a lower barrier to entry, lower payoff, but can be a better place to start.

I also have 0 context for how senior you are. If you are an analyst, I'd say you probably have a lot of work to do and need to move down-market quickly to get the responsibility to learn these skills. Otherwise you'll just never see enough of the process because other folks internally handle it for you. Ultimately you need to put yourself in the right situation to be highly acquisitive, working with smart people who can teach you and also light a fire under your ass to build the broad skillset needed to succeed.

 

One additional question for this very helpful thread:

Am looking now at a role at a PE-backed portfolio company. EV of probably $500 - $750 million. They are looking at me for a Director, M&A position. I have about 6 years of banking experience.

Any ballpark for what I should be expecting from a compensation standpoint, both cash as well as what may be reasonable to target from an incentive pool?

 

Is this EV at entry, current, or expected exit? Depends how acquisitive they plan to be and the type of deals they'll do.

I'd expect something high 100's to mid 200's cash comp (higher/lower depending on base vs bonus) a year, maybe 500k-1m of profit sharing units. Value of units completely dependent on exit, obviously.

Also prepare to wear lots of hats.

 

This comp sounds right to me but equity piece might be a little rich depending on the team structure - I.e. if you are one of 3-4 Directors, there’s a VP or two, and a Chief Dev Officer, you’re probably not getting that much.

 

Curious to hear your thoughts around CorpDev at a PE-backed company vs. a more traditional company across hours, compensation, and growth opportunities. I imagine that CorpDev at PE-backed companies tend to be more tuck-in focused, higher velocity and volume with generally higher compensation relative to a traditional corporate company, but wanted to hear your thoughts around this.  

Am considering a move from IB to CorpDev and PE-backed CorpDev roles seem enticing, but don't want to join a role that  involves working 70-80 hour weeks when I can stay in banking and make 50-100% more. 

 

I can only speak to PE-backed corp dev roles, but I’ve never worked a 70 hour week. My weeks are always 40-50 hours max. A big reason for this is less busy work like in IB. We’re either working on active deals or trying to source new deals. Either way, there’s no reason to stay up all night working. 

 
Steff McKee

I can only speak to PE-backed corp dev roles, but I've never worked a 70 hour week. My weeks are always 40-50 hours max. A big reason for this is less busy work like in IB. We're either working on active deals or trying to source new deals. Either way, there's no reason to stay up all night working. 

Isn’t “working on active deals or trying to source new deals”….exactly what IB also does?

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 

Thanks for sharing. I recently left IB to join a PE-backed company in a senior role (right below the VP level). I was disappointed to learn that we have a policy that only VPs and up receive equity, but the cash comp and opportunity was good so I took it. I've been wondering whether that's something I should push for but it sounds like that's a pretty standard policy across the board.

IMO - high performers that also work hard should always work for equity. It's hard to shake the IB work ethic so might as well be working for upside.

 

I'm interviewing for a VP Finance role at a PE-backed consumer retail company and have been reading articles across the internet all week to learn about private company compensation. Your post, as short it is, has been THE most helpful. Thank you. Couple questions for the audience:

- The recruiter told me that equity is reserved for the C-suite but that they may be able to fashion phantom stock. Is this something to consider or should I really be demanding equity? I've done BB IBD M&A as an analyst & public company corp. finance, but never went the PE route.

- What elements are negotiable and which are fixed by the PE company? E.g. Can I negotiate time vs. performance or any of the hurdles? Or are those elements set company wide. 

- Is it appropriate to ask for their valuation model during the recruiting process to understand out how much the PE company paid, debt multiple, forecast, valuation scenarios etc.

- I assume the %'s you referenced above could be reduced if the company needs more investment and you get diluted? Or it just makes the MOIC hurdle harder to achieve and therefore you don't need to worry about recalculating ownership %.

- Based on their ownership %'s (i.e. the 10% pool), is management entitled to cash flow distributions the way a PE owner might take a cash dividend? Or is management equity considered a different class and therefore not entitled to those dividends.

- If you leave the company, do you retain your vested (time-based or performance-based) equity?

Thanks in advance.

 
Most Helpful

Current a PE portco exec with equity. To answer your questions:

  • At our portco, we give equity to C-suite, SVPs, VPs, and two of our valuable Directors. About $800M EV. They can always offer it to others as needed, so push for this if you think you have leverage.
  • Usually, all employees sign the same agreement on vesting terms. Only thing to negotiate is amount.
  • I think its very fair to where your stock options were last valued so you can do the back of envelope math to estimate the future value of your shares - they won't send you the valuation model. The days of massive multiple arbitrage are over, so lower ROICs impact your management shares as well (make sure you get more shares!)
  • Any money in the door will probably reduce EqV of existing ownership (absent a high ROIC on a new project/acquisition)- I wouldnt try to figure out the specifics because its a bit of a gray area until you exit unless your firm has management equity share valuation software which automatically shows you the current value of your shares (this exists but isn't common)
  • Depends on your cap table, but most Mgmt Equity is Class B or C, and dividends usually pay out to Class A. I would not expect to receive any proceeds from Management shares until exit. However, those distributions count in your favor when tabulating the MOIC/IRR for Class A shares, and what $$ waterfalls down to Class B and C at exit.
  • YMMV, but traditionally, you will vest over time (20% a year). A portion of your equity will be tied to time, and a portion to performance hurdles. If exit occurs before the implied hold period (in this case 5 years), time vesting accelerates. Example:
    • You're awarded $1,000,000 in Class C shares, vesting over 5 years. Half your shares vest on performance - 50% once you hit 2.5x MOIC, and the other 50% once you exceed 3.0x MOIC
    • You leave the company after 2 years (40% vested)
    • The company exits 2 years later and achieves 2.9x MOIC.
    • You receive 50% of the performance bucket * 40% time vested = 20% of this total bucket + 40% of the time vested bucket = 30% of your initial $1M in grants
    • You have to "pay back" the $300,000 you were granted, and get to keep the 1.9x of value appreciation. 1.9x $300,000 = $570K in your pocket for 2 years of work.
"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 

Saepe ea ut ducimus placeat qui. Accusantium molestiae quia et sunt non fuga. Nostrum et hic in esse tempore. Vel eum explicabo doloribus ut illo. Accusamus natus et neque laborum ducimus unde. Saepe velit quis nesciunt. Similique sit reiciendis enim doloremque vel iusto ab laborum.

Amet nam error optio. Nemo voluptatem quaerat consectetur nostrum nulla dicta.

Non quia voluptas ut sed. Expedita nisi excepturi omnis deleniti quia id. Nobis sint voluptatum iusto consequatur veritatis quos. Enim maxime optio fugit est minus soluta quia.

Optio possimus ipsum totam fugit. Nemo aut eius maxime in non. Quia culpa illum earum dolorem. Nesciunt nisi hic molestias cupiditate voluptas est eaque.

 

Consequatur quo ut unde accusamus. Quam voluptatem blanditiis eaque voluptates et sunt quo sint. Dolores expedita fugit quis aut.

Modi eveniet quasi eos enim. Omnis deserunt aut at quae amet nihil.

Consequatur sequi eos dolores qui velit. Qui modi nam vel sapiente ut. Sint ad nihil enim laborum voluptatum. Et voluptatem deleniti sequi sit quos. Odit doloribus sunt excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”