Evercore vs. Citi

Hey all. I just got notified of 2 offers I have for a summer analyst position at Citi and Evercore. Which would you guys take for a summer analyst role? Obviously, summer analyst leads to FT offer, so this is almost like deciding where to go for FT. Which one has better exit opps after banking? Which one would you guys choose?

 
LeoMessi:
Who started this rumor that the elite boutiques have fantastic exit opps? Other than Lazard and Blackstone, most of the boutiques have much weaker exit opps because they much prefer to internally grow their talent. A lot of guys who go to boutiques stay there for the long haul, and thus the exit opps often don't match the bank's reputation.

Mm hmm, Moelis LA had 3 to TPG and one to Silverlake out of 6 analysts. I'm pretty sure no group from a BB, and definitely not any groups outside of top GS/MS, placed better than that.

 
LeoMessi:
Who started this rumor that the elite boutiques have fantastic exit opps?.

I personally know evercore 2nd years with megafund offers lined up. As mentioned, places like blackstone, lazard and moelis do extremely well also.

If you're interested in moving to the buyside, take evercore. If you are interested in potentially becoming a career banker, maybe take citi.

 
LeoMessi:
Moelis might be a counterexample. I don't know anything about them, outside of my limited interaction with their NY group, which left me thoroughly unimpressed. I do understand that Moelis LA is a de facto UBS LA group, so perhaps that explains their placement.

I wouldn't be surprised if those placements only describe the first 1-2 years of Moelis LA placement, however, when all the analysts were ex-UBS LA analysts. I'd be curious to know which class placed that well, since that is indeed pretty impressive.

This is right now, as in this is what the current 2nd year analysts have gotten.

 
LeoMessi:
Moelis might be a counterexample. I don't know anything about them, outside of my limited interaction with their NY group, which left me thoroughly unimpressed. I do understand that Moelis LA is a de facto UBS LA group, so perhaps that explains their placement.

I wouldn't be surprised if those placements only describe the first 1-2 years of Moelis LA placement, however, when all the analysts were ex-UBS LA analysts. I'd be curious to know which class placed that well, since that is indeed pretty impressive.

The top Moelis guys have been out of UBS LA long enough that current analysts never saw them, so in theory it's a non factor...

 

As the only WSO certified member posting here, go with Evercore for the guaranteed M&A experience.

Citi has great M&A group, but there's no guarantee that you get placed into it.

Always choose M&A over a BB coverage group.

You won't get good modeling experience in a coverage/industry role unless the industry group runs its own M&A, which is only the case at Goldman.

 
squawkbox:
As the only WSO certified member posting here, go with Evercore for the guaranteed M&A experience.

Citi has great M&A group, but there's no guarantee that you get placed into it.

Always choose M&A over a BB coverage group.

You won't get good modeling experience in a coverage/industry role unless the industry group runs its own M&A, which is only the case at Goldman.

This isn't completely true... there are lots of industry groups at other shops that run their own M&A. My group for example does all its modeling within the coverage group. Our M&A team only sends us supplementary pages on WACC Analysis and other random bs, but there are definitely industry groups at other banks that operate on the Goldman model and keep all M&A in group.

 
rufiolove:
squawkbox:
As the only WSO certified member posting here, go with Evercore for the guaranteed M&A experience.

Citi has great M&A group, but there's no guarantee that you get placed into it.

Always choose M&A over a BB coverage group.

You won't get good modeling experience in a coverage/industry role unless the industry group runs its own M&A, which is only the case at Goldman.

This isn't completely true... there are lots of industry groups at other shops that run their own M&A. My group for example does all its modeling within the coverage group. Our M&A team only sends us supplementary pages on WACC Analysis and other random bs, but there are definitely industry groups at other banks that operate on the Goldman model and keep all M&A in group.

Ok, but would you agree that it is the exception, not the rule?

Even then, if you're lead left on an IPO, it's going to be tough for you to be staffed on buyside M&A projects with tight timelines. It happens, but it's the exception IMO.

 

blackstone places better than the other top boutiques and GS/MS. where does wso get the idea that lazard places extremely well? from what i've seen their analysts did not do very well this year (a few well known funds out of a 25 person class)

 
Best Response

Not sure where this rumor is coming from to always take the BB offer. I am an incoming analyst at Moelis LA / Blackstone Restructuring / Lazard, have friends at the other two and can attest to the great exit opportunities at all three.

Moelis as a whole has still been having amazing analyst placement. The LA office is still placing 50-75% in megafunds (which is unheard of at most BB's) and New York has been sending the analysts to a lot of great shops (Apollo, TPG SSG, Centerbridge, etc.) with 100% placement into PE/HF.

Blackstone is sending analysts wherever the analysts want to go, and that is usually BX PE (as long as they perform) or another megafund, sometimes Apollo/Warburg Pincus/Advent, etc. M&A and Restructuring both place phenomenally. The hours are also pretty nice.

Lazard is Lazard. The oldest and most established pure advisory shop in the world. Hours are group dependent, but the only group with good hours (for bankers) is the generalist banking program. Exit opps are good, sending a handful to megafunds and the rest to upper tier middle market shops. The analyst class is largest out of the three at 25, but still a quarter of the size of a bulge bracket firm.

I do not know anyone at Evercore, but I would make the assumption that it would probably place like MoCo/BX/LAZ. Culture and hours are different at each firm. Boutiques are taking market share and associate PE spots away from bulge brackets.

 
Duke4Lyfe:
Not sure where this rumor is coming from to always take the BB offer. I am an incoming analyst at Moelis LA / Blackstone Restructuring / Lazard, have friends at the other two and can attest to the great exit opportunities at all three.

Moelis as a whole has still been having amazing analyst placement. The LA office is still placing 50-75% in megafunds (which is unheard of at most BB's) and New York has been sending the analysts to a lot of great shops (Apollo, TPG SSG, Centerbridge, etc.) with 100% placement into PE/HF.

Blackstone is sending analysts wherever the analysts want to go, and that is usually BX PE (as long as they perform) or another megafund, sometimes Apollo/Warburg Pincus/Advent, etc. M&A and Restructuring both place phenomenally. The hours are also pretty nice.

Lazard is Lazard. The oldest and most established pure advisory shop in the world. Hours are group dependent, but the only group with good hours (for bankers) is the generalist banking program. Exit opps are good, sending a handful to megafunds and the rest to upper tier middle market shops. The analyst class is largest out of the three at 25, but still a quarter of the size of a bulge bracket firm.

I do not know anyone at Evercore, but I would make the assumption that it would probably place like MoCo/BX/LAZ. Culture and hours are different at each firm. Boutiques are taking market share and associate PE spots away from bulge brackets.

This is spot on. Admin please make user certified.

 

First of all, congrats! Two great offers that would make a ton of people jealous. In terms of exit opps to PE/HF, boutiques can be a struggle sometimes. As mentioned before, these places are often focused on internal promotes. Exit opps to tier 2 buyside are common, but placement into tier 1 megafunds are rarer. However, EVR M&A is one of the better places to be for that purpose. EVR has done very well recently.

Evercore M&A analysts get placed decently well, occasionally at some megafunds too, but honestly, I think BBs are gonna heat up vs. boutiques as we get farther from the 2008 crisis. The days of places like Evercore, Moelis, Perella, Centerview killing it might be over, but I could be wrong. Especially since these places often tend to be one-man or two-man shows. Moelis analysts don't get placed as well anymore, while two years ago they were hot-shots, and Evercore's analyst program is getting bigger from what I hear, diluting deal experience opportunities. Again, this is just what I've heard, ask around.

Now if this were GS/JPM/MS, I would recommend BB, but Citi is on the fence vs. pure-play M&A at Evercore. Live M&A is fun vs. ECM/DCM, or worse, pitching. I'd probably lean towards Evercore unless you get the top groups at Citi. Stay away from Citi's product groups except M&A if you can. Two guys I know from Citi industry coverage got placed into megafunds, but also had top-notch undergrad.

 
bulldogs12:
First of all, congrats! Two great offers that would make a ton of people jealous. In terms of exit opps to PE/HF, boutiques can be a struggle sometimes. As mentioned before, these places are often focused on internal promotes. Exit opps to tier 2 buyside are common, but placement into tier 1 megafunds are rarer. However, EVR M&A is one of the better places to be for that purpose. EVR has done very well recently.

Evercore M&A analysts get placed decently well, occasionally at some megafunds too, but honestly, I think BBs are gonna heat up vs. boutiques as we get farther from the 2008 crisis. The days of places like Evercore, Moelis, Perella, Centerview killing it might be over, but I could be wrong. Especially since these places often tend to be one-man or two-man shows. Moelis analysts don't get placed as well anymore, while two years ago they were hot-shots, and Evercore's analyst program is getting bigger from what I hear, diluting deal experience opportunities. Again, this is just what I've heard, ask around.

Now if this were GS/JPM/MS, I would recommend BB, but Citi is on the fence vs. pure-play M&A at Evercore. Live M&A is fun vs. ECM/DCM, or worse, pitching. I'd probably lean towards Evercore unless you get the top groups at Citi. Stay away from Citi's product groups except M&A if you can. Two guys I know from Citi industry coverage got placed into megafunds, but also had top-notch undergrad.

Lot of strange comments in this post, I'd take with a grain of salt. Moelis LA analysts, as said in my previous post, absolutely killed it this past year. What changes in the market do you see having an impact on boutique vs BB in the next two years, especially considering how well boutiques have done in the past few years? Just a gut feeling from your wealth of experience browsing WSO?

Citi IBD doesn't have any real product groups other than M&A (you can argue FEG is a product, but they're really not), so I have no idea what you mean by product groups other than M&A. ECM/DCM is done by Citi's CMO team.

Live M&A is "fun" compared to ECM/DCM? Have you ever been on a live deal? Very exciting, but I wouldn't call it playing golf compared to pitchwork. Also, you should expect to do some pitchwork no matter which firm you join, including Evercore M&A (yes, M&A does pitchwork too sometimes).

 
goldman in da house:
bulldogs12:
First of all, congrats! Two great offers that would make a ton of people jealous. In terms of exit opps to PE/HF, boutiques can be a struggle sometimes. As mentioned before, these places are often focused on internal promotes. Exit opps to tier 2 buyside are common, but placement into tier 1 megafunds are rarer. However, EVR M&A is one of the better places to be for that purpose. EVR has done very well recently.

Evercore M&A analysts get placed decently well, occasionally at some megafunds too, but honestly, I think BBs are gonna heat up vs. boutiques as we get farther from the 2008 crisis. The days of places like Evercore, Moelis, Perella, Centerview killing it might be over, but I could be wrong. Especially since these places often tend to be one-man or two-man shows. Moelis analysts don't get placed as well anymore, while two years ago they were hot-shots, and Evercore's analyst program is getting bigger from what I hear, diluting deal experience opportunities. Again, this is just what I've heard, ask around.

Now if this were GS/JPM/MS, I would recommend BB, but Citi is on the fence vs. pure-play M&A at Evercore. Live M&A is fun vs. ECM/DCM, or worse, pitching. I'd probably lean towards Evercore unless you get the top groups at Citi. Stay away from Citi's product groups except M&A if you can. Two guys I know from Citi industry coverage got placed into megafunds, but also had top-notch undergrad.

Lot of strange comments in this post, I'd take with a grain of salt. Moelis LA analysts, as said in my previous post, absolutely killed it this past year. What changes in the market do you see having an impact on boutique vs BB in the next two years, especially considering how well boutiques have done in the past few years? Just a gut feeling from your wealth of experience browsing WSO?

Citi IBD doesn't have any real product groups other than M&A (you can argue FEG is a product, but they're really not), so I have no idea what you mean by product groups other than M&A. ECM/DCM is done by Citi's CMO team.

Live M&A is "fun" compared to ECM/DCM? Have you ever been on a live deal? Very exciting, but I wouldn't call it playing golf compared to pitchwork. Also, you should expect to do some pitchwork no matter which firm you join, including Evercore M&A (yes, M&A does pitchwork too sometimes).

Goldman is right... I didn't mean "fun" as in working in excel 120/hours a week during a live deal is enjoyable. No one in the right mind thinks that. To clarify, live M&A is more rewarding, in the sense that the result of your work can end up in the headlines. Getting a deal announced is a good feeling. If you don't feel that way, then getting through 2-3 years of IBD will be tough. You wanna be somewhere with good deal flow, obviously.

I was referring to Capital Markets Origination for ECM/DCM. At Citi, I guess the recruiting process for CMO vs. IBD is separated so you're right to correct me there.

Again, Evercore is prob a better bet now, but deal flow is not always steady at boutiques. Think of Gleacher or Miller Buckfire and how they lost talent and deal flow after initial successes.

 
bulldogs12:
First of all, congrats! Two great offers that would make a ton of people jealous. In terms of exit opps to PE/HF, boutiques can be a struggle sometimes. As mentioned before, these places are often focused on internal promotes. Exit opps to tier 2 buyside are common, but placement into tier 1 megafunds are rarer. However, EVR M&A is one of the better places to be for that purpose. EVR has done very well recently.

Evercore M&A analysts get placed decently well, occasionally at some megafunds too, but honestly, I think BBs are gonna heat up vs. boutiques as we get farther from the 2008 crisis. The days of places like Evercore, Moelis, Perella, Centerview killing it might be over, but I could be wrong. Especially since these places often tend to be one-man or two-man shows. Moelis analysts don't get placed as well anymore, while two years ago they were hot-shots, and Evercore's analyst program is getting bigger from what I hear, diluting deal experience opportunities. Again, this is just what I've heard, ask around.

Now if this were GS/JPM/MS, I would recommend BB, but Citi is on the fence vs. pure-play M&A at Evercore. Live M&A is fun vs. ECM/DCM, or worse, pitching. I'd probably lean towards Evercore unless you get the top groups at Citi. Stay away from Citi's product groups except M&A if you can. Two guys I know from Citi industry coverage got placed into megafunds, but also had top-notch undergrad.

Only parts of this are correct.

Duke4Lyfe's post above is much more on target with what is actually going on now.

 
bulldogs12:
First of all, congrats! Two great offers that would make a ton of people jealous. In terms of exit opps to PE/HF, boutiques can be a struggle sometimes. As mentioned before, these places are often focused on internal promotes. Exit opps to tier 2 buyside are common, but placement into tier 1 megafunds are rarer. However, EVR M&A is one of the better places to be for that purpose. EVR has done very well recently.

Evercore M&A analysts get placed decently well, occasionally at some megafunds too, but honestly, I think BBs are gonna heat up vs. boutiques as we get farther from the 2008 crisis. The days of places like Evercore, Moelis, Perella, Centerview killing it might be over, but I could be wrong. Especially since these places often tend to be one-man or two-man shows. Moelis analysts don't get placed as well anymore, while two years ago they were hot-shots, and Evercore's analyst program is getting bigger from what I hear, diluting deal experience opportunities. Again, this is just what I've heard, ask around.

Now if this were GS/JPM/MS, I would recommend BB, but Citi is on the fence vs. pure-play M&A at Evercore. Live M&A is fun vs. ECM/DCM, or worse, pitching. I'd probably lean towards Evercore unless you get the top groups at Citi. Stay away from Citi's product groups except M&A if you can. Two guys I know from Citi industry coverage got placed into megafunds, but also had top-notch undergrad.

The days of boutiques killing it will be over? Have you found out some magic ways for the BBs to return to two digits ROE? Or have you figured out how to offer financing while having no conflicts? If so please call Blankfein and Dimon. They need your help.

 
Charles-perry:
Please tell me this is is a non-London location? I was told by Evercore that they are not hiring in London....
Unfortunately, that is not true. Maybe they meant that they are not hiring anymore.
 

I'd say Evercore.

Evercore has been growing -- both their M&A and restructuring groups are killing it. Not sure about placement aside from one friend who's going to Madison Dearborn, but presumably they place well as they have a very solid program.

Citi is a decent brand-name but the job security there is troublesome. Also, unless you're in a product group, you're experience probably won't be as technical as might not position you as well since Citi is considered less prestigious.

In either case, congrats on both offers. Either firm would look solid on your resume.

 

Pariatur quas deleniti ipsa id. Quam itaque delectus iure laborum. Sint magnam pariatur dolorem mollitia delectus odit tempora. Quis aperiam sit dolores nemo provident. Quaerat est quia dicta laborum rerum possimus. Voluptatibus odio quia laudantium laboriosam pariatur.

Illum quos iusto libero et et. Facere sed amet omnis corporis delectus aliquam. Et quaerat ut itaque necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”