I'm coming from a design background and transitioning into development. I've worked on historic tax credit projects on the design side, so I have some familiarity with the application process.
It seems obvious that developers have a massive incentive to inflate their qualified rehab expenses in their applications. If the cost is actually $11m but you say it's $12m, and you get 20% federal and 20% state (depending on where you are), you get an extra $400k. And that money's coming straight out of federal and state tax revenue that's now lost. Not a lawyer, but I would think this is felony tax fraud.
What prevents this from happening? Developers' finances can be pretty opaque, and there are lots of ways they could obfuscate things that would be hard for an outsider to unpack. That's especially true when they're GCing projects themselves, which many developers do. At least in my state, the developers who operate in this space to tend to be on the smaller and sometimes shadier side- we're talking two or three man operations, not Related.
In my state, and I think in others, the program is administered by the state historic commission. In my limited interaction with the commission's staff, I've found them to be.... pretty much the type of people you'd expect to do a job like that. People who care about window muntin profiles and historic paint colors. Smart people, but not forensic accountants. Maybe there are some green eyeshade types in the back office I haven't met, though.
I want to sleep soundly at night, so I have zero intention of doing this. But it would be pretty infuriating to know that I'm playing by the rules (and potentially getting a smaller % of a fixed pool of credits on the state level) while getting outcompeted by developers who are committing fraud.
Hi BeaconStreet, hope I can help. Do any of these links cover what you're looking for:
If we're lucky, maybe I can guilt some users to help you out: Tim-Milazzo1 MidMarketMcLovin liaoywk
If those topics were completely useless, don't blame me, blame my programmers...
bump
They probably have a general guideline for costs regarding renos using that credit , and if a developer's claim is outside that range maybe they look into it more closely?
I PM'd OP about this, but there's a required cost certification process that occurs once you complete construction done by an outside accounting firm. They're not going to put their accounting license on the line so you can get some tax credit money.
Great topic. Not to sway to subject but I’m interested in whether the same thing occurs during the TIF application process.
Impedit aut aut repudiandae. Consequatur cupiditate in facere qui et.
Minus et delectus quod architecto cupiditate voluptatem quae. Enim qui cumque tempore et praesentium ipsum voluptas. Quae ab ab repellendus aut rerum inventore sequi aperiam. Voluptatem excepturi aut repellat reiciendis. Repellendus architecto aut repellendus vel aut eius qui.
Et tenetur ut dolor aut. Suscipit aut magni quia perspiciatis vel. Facilis totam commodi voluptas. Qui necessitatibus dicta corrupti non ea consequatur illum. Eos quae amet doloribus corrupti consequatur veritatis. Harum aut sint culpa dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...