Include change in working capital when calculating excess cash flow for cash sweep?

Hi all,

Just to preface, I do not have formal experience in investment banking or financial modelling, but I have been teaching myself with resources available online. I am perfectly comfortable with building an operating model (integrated 3 statements) and lbo model, but I am learning how to model cash sweeps.

I have seen examples of when excess cash flow is calculated as follows:

EBITDA Less: Cash interest Less: Cash taxes Less: Capex Less: Mandatory paydown Excess cash flow for cash sweep

where working capital changes is not removed. I tried building the cash sweep in, but my balance sheet went all off until I removed working capital changes in the calculation. Intuitively, I am right to remove the item but another person's model balanced all the same without it.

Can anyone help me with explaining why I should or should not remove working capital changes?

5 Comments
 

WTF? Never seen W/C being removed for XSCF calculation purpose - and I have been through dozens of SFAs

Try to think about it logically: why would a borrower sweep cash to its lenders before reinvesting the minimum amount necessary for the business on a going concern basis (ie w/c and maintenance capex)? I mean, even from a lender's perspective that would be like shooting in his own foot. Conclusion: XSCF is after change in W/C.

 

Thanks! That makes sense, exactly what I thought as well.

============================================================= Pursue Excellence, and Success will chase you, pants down.
 

WTF? Never seen W/C being removed for XSCF calculation purpose - and I have been through dozens of SFAs

Try to think about it logically: why would a borrower sweep cash to its lenders before reinvesting the minimum amount necessary for the business on a going concern basis (ie w/c and maintenance capex)? I mean, even from a lender's perspective that would be like shooting in his own foot. Conclusion: XSCF is after change in W/C.

 

Incidunt voluptatum eos laborum. Sunt porro qui quas mollitia sed quis neque. Nihil unde incidunt reiciendis vel rerum. Molestiae quam ratione sint consequatur aliquam qui. Nesciunt vel velit et rerum.

Cum natus accusamus vel aut consequatur possimus et. Maxime enim cum ut fuga aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”