Interview Question on bonds

I am preparing for an interview in Debt Capital Market. I went on the forums and different websites collecting potential questions.

I found this question:
Say you have two high yield bonds with identical coupons and maturities, one from a supermarket and one from a high tech company. Which one do you buy and why?

Here is how I would tackle this question:

The high tech company will represent a higher risk in terms of paying the coupons and the principal. Regarding the cash flow it generates and the liquidation value of the company.
- More uncertainty regarding the cash flow during the “life” of the company versus the supermarket company (annual sales of the products in the stores).
- Liquidation value difficult to estimate: lots of intangible assets (patterns…) versus the supermarket (stores to sell in case of bankruptcy, products in stock to sell).

But, we can also say that in a “perfect market”, this higher risk must be reflected in a lower bond’s price (when buying it in the secondary market) compared to the supermarket’s bond price.

So, everything will depend on the risk appetite of the investor. If I am a risk-adverse investor, I would choose the supermarket company because there is a higher probability that the company will be able to pay the coupons and pay back the principal. But, if I am more a risk-taker, I may choose the high tech company.

What do you think of this answer.....
Thanks a lot.

25 Comments
 
Best Response

Hey, I know I'm super late to this thread by a few months but I want to add a point you guys might have missed. The biggest difference (and, personally, the first that should come to mind) is "What collateral is there?" In a generic case, non-tech companies have very few, if any, hard assets and most of their cash flow is I.P.-related. Contrast that to a grocery store chain where (lets assume they own all the operating assets) the store, distribution centers, food delivery trucks, equipment, etc. can be used as collateral. The presence of collateral substantially reduces credit risk in a stark contrast between both industries. A great place to start is to look at the balance sheet to see if they even have assets in place.

I know we are talking about a high-yield scenario but even in this case, you should still assess collateral and where you stand on the capital structure. You guys got the stable cash flow point so I didn't mention that.

 
"reed.maybee"

Hey,
I know I'm super late to this thread by a few months but I want to add a point you guys might have missed.
The biggest difference (and, personally, the first that should come to mind) is "What collateral is there?"
In a generic case, non-tech companies have very few, if any, hard assets and most of their cash flow is I.P.-related. Contrast that to a grocery store chain where (lets assume they own all the operating assets) the store, distribution centers, food delivery trucks, equipment, etc. can be used as collateral.
The presence of collateral substantially reduces credit risk in a stark contrast between both industries.
A great place to start is to look at the balance sheet to see if they even have assets in place.

I know we are talking about a high-yield scenario but even in this case, you should still assess collateral and where you stand on the capital structure.
You guys got the stable cash flow point so I didn't mention that.

 

Explain convexity as it relates to term structure of interest rates.

"He that hath a beard is more than a youth, and he that hath no beard is less than a man." ― William Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing
 
Silent Guardian

Explain convexity as it relates to term structure of interest rates.

No one in distressed thinks like that. Go back to investment grade.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Reg S vs. 144A and fungibility. Some grace period questions etc..

Just remember that it's a much less liquid market. Explorer how you would build positions for clients etc.

It wouldn't do you harm to look into CDS, there's a very interesting sit. in Europe at the moment with Codere, paying its interest after the grace period, causing and Event of Default which technically should trigger the CDS, but it shouldn't if you step out of contract land. So there's going to be a fight.

If you're US side, best to familiarise yourself with Capt 11. Also, market trends, holders etc.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Thanks Oreos, really appreciate the advice. Reading up on Codere as you suggested.

I should have stated in my original post this is a buy side role. So not building positions for clients, but in this case for the firm. But I'd guess your point still holds about the lack of liquidity and difficulty/time needed to build positions...

thx again for your comments

 

At voluptas autem aut. Suscipit nulla et eum. Aut recusandae distinctio exercitationem et adipisci.

Sed recusandae perspiciatis aspernatur dicta nemo qui ea consequatur. Quo voluptatum a dolor deserunt officia quo. Laudantium amet ipsa consequatur et. Adipisci eum sunt deleniti quasi id nisi.

Dolor hic dolorem provident. Voluptas ut qui repellat fugit nihil qui. Dolor laboriosam voluptatum distinctio aut quia aperiam. Voluptatibus voluptatum sed maxime commodi atque explicabo sint sit.

Hic beatae velit similique consequatur hic. Similique vero modi laudantium quo. Quidem reiciendis et repellendus labore facilis deserunt sit. Quia odio id ducimus eum.

--------------------------------------- When you assume, you make an ass out of you... and only you.
 

Nostrum illo quasi consequatur voluptatem veniam veritatis et. Commodi ratione voluptate incidunt non officia quo. Nihil nam eveniet atque. Aspernatur ut totam quia est et ab fugit. Eius suscipit sunt quod minima. Odit occaecati voluptatem illum explicabo a.

Sit velit corrupti quidem architecto doloribus. Dolore placeat sunt magni distinctio. Repellat corporis asperiores tenetur sint dolor iure nihil. Veritatis veritatis consequatur id qui. Numquam soluta quo accusantium aut repellat.

Molestiae molestiae velit saepe. Asperiores aspernatur molestias earum aut. Consequuntur autem sequi unde. Odit dignissimos atque soluta maxime. Est laborum suscipit incidunt odio. Fugiat omnis ullam architecto quibusdam aut officiis tempora.

Aut architecto voluptas numquam consequuntur. Vero iure dolorem ullam autem suscipit qui. Autem dolorem ut quas amet. In molestiae nobis in praesentium illum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”