Is it really THAT bad with Deutsche Bank & UBS?
According to WSO's current poll, 59% of those that voted said that they would LEAST want to work for one of those banks. Is it really that bad? Should I not even bother trying to intern with them at all next summer?
I understand there are general issues (mentioned in quotes below), but will things turn around eventually?
From @idaho" re UBS hate:
My understanding is that they're downsizing their IB division like crazy and shifting to other financial services (e.g. their wealth management group). Also, I guess on here, everyone cares about prestige, and UBS is usually the bottom of the bulge bracket.
From @mrsteez" re DB:
DB is and has been in trouble for some time now (failed stress test, shitty employee satisfaction polls + layoffs, lawsuits...) - they're all over the news for all the wrong reasons.
Anything else I should know? Thanks guys
See the poll: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/polls/which-bb-ban…
I don't think you should avoid those banks, but I would imagine that they have lower return offer rates/are laying people off more frequently than the other bulge brackets and elite boutiques. If that's the case, I would say definitely apply, but if you have a better offer, take it. In addition, if you are at one of those banks and they have some massive series of layoffs (that is known through the finance world) and you get laid off, I'd think that places you'd interview at would be fairly understanding.
Just my two cents
Truthfully as much as it hurts me to say it, it's nearly just as competitive to get into those banks as it is for the top BBs. The competition will still be killer just because any BB name still has a strong brand name and opens many more doors than a top MM shop (non eb)
Regarding UBS: I have the same perception, many people were made redundant in the IB divisions. Very likely that this trend will continue...
Re DB: it is true that they have layoffs, however mostly in markets where they are withdrawing operations + downsizing in Germany (commercial banking). For IBD, this years analyst class is one of the biggest ever. This applies only to Europe: still "good" in the league tables, some teams had major hits (e.g. chemicals), but other teams are still competing with the american counterparts. Regarding the stress test: the american subsidiary had a Core Capital ratio of 30%, this is not why they failed. they failed due to qualitative reasons, because the it at db is so shit that they couldnt produce the asked information.
i may be a bit biased but i dont feel that db is going down the shitter!
It's not as bad as people make it out to be, but definitely something to think about if you are into banking as a longer-term path. Don't think UBS in NY / Europe is that bad. DB is in an extremely rough patch so hard to say what the longer term outlook will be.
DB gets paid below street, in my opinion. Below the other Bulges.
Beyond that, I think the IBD class in the U.S. hasn't seen much downsizing as what was expected and the layoffs have been overblown in the U.S.
OH NO MY FRAGILE EGO AND ITS PREFTIGE!!
(I am not at either of these banks, so its safe to say they both totally suck ass.)
Sure, and I bet competition to get into Bear was just as fierce going into '08
Couldn't agree with your more!!! Everyone wanted to work for Bear!
Nobody wanted to work at Bear on the IBD side.
And Drexel Burnham in '89.
That Drexel diaspora though... wish I'd had the opportunity to work back in the day at Drexel. The Predators' Ball by Connie Bruck - strong recommendation
I mean they are towards the bottom of the M&A league tables. What you expect
Had a Director at one of those banks tell me they couldn't help because they were trying hard to get out. Sounds like a sinking ship to me.
Both these banks are still BBs-- not considering them at all would be a little extreme. They're both in different places right now.
UBS has already finished the majority of its cuts and at this point is comfortable with the size of its investment bank (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-12/ubs-s-orcel-signals-h…). While it definitely is a smaller BB, the focus of management is on return on equity and not league tables. Can also add that morale is pretty high at the bank right now, and that offer rate for the summer was in line with past years (60-75%).
DB is having some issues in the press and is about to start reducing its presence, which is why there is some risk in going there. Keep in mind that it is a major financial institution that is not going anywhere, but expect a few years of lower comp/layoffs. Can't speak too much to the internal situation but that's my two cents.
Also its important to keep in mind that UBS/DB (along with CS/MS/GS) are all focused on cutting S&T jobs not advisory. Overall the BBs are hiring less not more, so ignoring 2 of the 9 is probably not in your best interests.
This is really where WSO fails. If you knew nothing about IB and just read WSO, you'd be under the impression that unless you get into HWS and then work at GS/MS/JPM you're f#cked. This is not the case. DB and UBS are still BBs and place well into buy-side shops.
You mean there's people on here that didn't go to HWS?
I didn't know the common folk knew how to create an account
Haha. Ya, they let me sneak by. Please don't tell Patrick :)
I don't disagree with your last point, but this is a matter of framing. The survey didn't ask: "Which of these BB's would you categorically deny an offer from?" It asked respondents to submit their lowest ranked preference. I doubt the majority of folks on here saying "DB/UBS aren't attractive" would actually spurn an offer from either bank in the absence of other BB offers. This is a discussion of relative value.
You're definitely correct. I guess I was more-so trying to point out that the whole sentiment that exists on WSO (outside of the poll) that UBS and DB are somehow terrible places to start as an analyst is false. I figured this thread was the best to mention that in.
For DB: Temporary pain, still a BB I'd love an opportunity to work for For UBS: Place has been a piece of shit since their top deal makers left in the mid 00's, and the financial crisis. Great place to do PWM, and maybe ER (as an extension of it's PWM strength). Banking there (from personal experience) is a joke.
What personal experience do you have? The IBD runs very lean now, and analysts get a lot of deal experience. Summer analyst return offer rates in 2015 were ~85%, and this year ~70%, which is a lot better than some of the other BBs.
I wouldn't say it's temporary.
If you're talking about the US, pretty much the opposite of what you said is true.
To the OP, it's the way the original poll question was phrased. By asking "which one the following:"....you have to pick SOMETHING. If someone said which mega-fund would you least want to work for, which ivy is the worst for getting a job on Wall Street, or which Victoria Secret model you'd least want to sleep with; the answers given wouldn't necessarily mean that those choices weren't high quality. It just means out of an ELITE group, they place towards the bottom. They are overall still really good in the big scheme of things.
As a current Associate at UBS (been here for 2 years), I'd be hard pressed to characterize the IB as a sinking ship.
The real "downsizing" people generally reference already occurred in 2011-2012 time frame whereas many of the European BB counterparts (i.e. Barclays, DB, Credit Suisse, etc) are now forced to make those restructuring efforts (or so goes the argument).
In all honestly, there are a couple reasons folks are getting laid off these days (as I see it): 1) the specialization/product/sub industry niche for some senior bankers makes less sense over the next handful of years 2) there isn't a forseeable role for the upcoming MD to service clients that isn't already covered by an existing banker 3) the market in general isn't supplying that many revenue opportunities so in response the bank will allow attrition or let some folks go who are lower relative (key word) performers
If you're a student looking to join a good bank with strong exit opportunities the decision process is no different than choosing which school you want to go to. In my view, as a junior banker the only difference you're getting is a brand. Some people will suggest that there isn't as much deal flow at certain banks and follow up with a bank that is in the top 10 of every league table as an example, but that doesn't make any sense.
The reality is, if you're a strong performer, people will want you on their deals and deal flow won't be an issue. Further, if you're trying to move on to the Carlyles, Apollos, KKRs, etc of the world there are senior bankers at all of these IBs who have relationships with these funds.
The point is, in my opinion, UBS is still a strong offer to land. There is strong deal flow for top performers, there are a lot of groups with great culture and the IB management has put a lot of focus on finding new ways to create a work life balance for junior bankers (which is huge).
Hope this helps.
P.s. - In my view the best responses have come from Sil and giantsfan349. Also, maybe I don't follow the "return offer" statistic well, but most of kids who summer and don't return find that banking isn't for them, not that the particular bank they summered for isn't good.
[Sorry for the typos]
Because they're not prestigious. The BB prestige rankings go:
DB and UBS are the Cornell and Brown of the Ivy League.
CS can't be above baml or Citi, come on.
CS is closer to JPM in terms of public perception. But I know people get wound up over the rankings stuff.
Did you go into a coma in 2011 and just wake up?
LMAO this is some Greekrank shit. Settle down CS.
Not a fan of anyone trying to rank "prestige", it screams TikTok finance "guru". But even so this list is pretty bad
what about SunTrust Robinson Humphrey guys..guys...
I worked at UBS a few years ago and one issue was always the 'hodge podge' of groups that were put together from various other banks where the firm hired out of and how the culture didn't always fit together. I'd assume that might have changed now and probably has given all the departures but something to consider. UBS is a shell of its former self given that Stamford and 299 Park are both shut down now - back in the day the traders in Stamford had a huge say in what direction the firm went.
That was some trading floor UBS had in Stamford- I heard it's all back office in there now.
From being on the UBS WM side, I can tell you that is where most of the jobs and focus is. The 2011 trader incident seems like it hurt IB pretty bad, and thats where the axe fell hardest with the layoffs in the years that followed. Seems to me like things have settled down since then. I would apply. If it's your only option I wouldn't hesitate to accept an internship with either. You can still expect heavy competition even for the UBS and DB internships.
Now, obviously Rachel is pretty hot. Monica is quite the looker, too, especially if you're more into brunettes. And Phoebe is, well... Phoebe.
If Phoebe shows up naked at my house at 2 in the morning after I've had a couple of drinks, I'm probably not gonna say no.
Sed vel consequatur nam aut. Est non in deleniti. Ut et excepturi ad facilis iusto iste eos. Eius sunt harum assumenda nam et.
Nisi repudiandae officiis ab et maxime distinctio. Magni cumque modi explicabo voluptate nesciunt quia. Magni quia blanditiis ducimus ducimus. Vitae veritatis occaecati possimus fugiat tempore distinctio.
Asperiores sit velit quibusdam eaque similique vero corrupti. Mollitia nam voluptatum culpa velit totam assumenda laborum. Dolores odit quo occaecati reiciendis dolores quis qui. Qui et qui error alias aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Iusto libero incidunt repellendus voluptatem ducimus minima. Inventore autem libero vel voluptatem repudiandae sapiente.