Is it true that the golden days of trading at investment banks are over
I recently watched a video and this guy named Anton Kreil, a former trader at Goldman, said that traders used to be able to millions easily at banks. But he then proceeds to discuss how traders do not do this anymore at banks and that most of their time is spent executing trades for clients. Is this true and if so why would anyone want to trade for a bank?
This is an asinine question and it's frequency of popping up on this forum, I liken to vaccines causing autism and other tin-foil theories. I was going to let this slide but by your two identical postings on this forum, a response is clearly warranted. You might as well be asking why a high-school athlete would consider playing tennis when the NFL pays so much more.
Look, people go into trading because they enjoy trading and importantly are good at it. I feel there are many prospective guys who want the title of a trader but don't want to put in the work that goes with it. Is it harder to make money? Yes, of course it is, but understand this is a hyper-competitive field and if anyone is looking for easy money, look elsewhere. Top traders gravitate to hedge funds because they have the talent and have survive the landscape, not just because of the higher pay-outs.
When did you realize that you wanted to go into trading? I'm still a senior in high school and I'm really interested in finance but I'm not sure if I should commit to this career.
You are in highschool and have plenty of growing in respect to what you want to do with your life--by all means you don't have to commit to ANYTHING right now, nor would you need to in a few years. I feel that like any interest, there was a natural gravitation towards it--I was always interested in energy and worked on the refining side, but found myself more interested in the prices rather than the engineering. I'd say my mid-twenties I shifted towards the trading side, enjoyed it thoroughly, and took it from there.
Prospectful still is not a word
Are the best days of Wall Street behind us? (Originally Posted: 02/08/2014)
Mod Note (Andy): Add it to your calendars: Kevin Roose will be doing a live Q&A on WSO on Wednesday Feb 19th from 3-5pm ET
Hi WSO: I'm the author of "Young Money," a new book about junior Wall Street bankers. I'm a writer with New York magazine (formerly with The New York Times), and I've been an avid WSO reader for years.
When writing the book, I heard a lot of people in finance wondering: Is Wall Street over? Are the best days of working in finance behind us? Or are things going to go back to 2006-style normal as the financial crisis gets smaller in the rear-view mirror?
What do you think? The comment with the most silver bananas will win a signed copy of "Young Money." Rules: Comments must be submitted by Friday February 11:59pm ET and the winners will be announced next Monday.
Click inside the post for more info about the book, and Click Here to purchase a copy. YOUNG MONEY Inside the Hidden World of Wall Street's Post-Crash Recruits Becoming a young Wall Street banker is like pledging the world's most lucrative and soul-crushing fraternity. Every year, thousands of eager college graduates are hired by the world's financial giants, where they're taught the secrets of making obscene amounts of money-- as well as how to dress, talk, date, drink, and schmooze like real financiers.
Anonymoose isn't a word either, correct?
For me, the answer to the question "Is Wall Street over?" depends on what you mean by "Wall Street." If what you mean is the "Liar's Poker" style antics of the 1980s, or boiler rooms like Stratton Oakmont, then yeah, I think that financial industry is gone and not coming back. Basel III and Dodd-Frank have made it nearly impossible for the big banks to be as profitable as they once were, and the culture of finance is changing. (As one young banker told me: "The bosses who do lines of coke off a stripper's ass don't exist anymore.")
But if "Wall Street" is defined like it was before the 1980s – as a place where bankers underwrote offerings, managed HNW accounts, and did other basic transactions – then the industry could have a bright future. In my opinion, Wall Street isn't gone – it's just losing its edge.
That sounds like an ATM.
History moves in cycles. Another way of looking at it is that it is becoming more conservative=stodgy=boring.
With regard to M&A, financial sponsors won't have access to as much capital under new regulation, so deals will be smaller, and BB IBDs will become obsolete. PWM and commercial banking will take over the large banks (already happening), and you will only see "boutique" banks doing all the deals.
Sorry but this is pure stupid nonsense.
Tough thing to hear when you work for a BB, I know.
delete
I am sure if we count up the times when Wall St. was 'gone' we would be well into double digits.
Hmm, I think that all this talk of "Wall Street" being over is just scare tactics. I truly believe that there will always be a "Wall Street" environment because what we see in the finance industry is such a fluid, dynamic business. I mean there will always be people seeking the high salaries that are typical of the jobs in higher finance work, but to me, I think the challenge of doing a good job in such an intellectual workspace will always attract people for the right or the wrong reasons.
I think that, for that reason, Mr. Roose's book will be really popular. For all the vampire squids out there, the hot topic is what actually goes into the job of analysts and associates. I think that people have this idea in their heads about what the work entails, but really there is no clue in the mainstream. I know that the people in the WSO community have more of a grip on the work involved, but I know for me, books like this one or Greg Smith's, or Turney Duff's were real eye openers, even Monkey Business was a good read. Finally, I just want to say that there will probably never been an end to "Wall Street: because outside of all the money, drugs, and other tales, no other work can capture a person's intellect quite like the dynamic universe of the stock market.
The best days of Wall Street are certainly in the rear view mirror for me.
Which one of you fucktards threw monkey shit at @"Kevin Roose"?
Just pre-ordered the book, bro. Can't wait. I think I might be one of the first people you told about it way back in November of 2012. Been waiting a long time.
Agreed. OT a bit but I am getting sick and tired of reading a well-written, succinct, and accurate post with an interesting conclusion, only to see a big red -1 at the bottom. I'd bet quite a bit of money that most of the time it's due to some young kid who just just joined yesterday and now feels qualified to run Citadel because he threw Monkey shit at someone who actually knows what the hell they're talking about. I think 90% of the SBs I've ever had have gone towards rectifying that situation. If you're one of those people, stop. Read until you can't read anymore, then read some more. You just might learn something.
Seems like a very interesting book...will definitely have to pick this up in the near future.
Are you fucking serious?? The best days of wall street behind us?? The market was just down fucking 326 points today!! What a fucking short!! As the markets get bigger there will be more volatility and more money making. Times are only getting better!
AdrenalineJunkie
I agree. people will create some other funky instruments to trade and find more loopholes in the regulations. Look at Goldman Sachs and bonuses.
The easy money is getting squeezed out from regulations. I don't think the hate toward the Street is going to continue too much longer, but the damage is already done. I really think the all-encompassing global BB is done for and a retarded idea for firms that keep trying to achieve the status.
People will figure out the businesses they're most profitable in, strip the rest, and try to not to blow up.
this sounds like a decent read. whoever is throwing MS seems to have no compass since eddie got hit with some and i likely will or even commenting on this thread. either way, definitely looking forward to the book. thanks for posting.
All the shit being slung is truly unwarranted. I had to spot Dick a SB just to get him back up to par!
I don't think so. I think it's just getting started (post-crash, obviously).
The way I see it, so long as we have demand for allocating capital, we will have a strong financial industry. It may look different because it has to adapt (just like it's been adapting all this time). But over? I'm going to go as far as saying "not a chance".
the criminal banks will always be in business
My guess is that in the near to mid-term, the "fun" aspects of Wall St will continue to decline. Equity comp that vests over a bunch of years just isn't quite the same. I'm guessing that a lot of the nonsense that I experienced just 10 years ago will no longer fly. The long-term is more uncertain.
What I do see is that a lot of the most talented people I know have already left "Wall Street" jobs or are actively considering doing so. I also see a lot more of the type-A MBAs that used to covet banking/PE attempting to start companies - is this a fad or something of a more permanent shift?
Maybe he is throwing MS around because he really really wants the signed copy of the book?
I don't believe it's dead at all. Just like every other industry, it is constantly changing. If the players don't adapt, they get left behind. As aspects of the business get cheaper (ex. brokerage commissions) or are turned over to cheaper labor or machines (back office jobs shipped to India, algorithmic trading), there are those who use those changes to their advantage, or innovate and find new ways to make money.
I've been told by older contacts in the industry that it may not be as FUN as it used to be, but there's still plenty of money to be made.
Just pre-ordered this book, heard about it from this thread. Pretty pumped to read it.
Wall Street will always be around, the street has been boom and bust for centuries. Periods of speculations like the original railroad stock issues are followed by periods of retrenchment. M&A advisory will continue to be profitable, same with ECM and DCM. My suscpision is that the Street goes back to being a profitable albeit less flamboyant place, alternatives will be increasingly like AM in general, there will be increasing price sensitivity and competition on price particularly at less impressive funds. Brokerage and wealth management will move from commissions more towards global fee arrangements or towards hourly fees. With less easy money sloshing around people will likely be less flamboyant
disagree.
I think this is a perfect time to be in finance. After every bubble everyone says wall street is dead, college graduates are less likely to apply for jobs making it easier to get in and you can't forget the whole purpose of wall street is to make money. After the tech crash everyone thought the game was over.
Second, the money is going to be made not at BB but hedge funds, PE/VC firms, and boutiques. Banks are selling off their credit portfolios due to the new regulations and hedge funds are buying them. Also alternative assets are going to be the future as long as yields are low.
I think the best days of working on Wall Street are over for now. Regulation has created new roadblocks for institutions to make money. However, without being able to predict the future, I think we will eventually see deregulation again as we did in the past. In the 1930's we regulation in the form of Glass-Steagall only to see the industry deregulated again by the implementation of Gramm-Leach-Bliley in the 90's. The point is I think as the financial crisis gets farther and farther into the rear view mirror, we will eventually see deregulation once again. I think this could return us to pre-2006 days because I view regulation as the biggest roadblock. Just my two cents....
There will still be money, but it won't be nearly as lucrative (excluding for the best of the best) or glamorous. BB's can't prop trade anymore, hedge fund returns overall suck, and trading is largely being replaced by machines. While the industry is shrinking, the competition for spots will continue to get worse. You're competing with flocks of graduates from overseas (mainly China) who will trade their souls and work for nothing in exchange for that prestigious finance job to bring honor to their family.
When breaking into the industry is just as competitive as ever (analogous to how competitive it is to break into a top school nowadays - you didn't use to have to start a non-profit organization in a third world country to get into an Ivy), the hours and other aspects of the job are still shit (eg. being confined to NYC, boring, unfulfilling work), and the money isn't there, the value proposition begins to diminish. The culture has already transformed from the fratty "sniffing coke off a strippers' ass" days to that of a bunch of nerdy Asian/Indian Ivy league graduates who've sacrificed their childhoods and social/sex lives to get those coveted spots. Finance isn't cool anymore.
I think BB banking has taken a hit and will never recover. Talent is leaving en masse and new regulations are going to prevent BBs from underwriting significant portions of new financings. Those financings are going to go to alternative capital sources that are not regulated -- think debt funds, CLOs, etc. Gone are the days of BBs taking a fee in high leverage (above 6.0x) situations.
I do think there is still money to be made, but in alternative areas of finance -- boutiques, funds, etc.
Kevin Roose is a godly financial journalist people. Young Money will soon take its rightful place among the financial literary canon. Go kevin!
http://www.kevinroose.com/
@hankyfootball thanks for the link, I'd briefly seen seen some of Kevin's other pieces (e.g. Last Temptation of Ted) but never connected the dots. Overall I bet those were some pretty cool assignments.
I'm a political junkie, so I try to be up-to-date on the regulatory environment of different industries. I think it's very hard to tell if the best days of Wall Street are behind us. On one hand, you would assume the nation would put oversight and safeguards on financial services to make sure they don't get crazy again (I know that is a hard pill to swallow). But on another hand, we all know the rich and powerful wield a strong influence on Washington, so policy may never hurt financial services toooo badly.
I've heard the same nonsense in 2003 during the last crunch - this is one is longer, but that one had far more layoffs, and older people in the industry heard the same nonsense in 1990 and before that in 1974. Its a cyclical industry and profitability will always come back. And the markets that are profitable are richer than ever - you can't hire a good D1 in Houston for less than 2 million dollars. I left investment banking for the buyside a year ago for the opportunity to build a business and create lasting equity value, but I don't think investment banking is dead at all. And I miss the banking culture, its harder to recreate in a small organization.
rain MS on this guy
random joes reading his book and asking me about IB thinking they know it all
New guidance out of the OCC, interest rates will most likely begin to rise next year and if the recent move by the ECB isn't a sign we've hit peak credit I do not know what is. Add in being overdue for the next recession, increased competition in finance and more regulation.
I'd say the glory days are over in most of finance. Though I know some credit guys that are chomping at the bit. Gonna be a nasty industry in the not too distant future.
The traders that were making bank pre-2008 at the BB firms were prop traders. With Dodd-Frank and Volcker rules prop trading doesn't exist at banks anymore. So any trader at an I-Bank now is either helping make markets or placing orders for buy-side clients. There is barely any discretion involved besides trying to fill them at a good price.
False. There's still a decent amount of positioning your book. This requires proprietary views. Most of the desks I've interacted with take some sort of proprietary risk. It is true that there are very few desks whose primary mandate now is to take this kind of risk and make money, but a lot of flow desks do have views and express them while trading the flow that comes in. However, I imagine pre-08 they could put a lot more capital to use to express these views than they can now.
If bank traders were just dummies making prices and executing client trades, i imagine it would be very hard to make money in the long run and would not be a very good business model.
I guess my answer was more equity specific. Things are definitely a lot different now post-2008. Both banks I have been at make their bulk of trading revenue by collecting a commission per share (3 to 6 cents roughly) for executing orders for buy-side clients. Good to know though that there are desks out there that still take prop views (I thought that went away with Volcker and Dodd-Frank), apologize for my answer that wasn't fully correct.
Atque placeat non cum et illum dolorem. Voluptates ea aut quaerat aut aliquid. Rerum dolores consectetur quia aliquam quia magnam quae. Ipsam animi expedita iure quam voluptas neque. Vitae voluptas corporis in deleniti facilis itaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Unde quisquam quisquam culpa aut nihil explicabo. Ad perspiciatis ut voluptates voluptatem mollitia. Sed ea molestiae aut labore. Et dolores in laboriosam aut quasi eaque omnis.
Ratione quasi officia cupiditate at maiores eaque assumenda. Pariatur voluptatem placeat labore dolor voluptas non aut adipisci. Facilis tempora similique aut et hic. Voluptatem qui qui libero laudantium exercitationem. Eveniet sed rerum voluptas vero consectetur velit. Quia at veniam voluptatem cumque voluptates voluptatem molestiae enim. Inventore pariatur reprehenderit dolor occaecati.
Similique nihil sunt voluptas occaecati excepturi dignissimos dolorum assumenda. Hic doloribus at blanditiis odit. Aut et maiores dolores blanditiis qui aut. Accusamus maxime voluptatum adipisci voluptas veritatis voluptatem laboriosam.
Libero ipsam in est totam alias aspernatur blanditiis. Sint modi nobis ratione sed. Dolores a nam vel illo quo praesentium quidem.
Asperiores numquam totam ducimus ducimus quaerat. Corrupti ab ut tempora voluptatem nulla aut. Optio similique voluptatem cumque sunt reprehenderit est. Voluptatem reiciendis voluptas optio quos culpa sed quibusdam.