Ivy League Certifications? A second shot or a scam

Finance is getting more and more competitive making it hard to break into any field, especially when you don't have a target school on your resume.

Now, Ivy League schools like Columbia, Harvard, NYU, etc are offering certifications in finance, and while this may seem like a second chance at getting that prestigious name on your resume, it may have the opposite effect.

Multiple recruiters have said that this appears "desperate" and that having internship experience is 10000% more valuable.

What's your opinion? Is a 700$ certification from a target school a SCAM

 

I know a guy that did one from Harvard and now his Linkedin has Harvard Business School on it and he tells people he went to Harvard. Such BS. He's not the only one I have seen play that game with those certifications. Not sure how much weight they carry but those people lose credibility with me once I see it is a certificate. Wharton has a set of classes on Coursera that earns you a certificate. Doesn't mean you went to Wharton but as you mentioned it is competitive and people will spin anything to stand out in the crowd.

 

hahahahahaha says the person that didn't get any type of education from an Ivy League! Why don't you write these schools and complain that you, a guy sitting in his parent's basement who doesn't like the idea of providing all forms of education? See how that goes for you.

 
Most Helpful

I really think it depends on why you are taking it on how you are "selling" it afterwards.

When I was being asked if I wanted to start moving into a corporate development role at my prior company some years ago and before going to B-School, I had very little formal finance education. I was working with financial statements, doing modelling and such every day but given my educational background I had never taken a formal accounting or a finance class.

So my company as a part of my transition sent me to Wharton for one of their 1 week ish classes. It is not a certificate or a degree but it is in person at Wharton with some great professors (I think price is closer to 13K than 700usd though)

The class did give me some great tools and a way to structure my own learning going forward, it also opened up a broader spectrum to me, realizing that M&A was way more than just financial modelling but that it is truly a cross functional complicated exercise.

  • Did it help me in my job in Corporate Development? yes it did, not as a stand alone, but if you prepare well and continue learning after then it was great.

  • Did it help me break into IB after business school? I doubt it, but given how many of my interviewers went to Wharton it at least meant that we could talk about the bars around campus and it felt like we had something in common. Also it was easy to show that my interest in finance started before I went to B-School, so it did help my story.

  • Would I ever claim to have a degree from Wharton? certainly not! I did list it on my resume, as i think it tells my story, but I am very clear to state that this was a non-degree program!

It is a great program and if you are in my position or if you are in a industry role and all of a sudden gets asked to be a part of M&A for your company then it makes a lot of sense! Adding it to your resume straight out of undergrad on the other hand will in my opinion not really add any value. If you wanted finance classes in Undergrad then why did you not take finance classes?

I see all of these non-degree or certificate programs this way: If you feel like the content will help you, then it is great! but I would not do any of them as a resume booster and especially not right out of undergrad.

 

Brand yourself with truly meaningful experiences (internships, volunteer work, genuine scholastic accolades). These are 100% a scam and will make you seem either desperate or (worse) insecure. Anyone who has taken the classes will know that they don't give you a valuable learning experience. Thus, it reflects poor judgement to drop the expense you need to pay for enrollment. I had a VP who was obsessed with these - he's the type of guy who will tell you he went to an ivy league when asked where he went to school, but only for his MBA.

Be proud of where you went to school. If you ask someone who went to Princeton UG and Harvard MBA where they went to school, they won't tell you Harvard. Don't be the guy from the state school who still feels as though they have to compensate for this.

"Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
 

I am getting really mixed feedback on this, but it seems like the majority of people advise against it. It is one thing to do a workshop, but its another to pay for a cert.

Also, I agree with your assessment on state schools. I go to a state school and wish I would've given a damn in highschool (but I didn't) so it was my only option. I think I can definitely prove myself with my GPA and jobs though.

Getting caught lying is far worse than saying you went to a nontarget.

 

I embrace the hell out of my non target (arguably semi, but I think this is a stupid, qualification seeking distinction anyways). On that note, I would personally rather be seen as the gritty, intellectually curious work-horse than the entitled WASP. Obviously a lot of personalities in between, but I wouldn't trade anything for my background.

"Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
 

One of my biggest inspirations is my friend who finished school right when the crash happened. He moved to India and worked in IB for like 4 years and then came back as a trader and ended up doing amazingly well. We all just have to find our way to make it work. Gladly the new generation is more accepting of non matching the exact criteria than the older one

 
isa2130953:
Finance is getting more and more competitive making it hard to break into any field, especially when you don't have a target school on your resume.

Now, Ivy League schools like Columbia, Harvard, NYU, etc are offering certifications in finance, and while this may seem like a second chance at getting that prestigious name on your resume, it may have the opposite effect.

Multiple recruiters have said that this appears "desperate" and that having internship experience is 10000% more valuable.

What's your opinion? Is a 700$ certification from a target school a SCAM

I am 100% on board with an MBA or research-oriented graduate degree. Where you actually quit working and attend for a couple years and make a bunch of friends along the way and hopefully learn some stuff.

I am not on board with paying for these branded certificates. You should have your own brand, not some school's.

My brand is that I'm thrifty, I'm fifth generation Dutch Calvinist. I drive a Rusty Honda and I enjoy Hang Gliding. And if you can't figure out how I made it all the way from a state school computer science degree to being a statarb quant researcher at a hedge fund pulling a Sharpe of 2 with some serious capacity, that's your problem, not mine.

 
isa2130953:
Thanks I agree! It seems like everyone feels that way, so I am glad I asked before I made the investment. It seems like it actually has the opposite effect on recruiters, and not one wants to seem desperate.

1.) If you need a credential, I'd give some thought to the CFA exam.
2.) Your first job, or your next job, is probably not your last job. Patience tends to pay off in the long run.

 

If I'm reviewing a resume and some one tries to sneak something like that into the full blown education section - to me that's a major major ding. It's so obviously just bs and the goal is to be misleading. Pretty much an auto ding for me.

That said, if you find the classes useful and will help in learning/story go for it. I'd react way more positively if it was under an "other" type section. Like just a random bullet point: Complete X certificate in finance from Harvard's extension program to develop finance skills or whatever. Then in a cover letter / interview you can talk about how you wanted to learn more so did an this course. But the fact that its from an Ivy is irrelevant, its more so you did the work to gain experience.

 

It depends who your target audience is. Anyone in high finance won't care and may even ding you. On the other hand, these programs may help you with commercial (business) loans or with obtaining government contracts, or they may help you show academic ability for a master's program admissions when you didn't perform particularly well as an undergrad. So, audience always matter.

Array
 

A Harvard Extension School degree or credential does have a certain value or positive effect anywhere OUTSIDE a 100 mile radius of Boston/NYC where many know the huge difference between HC and HES or the office of someone who actually went to undergrad at HC. You'll never hear the end of it if you're caught trying to bait and switch.

 

When I'm helping people with their resumes, I typically put stuff like this (and certifications from non-university institutions, like Udacity for coding) in the skills section. To me, the programs are at best a signal that you have a real interest in an area, nothing more.

Life's is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
 

Not sure scam is the word I'd use, but yes I'd say it's mostly a bad idea. IMHO it's helpful to understand how we got to this point.

The role elite schools play in the economy has gotten more ridiculous over time, and now it's jumped the shark like every once-great TV show does in its final seasons.

The schools used to be about educating people, and that worked as long as the customers (students) viewed it the same way. But over time, the customers started viewing top schools as branding factories; you go there to get a piece of paper and that's basically all of the value. That cynical view of the business model didn't immediately ruin education, because the schools didn't jump on board with the customers right away. The last ~2 generations of students may have thought they were just buying a degree, but the schools stayed focused on their mission and actually tried to teach some things.

But now the schools are on board with the new money-for-credentials model, and you're seeing this play out with examples like these weak certifications and a proliferation of online masters programs and so forth.

When I was in college, I saw DeVry advertise on the subway. Then some years later, it was University of Phoenix. Now it's Columbia. This is to say nothing of the various non-college degree programs . . how many certifications are out there now? It used to just be CFA, now there seems like 15 different sets of letters you can buy.

I'm not sure how long this silly trend will last and how it will all end, but I am confident the money and time is not well spent for the customers.

 
Funniest

I heard now you can write "#BlackLivesMatter" hundreds of times on your application essay and get into Stanford. I doubt this would work for me due to how much "white privilege" I have; maybe if I wrote it 1,000 times it would carry similar weight...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/04/06/his-appli…

 

This reminded me of an amazing book I read a few years back. I recall feeling jaded by this system of nepotism. However, once you've made it outside the well-trodden path, you realize the people around you from institutions such as Harvard and Stanford were the small fish in their respective universities. The true elite were reforming the way you consume and finding cures for diseases while the supposed elites came up with the genius idea of using leverage to buy companies and roadshowing bond offerings.... Anyways, book below:

Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life https://www.amazon.com/Excellent-Sheep-Miseducation-American-Meaningful…

  • ^ irony
"Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
 

How do people feel about Ivy visiting programs (studying domestically as opposed to abroad)?

Just from my observation - people LOVE (strong emphasis) to see study abroad on a resume when we all know well and clear that it's just a semester of consequence-free partying in some warm and touristy western European city, most frequently done right before turning 21 during the spring semester for us in colder states. A buddy of mine took a wine tasting class that actually fulfilled some undergrad requirement back at our school. He also said the classes were total jokes, he'd skipped several weeks in total that semester to go to festivals and other touristy cities, didn't learn anything, and got a 4.0 that all transferred back.

Wouldn't a visiting semester at an Ivy demonstrate more merit?

 
eyebee-throwaway:
How do people feel about Ivy visiting programs (studying domestically as opposed to abroad)?

Just from my observation - people LOVE (strong emphasis) to see study abroad on a resume when we all know well and clear that it's just a semester of consequence-free partying in some warm and touristy western European city, most frequently done during the spring semester for us in colder states. A buddy of mine took a wine tasting class that actually fulfilled some undergrad requirement back at our school. He also said the classes were total jokes, he'd skipped several weeks in total that semester to go to festivals and other touristy cities, didn't learn anything, and got a 4.0 that all transferred back.

Wouldn't a visiting semester at an Ivy demonstrate more merit?

Isn't the most common grade awarded at Harvard an "A"?

Array
 

Maybe... grade inflation is real though, I agree. I think their trick is making an A count as 4.3 or something to offset the A- and Bs.

Although, still a more difficult and "real" learning experience than everyone's panty dropper - "studying" abroad, no?

 

I agree with the recruiter that internships (I'm talking freshman and sophomore summers) are essential. I went to a target and virtually all of the people who secured junior summer analysts positions at top firms like Goldman Sachs and Evercore had sophomore investment banking experience.

You could major in international relations, english, art history - it doesn't matter. If you go to a non-target or semi-target, however, it's almost required that you're a finance major. But at a target, whether you think it's justified or not, your major or any certificate program isn't that relevant. They just care that you have the internship experience.

 

This Fall I will be taking a Harvard Extension School course and plan to take a couple more after.

Granted its not a certificate course like the HBX ones it's an actual, full, for credit course that is applicable to my non-target finance degree. I have yet to add them to my LinkedIn but when I do it will state exactly what I took and where from. For example, Harvard Extension School: Courses: Principles of Finance, Macroeconomic Theory...etc GPA: x.xx, Project details..... This for me is most important because I get to learn from some of the best lecturers like Rand Ghayad.

No way is it a good idea to sell yourself as a target school graduate, but it should not diminish the education quality you get.

**Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable.**
 
35noidea:
This Fall I will be taking a Harvard Extension School course and plan to take a couple more after.

Granted its not a certificate course like the HBX ones it's an actual, full, for credit course that is applicable to my non-target finance degree. I have yet to add them to my LinkedIn but when I do it will state exactly what I took and where from. For example, Harvard Extension School: Courses: Principles of Finance, Macroeconomic Theory...etc GPA: x.xx, Project details..... This for me is most important because I get to learn from some of the best lecturers like Rand Ghayad.

No way is it a good idea to sell yourself as a target school graduate, but it should not diminish the education quality you get.

I would strongly recommend against adding that to your Linkedin. If you're doing it for the learning experience then more power to you, but keep it off your resume or Linkedin. You will look ridiculous if you add it on.

Array
 

Aut sint dolorem et dicta. Cum animi hic itaque voluptatum sint praesentium deleniti. Quia id omnis quibusdam dignissimos et. Illum laborum tempore quae ab.

Fugiat laborum beatae impedit accusamus architecto ipsum. Et ut ab libero aperiam. Impedit eum odio et qui aperiam. Quia aut eveniet aut quos unde molestias. Accusantium dicta dolorum autem ut aut enim porro. Voluptatem qui eum rerum ullam cupiditate expedita animi ea.

Voluptatem optio eaque pariatur et. Et nulla voluptatem commodi commodi. Quos consequatur nobis ea quae eligendi inventore laboriosam quas.

 

Quos ratione rerum omnis et. Consectetur et saepe est laudantium magnam.

Sint magnam maxime et quasi. Impedit ut est sed enim. Dolores itaque facere temporibus sunt ut. In eos quae dolorem officiis similique beatae. Eaque voluptatem similique consequatur pariatur.

Eum ducimus eligendi aut hic qui repudiandae. Repellat qui sed et quidem ut quia mollitia. Ut aut autem minima hic a exercitationem.

In adipisci dolore distinctio consequatur esse. Et cupiditate omnis commodi architecto incidunt voluptatibus voluptatibus perferendis.

 

Voluptates earum assumenda omnis dolor aliquam modi iure. Quos beatae culpa quibusdam dolores quasi iure aut. Alias et qui laboriosam et odit inventore qui.

Modi est ex tenetur nam sed impedit repellat eaque. Molestiae et reprehenderit dolor vel. Temporibus ut id ipsa. Sequi est totam aut provident repudiandae. Eum voluptates ad impedit.

Cupiditate eaque iste maiores ut. Aspernatur quia iste occaecati molestiae reprehenderit.

Deserunt neque eligendi pariatur harum cupiditate molestiae unde. Aut ut occaecati quia non in cupiditate blanditiis. Velit omnis sint delectus cum rerum adipisci aut. Ipsa mollitia voluptatibus fugit id dicta dolor. Est temporibus quisquam ab sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”