gibranmeng:
ginNtonic:
Kohlberg, Questor, Summit, Arcapita, American Securities, Olympus, TA and General Atlantic (latter two do non-mid cap deals as well)

Who told you Summit is the place to be? It's a glorified call center for associates.

Didn't pay attention to "best" midcap sponsors to work at, just rambled a few off the top of my head that were not on the list. Summit & TA = Call Centers.

 

I'd argue LGP, Hellman & Friedman are a bit better than the others mentioned on this board. Both of those were / are the top choice fund for many people at top groups. Them along with MDP I would say are between middle market and mega funds. I'd feel guilty putting those three in the same breath as Summitt etc.

Golden Gate guys are geniuses- their last fund shot the lights out - very interesting strategy.

 
scotttwibell:
Capital? They focus primarily on aerospace/government and their new fund is focusing on above and half on industrials/consumer. Do you guys have any info on their prestige?

pretty well known to those covering industrials.

 

HW places very well into MM PE. Typically, you will be working on deals a notch below Jefferies, RBC, etc. and two notches below BBs and EBs. HW typical deal size is probably $100-$500 million, though it has worked on deals lower and higher than the range.

HW's model has long been one of blast every fucking financial sponsor in the world every deal we have. While that sounds a bit ridiculous and annoying (at least from my perspective), it clearly works because HW gets a TON of sponsor exits/sales. Working with PE on both sides will give you plenty of opportunities to interact with various firms and because of its strong deal volume, you will be in good shape for MM PE recruiting. Just don't expect to land at a megafund and it will be more difficult to crack upper MM PE. You can still earn a nice living.

 
Best Response

This is great advice. For AA, based on your group, timing (especially if you end up doing PE recruiting after only working for a year and change), and just plain luck of the draw, your deals at HW could be larger or smaller than other MM firms, but your experience will be focused on sponsor-to-sponsor transactions. You will have very limited exposure to public companies and division of larger companies, so that will make megafund recruiting more difficult. However, you'll be at least as competitive for MM PE as you would any of the other MM IB firms.

My advice might be different if you were a senior, but I'd lean towards taking the HW offer. HW is well respected so you'll probably have a chance to "move up" in full-time recruiting if that's what you want to do. Therefore, it may not be worth the risk of striking out on your other interviews. However, you may have a better sense of your competitiveness for the other interviews. Depending on your resume, school and network, you may be a sure thing for 1 of those 12 or you may strike out on all 12 (better men than me have).

In summary, if MM PE is your goal, HW will certainly give you that opportunity. If you have bigger aspirations, it may make sense to roll the dice, but a summer internship at HW shouldn't close any doors.

 

Take it. Harris Williams is probably the best investment bank (including BBs) for landing in middle-market PE. As stated above, it is highly unlikely that you'll get into a megafund. However, I'd argue that Harris Williams analysts place better into the sub $1bn PE market than the BBs. For a confirmed summer gig vs. rolling the dice in interviews, you really can't go wrong. The downside of striking out far outweighs the upside of going to a larger bank for the summer.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 
CompBanker:

Take it. Harris Williams is probably the best investment bank (including BBs) for landing in middle-market PE. As stated above, it is highly unlikely that you'll get into a megafund. However, I'd argue that Harris Williams analysts place better into the sub $1bn PE market than the BBs. For a confirmed summer gig vs. rolling the dice in interviews, you really can't go wrong. The downside of striking out far outweighs the upside of going to a larger bank for the summer.

CB is spot on per usual.

 

I would absolutely turn it down. Because you aren't going to be at the firm's headquarters or any of their large offices, you won't be in a big summer class, which means you are going to get swamped with more work than summers in the bigger programs. You also won't get any training and there might not be any other interns for you to be measured against. You're performance will often just be compared to the full time analysts, which puts more pressure on you to perform from day 1.

There will be no HR to regulate anything and it's quite possible you will get worked to death. And since you are doing sell side M&A working primarily with sponsors, it's going to be boring as shit for you. You won't learn to model. You'll be working in powerpoint all day doing CIMS, management presentations, and meaningless research on sponsors' relentless diligence requests. Also tons of bullshit administrative work.

You won't have the same resources as a bigger firm and could very well be spending 20% of your time binding pitchbooks. There will be no powerpoint plug ins or any of that fancy shit. Also you will have no time/ability to network over the summer because you'll be in a city that is completely peripheral to finance. So basically you're fucked if you don't get the offer - and unless you're from this regional city, your group will probably be skeptical you even want to be there be FT. Also, all the full time recruiting at all reputable shops is very accelerated. You will need to be networking early if you even want a shot. It's practically done by mid september.

If you are confident in your interviewing skills, try to get something at a bigger firm in a bigger city through on campus recruiting.

 

Voluptatem blanditiis ipsam facere sit qui molestias quia nostrum. Corporis qui doloremque perferendis facilis similique voluptatibus. Et sit dolore quo sed non. Odio eaque qui quia rerum aut non.

Omnis omnis quo quia omnis ab. Totam aut odit nobis quidem. Minus vitae labore ipsum molestiae nemo rerum delectus. Occaecati laboriosam tenetur voluptas quis vel molestiae nisi. Ut molestiae dolorem totam eaque et autem.

Est ex aut debitis odit. Voluptas voluptates rerum sed qui rem ut dolorem. Nihil impedit corporis porro non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”