Many people haven't even heard of Rothschild.

If you ever want to leave banking, it will be easier with the much more recognizable name (also easier for business school).

Also, since you are asking about M&A, MS is by far the best (even better than GS). Rothschild is nowhere near second (the only area where they are very strong is restructuring).

You might possibly be justified in going with a top boutique over MS (Laz, Ghl, Evercore, BX), but rothschild would be crazy unless you get into their restructuring group and are positive you want a career in restructuring.

 
Best Response

Here are my thoughts.

1) Morgan Stanley has tremendous brand recognition and you WILL get a good experience. Even if you don't get a good experience, you're a crappy analyst, get shitty work, etc. headhunters will be jocking you non-stop. The worst analyst in my group went to Providence, which is a great shop. There are no asterisks associated with working at MS. Back when I was an analyst people would say I work at UBS (1) or I work at Credit Suisse (2) or Lehman. You work at MS you just fucking say you work at MS and people know what the fuck is up, no asterisks needed.

As for exit opps Morgan Stanley on your resume is going to push you light years ahead of Rothschild in PE/HF recruiting. All the major buyout firms hold special cocktail hours/dinners for GS/MS candidates (and some others), which gives you a HUGE leg up on recruiting. Alot of these firms ask for the white shoe candidates from the headhunters and backfill the spots with other banks later on in the process.

Note: (1) in the Los Angeles office, which has Ken Moelis and all the DLJ guys.
(2) in FSG in NYC, I worked on that Apollo deal. (3) in Retail, after they stole the team from Credit Suisse.

2) Someone pointed out that Rothschild is a stronger brand in the UK, I disagree. I think Rothschild's presence in the UK is 100x stronger than it is in the US. MS is a global brand with prestige associated with it wherever you are.

-- Interview Guides GMAT Tutors WSO Resume Review --- Current: Senior Analyst - Hedge Fund Past: Associate - Tech Buyout Analyst - Morgan St
 

Rotschild is definitely a nice firm, but Morgan Stanley M&A is the best on the street. Just look at the 2009 YTD league tables guys (source: Thomson one banker)

Worldwide completed YTD 1. MS 2. GS 3. Citi 11. Rotschild

Of course, this table differs every year, but a gap of #1 vs. #11 is difficult to ignore. Good luck with your choice.

 

Sent you a PM.

This comparison is yet another ridiculous show of prestige-obsession. Newsflash: Rothschild's banking business isn't built around league tables, it's built around 200+ years of stability.

MS is a fantastic firm, but this isn't a "no brainer" and the kid isn't stupid for asking.

 

Does this really merit further explanation? No, MS won't collapse soon, although have we already forgotten that it almost did just over a year ago? This is something Rothschild et al have never had to worry about (along with press coverage, political pressure, populism, and oh yeah, its share price).

I certainly would not have wanted to be in the shoes of an MS -- or any other BB -- analyst 14 months ago.

Rothschild and other private firms have built businesses based purely on [centuries of] providing the best advice. MS and Goldman used to be similar -- in fact they made their names as private firms -- and then they threw in securities and started to take on risk.

In the end what matters is where you'll do best, and that's something that a league table won't tell you. Apparently a forum here doesn't provide much help either.

 

Dolores expedita accusamus ducimus non dignissimos quos. Repudiandae quaerat exercitationem beatae sed rerum iure.

Qui dolorum aperiam repellendus sed perspiciatis harum aut. Minima enim est non ad omnis aperiam. Cum labore assumenda enim molestiae. Facilis nobis fugit nisi sed autem necessitatibus aut. Error voluptatem quod id sapiente doloribus modi quibusdam. Tempora et veritatis recusandae accusamus nobis nihil.

"What we can, we must; and because we can, we must"

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”