Please excuse my ignorance

Why did Jamie Dimon have to testify? I understand its about the 2 billion dollar loss but I still don't know why. I'm sure if an individual such as Warren Buffett lost 2 billion, he wouldn't have to testify. Sorry for my ignorance and dumb question.

7 Comments
 

I'm completely stupid as well. Let me shed some ignorant light on this for you. 2008 just happened. Frank-Dodd is being enacted (no prop trading, this trade is considerably "proppish"), they pose systemic risk and are monitored by government security and trade organizations.

That is my shitty 1.5 cents.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

In short, it was a fucking dog and pony show. Legally, if Dimon didn't want to show up, he didn't have to. But, when the clowns in congress request an appearance, and there is looming draconian regulation hanging in the balance, it would be insane not to show up. Dimon going to congress is nothing more than a PR show for JPM and a pathetic opportunity for the useful idiots in congress to feign their outrage.

 

Volcker rule - they thought the risk of the trades was less legitimate hedging and more prop trading.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 

He showed up voluntarily, and the naive, retarded senators kept asserting "taking risks with the banks money. this is not hedging, this is gambling/betting, etc." Typical stuff.

The difference between successful people and others is largely a habit - a controlled habit of doing every task better, faster and more efficiently.
 

Omnis modi fugiat velit quaerat. Qui rerum commodi quas labore eius nemo ratione.

Autem aut ut aliquam necessitatibus. Autem sit animi quae illum.

Reiciendis rem dolor architecto nemo aut laudantium corrupti. Modi blanditiis saepe sint.

Quis praesentium voluptatum nemo omnis iure non. Dignissimos cupiditate delectus quidem saepe rerum perferendis dolore est. Eius est qui quas possimus. Odio est maxime quae dolores qui. Suscipit fugit architecto est id.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”