53 Comments
 

I work at another private credit shop but interact with Antares and Golub a frequent amount - their reputation is definitely Sponsor friendly, which is partially why they lead so many deals (that + their hold size). Antares is more middle market vs. Golub but regardless, from a co-lender’s perspective they often steamroll over our input in order to maintain their Sponsor relationships. Wouldn’t shock me if associates were miserable due to culture / workload though.

 

I started last year and I'm very happy with the move so far. I came from levfin banking so I mostly knew what to expect, but the flexibility you can offer as a lender makes the work much more interesting. I like the transaction volume and faster paced environments but that may be a personality thing. I work with a few ex-PE analysts who would tell you the diligence process for new investments is pretty similar. Can't speak to that personally but there's obviously large chunks of the VDR you can completely ignore, for example. If you gravitate towards M&A and the credit markets then you'd probably like the role 

 

That's awesome to hear and congrats on finding an exciting role. I'm actually in levfin as well now, but have generally been more interested in PE, though I would love to learn more about a career in private credit. What would you describe as the key workstreams of the junior/mid level team member in a private credit team? In PE, from what I understand, the workstreams can be roughly segmented into sourcing / evaluating / deal-making / management / exit / fundraising.

I'm imagining life in private credit is similar, but would you mind explaining maybe how management / exit might be different? I feel like a lot of the fun in PE is actually getting to partner with portfolio companies and playing a part in the strategic direction of the company leading up to an exit(obviously peripheral as a sponsor, but a part nonetheless). How involved is your team with the companies that you invest in? What parts of the job do you think are more / less interesting than a job in PE?

Not a lot of stuff written about the work itself, so just curious.

 
Most Helpful

All good questions. I'll try to hit on the main points -

In a typical example, we'll enter the equation during an auction process and work with 1-2+ sponsors on leverage or market reads while they formulate their bids. It could also be an IB contact that reaches out to us for something like an opportunistic refi or non-competitive M&A process. If we're interested in moving forward, we'll screen the transaction internally to our investment committee and then provide a term sheet or grid of indicative terms.

Many places bifurcate underwriting and originations while others might have hybrid roles. I primarily focus on evaluating / executing / portfolio management. I spend a lot of my time reviewing CIMs, financial statements, QoEs, and industry research, at management meetings and on diligence calls. All that info needs to be distilled into the salient points that tell the story of how the business operates today and will likely fare going forward. The work is not unlike what you're probably used to - modeling, financial analysis, and writing credit memos. The jr person typically builds the model and develops a lot of the analysis used to inform the risk rationales and investment thesis. Ultimately you're doing much of the same operational due diligence as the sponsor while trying to converge at a similar place of comfort with the investment. On the PM side there are valuations, portfolio reviews, and no shortage of ad hoc projects that pop up. Things like fundraising and interacting with our LPs are usually reserved for sr management and the BD team.

Keep in mind you can only really do so well in a debt deal once it closes whereas equity investors actually participate in growth. Since our upside is effectively capped, we focus on identifying and mitigating all the business risks up front that could impair our returns, i.e. lose us money. Put simply: equity looks to maximize upside and generate outsized returns; debt looks to minimize downside and structure around loss mitigation. Understanding legal docs - the various baskets and their implications - and opining on terms is increasingly more of the job even at the junior levels.

One thing I like about PC vs. PE is getting to see more transactions since we're not digging in quite as deep or actually operating these companies. We're minimally involved if at all with a portco's day-to-day (unless it's distressed and/or being restructured, which is a different story). In terms of exits, I've heard of people moving to other DLs, B school, credit-focused HFs, back to banking, and PE. I'd caution you that it seems a lot easier to go from PE -> PC vs. PC -> PE

Feel free to let me know if I missed something you wanted me to address

 

You've probably seen this but I'm going to redirect you here since there's a lot of good info: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/credit-funddirect-lending-salari…

"PFSynergies

Analyst: $80-95k + 10-45% bonus
Associate: $100-150k + 25-75% bonus
Sr. Associate/AVP: $150-200k + 50-100% bonus
VP: $175-235k + 80-130% bonus
Principal/SVP: $225-275k +100-150% bonus
MD/SMD: Who Knows"

 

I interviewed at Antares once and was surprised how little they paid at the associate level. People I spoke with seemed ok. Does anyone here have an opinion on when it’s “too late” to leave IB for PC/DL? Like do you see VPs make the switch ever? I know some of the groups in OPs post are comprised of a lot of former commercial banking or big four due diligence people. Would exiting later from MM IB even be possible?

 

Different skill set and if you’re a vp it’s hard because you’re taking a massive pay cut + bring no direct investing experience to the table. Of course it depends on what you’re doing in IB. If you’re working in the merchant bank or if you’re working in underwriting or maybe in structuring, think then it’s more possible but otherwise it’s just tough logistically but never impossible. 
 

on your point on Antares, they along with most other BDCs are public for the most part and as a result underpay. Private funds generally pay more because they keep all of the. Fees. Antares also has a lower fee structure from my understanding than some of the higher yielding stuff, but they make up for it with higher AUM. It’s confusing to me how they can continue to attract talent when all in comp is ~50% of competitors 

 

Antares junior here. Antares isn’t public, it’s privately owned by CPPIB. Pay is lower and everyone knows it, I think retention/attraction has been decent given good culture. I would say I work 40-60 hours a week and only a couple weekends per year. They are allegedly working on raising it, but all in senior associate comp was ~180k (not NYC or SF) is at least respectable I’d say. More importantly, they mainly hire from undergrad and from big 4/commercial/corporate banks where people are getting a raise to do more interesting work. There are almost zero ex IB

 

At expedita quo repellendus sapiente non quia ut. Est eligendi hic qui qui. Dignissimos assumenda possimus facere deleniti facere distinctio vitae.

Repudiandae ab reprehenderit fuga. Aspernatur autem officia odit aut in et. Tempora provident eveniet ut.

 

Et facilis aut culpa id voluptatem commodi quaerat. Tenetur est aliquid cumque quia aut fugiat aliquam voluptas. Sint porro consequatur necessitatibus aut velit accusamus asperiores.

Eaque veritatis earum voluptas tempore quis labore nam quidem. Aut ex dolores enim aliquid ipsa nihil. Non et tenetur quod illum sint.

Odit repellat nulla autem repellat voluptas est omnis. Non est impedit iste sunt eius sed. Dolorem ut vitae qui. Ab atque asperiores adipisci distinctio. Rerum id necessitatibus velit non cupiditate ea. Excepturi aspernatur non sed quae architecto.

Dolorem quia inventore omnis fugit aliquid ex corporis. Quia sit totam non. Cumque in ad quos facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”