Toughest Technical Interview Question? -- How do you structure an M&A/IPO deal?

A friend of mine who was interviewing for a investment banking summer analyst position with a top-tier bulge bracket investment bank (in Hong Kong) got completely shattered by this unexpected question, "How do you structure an M&A/IPO deal?" After days of discussions we still could not find a plausible answer to this question.

Would really appreciate if anyone on the forum can share any idea on this one.

19 Comments
 

lol. I think the general hiring landscape in Asia is heavily focusing on technical questions, at least in Hong Kong and China.

People act how they should :)
 

What were the answers you tried?

For M&A, wouldn't be how you pay for the deal? or how you plan on buying the asset (share acquisition vs asset acquisition)? Will you set up an off-shore SPV for it to be tax efficient e.g. funneling it through Cayman's/BVIs (e.g. AB inBev - SAB MIller used an SPV)

For IPOs, same answer with the SPVs (e.g. for DCM - i know its unrelated but logic applies - China Orient AM raises debt via some investment vehicle called China Bright Company (or something similar) in the BVIs)

Maybe its about the time line?

Array
 

Thanks dank.knight. These are two separate questions actually, one is for M&A and the other is about IPO. I really love your idea of share vs. asset acquisition and setting up a SPV. As a matter of fact, from suggestions gathered from a bunch of other senior investment bankers that I knew (who are also heavily engaged in the recruitment process), some plausible answers include a lot of yours, such as the SPV thing, share or asset acquisition, cash/stock mix, earn-outs and the timing of planned execution.

People act how they should :)
 

Maybe the interviewer was asking for the criteria that you would use to determine the ideal structure of a deal. An expected output of a merger model would be the EPS accretion / dilution sensitivity table analysis with respect to the share of the purchase price paid in cash vs in stock. Another set of criteria are those required by banks: EBIT/interest expense > 4, ND/EBITDA 3, Debt/Equity 1 and so on. Sensitivity tables on all those criteria would allow you to determine which options are acceptable to all stakeholders.

 

I guess I'll answer since the other chimps are dumb as a pack of apes. You don't do an M&A & IPO deal together. M&A is intended to merge two companies either strategically for synergy or financially for growth/exit ops.

An IPO is part of an exit op.

As far as structuring, M&A is usually structured with varying tiers of debt tranches, mezz, convertible bonds, and equity stakes.

IPO is structured several ways, one being firm commitment, dutch auction, and so forth.

 

You are right. The interviewer asked my friend on the M&A first and then IPO next immediately. Sorry for not pointing that out in the question. Anyway, thanks for the thought on the financing part of M&A, definitely agree with it. And yes, for the IPO part you can't forget to mention the underwriting methods (firm commitment, best effort, bought deal). Yet in terms of the structure of the listing, there are way a lot more to ramble on such as shell companies (back-door listing) and time line management.

People act how they should :)
 

I disagree.

Bain Cap concurrently ran an M&A + an IPO when they partially exited Worldpay in 2015. It's called a dual track.

Obviously, you have to choose one in the end though.

Array
 
Best Response

Assuming you aren't misquoting the original question, I would first ask the interviewer if you could ask a few questions for clarification.

The exchange could go something like this:

Interviewer: How do you structure an M&A/IPO deal?

You: That's a tough question, as they are very different transactions. Do you want me to cover my thoughts on both, or did you have a sample transaction you wanted to discuss?

Interviewer: I don't really care, I'm just seeing if you know the difference and what both types of transactions generally look like.

You: In that case, I think IPOs are mechanisms for owners of private companies to raise capital from the public equity markets and provide liquidity to existing shareholders. In the case of a merger, I think there are few true 'mergers', and that most transactions are really acquisitions. It's my understanding that mergers are defined as occurring between two companies of roughly similar size, where the preponderance of both firms remain even after operational synergies are realized a couple years after the transaction. I think acquisitions are very broad, and can occur between a number of different counter-parties who have different reasons for doing deals. A financial sponsor usually structures a deal differently than a corporation, for instance. They may need to sell a portfolio company due to legal restrictions on the fund's lifespan. Or maybe they want an early exit to juice their IRR because they get compensated off that metric, and they'd like to start squirreling away some money into their carry pool. For companies, maybe they're cash rich, and don't know what to do with their money. Maybe they have little cash, but think debt is cheap, and that now is the right time to buy something before the market turns. Maybe they're buying something opportunistically, or maybe the founder is being profligate with the firm's money. There are too many scenarios to consider to talk intelligently about deal structure, without understanding deal rationale.

Interviewer: I guess I meant to ask if you knew the difference between a share purchase agreement and an asset purchase agreement, but thanks for rambling incessantly without clarifying.

 

Est et nam id culpa. Quas vero natus iure alias ut. Veniam ducimus rerum necessitatibus eos tempora. Et quia ut voluptatem sint hic sit rerum. Blanditiis occaecati sequi omnis exercitationem.

Beatae quis iure voluptatem aut non. Ab sint dolores aut accusamus nemo.

Cum quis animi et doloribus excepturi. Magnam eveniet harum at dicta aut amet nihil. Accusantium temporibus et doloremque pariatur. Et ad quo corporis rerum tenetur.

Nisi rerum ut quod soluta ex incidunt aut unde. Ea molestias iusto ad. Id rem repellendus non dicta rerum. Suscipit autem reprehenderit omnis adipisci.

People act how they should :)

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”