Tricky Question: Working Capital
Company A has $1000 sales. Sales increases to $2000 (so by 100%)
AR: 1 day AP: 90 days
What is the gain in NWC?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +427 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 37 | 15h |
| +327 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 41 | 3d |
| +151 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 50 | 14s |
| +61 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 5d |
| +60 | Best IB Group Overall? | 35 | 3h |
| +54 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 9h |
| +39 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 4d |
| +37 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 29 | 7h |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 17 | 3d |
| +27 | [HELP REQUESTED]: Take A2A Promo or Go Corp Dev | 12 | 2h |
Career Resources
push
Push anyone?
Lol, is this a real interview question? I'd just say that the effect on NWC is $1000 up on day 0 and $1000 down on day 1, all else equal (which also seems ridiculous, but there's no other information).
Thank you! Yes it is, no other information. Could you elaborate? I am having trouble converting the revenue into the AP/ AP figure.
If I did this in real life I would do as the poster below and treat the AR as cash sales and say that the effect on NWC was 0. No deal-driven buyer would ever argue you on this unless they're stuck up pricks, in which case I would probably tell the analyst on the other side that we could fight over it with a broken pool stick.
This is a dumb question, 1 day DSO might as well be cash sales so shouldn’t really change NWC on an increase in sales. You’d need to ask for more information on inventory turns to know how NWC responds.
I wonder if the below works: 1) Sales=$1,000 --> A/R=1x365/1,000=2.7 2) Sales=$2,000 --> A/R=1x365/2,000=5.5
I don't have COGS to compute A/P and I don't have Inventory but assuming COGS grow proportionally and are 50% of sales: 1) A/P=90x500/365=123.3 2) A/P=90x1,000/365=246.6
This business looks like, say, a grocery store - customers pay you immediately, but you can pay suppliers on credit. Therefore, i would assume the Inventory will have also more days to stay in the shop before it gets sold. For the sake of example I will take 45 days. 1) Inv = 45x500/365=61.6 2) Inv = 451,000/365=123.3
Therefore, in case 1 (sales=$1.000) NWC=2.7+61.6-123.3=-59 Case 2 (sales=$2,000) NWC=5.5+123.3-246.6=-117.8 Therefore, we can conclude that NWC improves with sales growth, with proportional impact on liquidity ( 2x sales reflects in 2x NWC)
I am not a big expert in NWC, therefore appreciate if people who are more familiar with the concept can comment whether it makes sense?
Thanks!
You're calculating the average NWC here. I don't think there's a point in dividing by 365 and going through the entire exercise. Your calculation only holds water if COGS increase proportionally with sales, which is often not the case. The marginal cost of selling 1 more product x is often a convex curve where marginal costs are decreasing to the point where it is close to, or equal to, the purchase price for the grocery store.
Aut voluptas placeat hic quis qui. Explicabo non ut necessitatibus eos harum natus nihil. Ut assumenda voluptatum numquam aut est doloribus incidunt. Est unde atque eius repellat provident quo.
Voluptatem cumque quasi velit dicta eligendi vel officia. Qui est nisi odio consectetur recusandae. Id qui nihil numquam et sapiente et. Ipsum cumque sunt ut. Nam vitae enim id sed reprehenderit mollitia. Aut hic exercitationem vel ut. Aliquam veritatis maiores voluptate.
Numquam beatae aut amet aliquam. Consequuntur voluptas nulla odit tempore voluptatum sed et. Et earum rem sunt. In ipsam in voluptates. Consequuntur est eum perferendis voluptatem dolor. Velit deleniti molestiae quis totam necessitatibus quo excepturi quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...