WeWork’s Losses Swell to Nearly $2 Billion as It Seeks Global Expansion

We work's losses more than doubled last year to about $1.9 billion, even as its total revenue also doubled to about $1.8 billion.

Article->https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/business/dealb…

 

This. "Venchur Capitul" really has become real estate flipping for Patagonia wearing, kale smoothie drinking, 6 AM jogging meatheads. Actually, this is unsurprising given the low yield environment we're in. Institutionals have to park their megabucks somewhere. And oh hey VC is pretty hot right now, right? Asset allocation, baby.

 

Airbnb is the only one of these ipos I think look interesting.

Lyft/Uber lack any kind of moat in an autonomous vehicle world. There’s going to be 10 apps that fiercely compete on price.

WeWork - I would love to see a great write up on them and how they can have margins not seen in the real estate game. I guess for commercial real estate maybe they can minimize loss to lease and price more like apartments? But I don’t see the huge valuation creation.

Airbnb though I think might have something sustainable. In many ways it’s like Uber/lyft. Big difference is an Uber/lyft app competitor you spend 20 min in the car and is repeat business. For a week long house rental brand name I think can matter more and they have a chance to maintain margins.

Sometimes you have great new ideas that sound amazing. Then you look out 20 years and the idea was realized by the competitors never gained any margins. Think about airplane investing in the ‘50s. Would have looked very sexy. Then they basically lost money non-stop for 60 years. You need something in a business that limits competitions. Fb had it because you could only have a couple social networks that everyone would be on. No one is going to use 20 networks so was a market that would find a winner.

A lot of these IPOs to me just feels like industries that will have a ton of companies and no margins. Ride-sharing doesn’t feel like a winner take all market to me or WeWorks current shared-work space model. If there’s 20 players in a market no one gets huge profits.

Like I said I’m open minded Airbnb might be the exception,

 

Not true at all. I’ve stayed in $5k a night Airbnb (festivals like Coachella) and have rented out $1k a night Miami Beach condo. They are definitely in the high end.

I’d argue it’s actually more useful at the high end as rich people often have luxury properties that are often vacant and conversely a lot of people want to rent unique places instead of hotels.

 

Lol what a ridiculous comment.

Do hotel only cater to younger and poorer customers? That's a silly generalization because different hotel products cater to different customers. Just like AirBnB has shared bedrooms and entire multimillion dollar villas on a mountain or beach you can rent out.

Also, some random joe named Sam Walton became one of the richest people on earth but selling stuff to lower income folks.

 
Most Helpful

Ride-hailing feels kind of like a scammy roll up situation right now, yes?

Long term, I think it boils down to a duopoly, with Tesla owning the high-end Apple like experience and Google owning the low-end.

The most talented people I know at Uber all shifted to the Eats side of the business, so maybe they can put together a monopoly in an adjacent market...

That said, I think long term Amazon owns the stuff delivering space.

Lots of smart people (Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, etc.) think AirBnB is the exception.

When I'm staying some place longer than a week, I'll pick an AirBnB over a hotel (I've personally used AirBnB to book places for 2-3 months at a time when moving to a new city), and I know quite a few people that use the service to rent out spare bedrooms or residential property they're not using.

There is also lots of cool experiential shit you can find on AirBnB (i.e. renting a compound in the Costa Rican jungle with some friends for 2 weeks) that really isn't available elsewhere.

I still like the service high end hotels provide, and I don't see how AirBnB replaces that without changing their model.

Maybe AirBnB ends up as the ultimate middleman, sitting between residential owners and renters globally?

 

While I am rooting for Airbnb due to uniqueness of their listings (who doesn't want to rent a villa or treehouse), I am not nearly as bullish as you are around them for two main reasons: increasing competition from traditional players (Booking, Expedia and as of last week Google) and professionalization of the platform. Part of the uniqueness that very much developed Airbnb's brand is eroding while commercial players take over the platform. I'd much rather support the "mom & pop" outfit as if I wanted to support the commercial company I'd use my points at Hilton.

Robert Clayton Dean: What is happening? Brill: I blew up the building. Robert Clayton Dean: Why? Brill: Because you made a phone call.
 

Good. I hope they fail, and all the other coworking spaces as well. RE needs to see more people lose their shirt, and more often. It bothers me to no end that half the developers in NYC are fucking morons building high priced condos, not hitting their numbers, working out their debt with a bank, and not losing a penny because they syndicate out all their equity. And then waiting 12 months and doing it again, because lenders and investors don't seem to give a shit about track record any more.

Put some of these idiots on the street; let the failures fail for real, and we'll see pricing and the industry as a whole come back to earth. That goes for WeWork and every idiot who plowed money in, or every idiot who tried to crib the same idea under a re-branded name.

 

Agree 100%. Worth noting that luxury condo margins are incredible tho, so there is incentive to gamble on the projects. If the project doesn’t fail, everyone involved is flush with cash and newly emboldened to start more of them.

“Doesn't really mean shit plebby boi. LMK when you're pulling thiccboi cheques.“ — @m_1
 

And then there is “community-adjusted Ebitda,” which excludes those expenses — as well marketing, administrative and other costs of growing the business. By that measure, WeWork earned $467.1 million last year, double what it earned in 2017.

What the hell is this? On what planet does this even make sense, for anyone to report on and/or any self respecting person think is a viable measure. It's not even the fact that everyone can make up whatever measures they want, but that someone thought it was even worth thinking this way - that's what terrifies me. Even if the intention is not to be a viable measure - what the fuck is that!?

I understand adjusting things, eliminating accounting shit that hits you, etc. I get it. But this type of shit just makes me so angry on so many levels.

 

Class B and oversupplied office markets are already getting whacked this cycle even with the huge artificial demand coming from the coworkers - it will be interesting to see what happens if/when that dries up. Tenant's demand for top quality space has created a huge gap in rates between the "class A" buildings and older class-b in all of the markets I cover. WeWork (and their competitors) have been paying decent rates for (generally) class b/less desirable spaces (albeit with large concessions). If wework goes away, I think that these large concessions will continue, but the higher rates they are paying will not.

 

Est eum deserunt ut deleniti sequi molestiae excepturi. Quia nemo est laboriosam deleniti.

Saepe odit incidunt aspernatur soluta error. Voluptatem eligendi eaque est.

Maxime ut ab sit itaque. Odio assumenda aliquid officiis recusandae. Ut eos quaerat expedita accusantium. Fugit iste placeat amet eum expedita.

Iste incidunt alias nobis sint non impedit. Autem commodi qui nemo voluptatem. Qui ut nihil quasi. Possimus quasi id minima voluptatem id. Quis expedita aut ipsa voluptatibus corrupti aut. Rerum nihil velit quisquam quia et quasi velit. Consequatur ea dolores quo architecto omnis consectetur amet sunt.

 

Repellat illo nulla id voluptas iste est perspiciatis. Modi quia eum qui qui ratione consequatur. Tenetur vel sed hic fugiat.

Modi dolores consequatur iure architecto commodi quaerat. Voluptatem deserunt ut quo et officia. Sit ex quibusdam quae assumenda nihil omnis. Nobis ut facilis cumque maxime dolorum facilis.

Maiores et pariatur magni hic commodi rerum accusantium. Ut ut enim doloribus nesciunt enim. Omnis quia quo fuga iusto delectus suscipit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”